1 / 18

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & EVALUATION. APPRAISAL POPULARITY. Large Organizations: 95% Small Organizations: 84% All Private Organizations: 89% City Governments: 76% State Governments: 100%. TQM VIEW OF APPRAISAL. RESPONSE TO DEMING. KEYS TO BETTER APPRAISAL. Increase objectivity

branden
Download Presentation

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & EVALUATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL& EVALUATION

  2. APPRAISAL POPULARITY • Large Organizations: 95% • Small Organizations: 84% • All Private Organizations: 89% • City Governments: 76% • State Governments: 100%

  3. TQM VIEW OF APPRAISAL

  4. RESPONSE TO DEMING

  5. KEYS TO BETTER APPRAISAL • Increase objectivity • Improve appraisal interview session • Emphasize Performance Management

  6. Recommendation 1: Appraisals should be objective, rational, and accurate Reality: OBJECTIVITY

  7. Scale Orientations • Traits • Behaviors • Results

  8. SCALE FORMAT • Comparative (Comparison among workers) • Forced Distribution • Rank • Paired Comparison • Comparison among anchors • Forced Choice • Graphic Rating Scales (Compare to anchors) • BARS • BOS (summated scale) • MBO

  9. Common Rater Errors • Negative and positive skew (LENIENCY/severity) • Halo/Horn • Central Tendency (Dilbert) • Attribution error • Stereotyping (representativeness) • First Impression (anchoring) • Recency (Dilbert) • Contrast Effect • Similar/dissimilar to me Effect

  10. REDUCING RATER ERRORS • Memory aids • Frame of reference training (rater training) • Rater accountability • Increased frequency

  11. Recommendation: Appraisals should be objective, rational, and accurate Reality: Subjectivity and inaccuracy often dominates the appraisal process Subjective methods Manager’s unconscious bias/rater errors Deliberate manipulation Why? Impact? Overcoming this OBJECTIVITY

  12. KEYS TO BETTER APPRAISAL • Increase objectivity • Improve appraisal interview session • Emphasize Performance Management

  13. IMPROVING APPRAISAL:APPRAISAL SESSION • Put Employee at Ease • Participation • Appeal • Self-evaluation • Performance Focus • Sensitivity • Tone • Positive Feedback • Examples • Performance plans

  14. KEYS TO BETTER APPRAISAL • Increase objectivity • Improve appraisal interview session • Emphasize Performance Management

  15. PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Goal Setting Formal Feedback Session Coaching And feedback Rate and Evaluate

  16. PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & MBO • Clarify goals/expectations • jointly determined • cascading 2. Periodic review and feedback • based on input from multiple sources • 360 degree feedback 3. Coaching based on developmental sessions 4. Performance-based rewards

  17. IMPLEMENTING MBO • Formulate overall objectives • Allocate among departments • Specific objectives for department members • Implement action plans • Review progress and provide feedback • Provide performance-based rewards

  18. ADVANTAGES OF MBO

More Related