1 / 6

New Production Rate Estimates for In Situ Cosmogenic 14 C

New Production Rate Estimates for In Situ Cosmogenic 14 C. Bailey Dugan, Nathaniel Lifton, A.J. Timothy Jull University of Arizona. Cronus-Earth/EU Workshop, Vancouver, July 12-13 2008. Funded By The U.S. National Science Foundation. Promontory Point Results.

brandi
Download Presentation

New Production Rate Estimates for In Situ Cosmogenic 14 C

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Production Rate Estimates for In Situ Cosmogenic 14C Bailey Dugan, Nathaniel Lifton, A.J. Timothy Jull University of Arizona Cronus-Earth/EU Workshop, Vancouver, July 12-13 2008 Funded By The U.S. National Science Foundation

  2. Promontory Point Results • Site Production Rates Generally Consistent w/Earlier Estimates • Replicates • Unexplained Variability • Use Weighted Means • 05PPT-02 • Replicates Agree • >2 Below Site Weighted Mean • No Obvious Reason • Higher Position on 05PPT-01 Outcrop • Excluded from Further Analysis • Additional Analyses Planned 49.7 ± 1.3 w/05PPT-02 51.4 ± 0.8 w/o 05PPT-02 CRONUS-Earth

  3. Corrie Nan Arr Results • Good Agreement Between Supra- and Sub-Glacial Boulders • Supports Assumption of Landslide Deposition on Retreating Glacier • Additional Analyses Planned CRONUS-Earth

  4. Maol Chean-Dearg (Mull Kin Jerig)Results • Site Production Rates Show Generally Good Agreement • Replicates • Unexplained Variability • Use Weighted Means • Additional Analyses Planned CRONUS-Earth

  5. Sea Level, High Latitude (SLHL)Production • Four Scaling Models Compared • Lal (1991)/Stone(2000) • Dunai (2001) • Desilets & Zreda (2003)/Desilets et al. (2006) • Lifton et al. (2005) • Variable Atmosphere Assumed for All • Geomagnetic Assumptions • Geocentric Axial Dipole for Lal/Stone • Continuous Geomagnetic Model of Lifton et al. (2008) for Others CRONUS-Earth

  6. Scale to SLHL

More Related