1 / 9

In-situ Propellant Production and ERV Propulsion System

In-situ Propellant Production and ERV Propulsion System. Preliminary Design Review 2/6/01 Adam Butt. In-situ Propellant Production. Propellants selected to be produced Reasons for the selection Method of production to be used Risk Analysis. Methane Advantages

berg
Download Presentation

In-situ Propellant Production and ERV Propulsion System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. In-situ Propellant Production and ERV Propulsion System Preliminary Design Review 2/6/01 Adam Butt

  2. In-situ Propellant Production • Propellants selected to be produced • Reasons for the selection • Method of production to be used • Risk Analysis

  3. Methane Advantages CH4/LOX reaction capable of Isp~365s Relatively efficient and cost effective to make Disadvantages Must be cryogenically stored Requires 3.5 times as much O2 for optimal reaction Methanol Advantages Does not require cryogenic storage Higher density  smaller tanks Requires only 1.5 times as much O2 Disadvantages CH3OH/LOX reaction Isp~340 Selections and Criteria

  4. Methane Sabatier Reactor LOX Water Electrolysis Zirconia Cell process Methanol 2C0+3H2CH3OH+2H2O Methane derived methanol More in-depth study needed Method of Production

  5. ERV Propulsion System • Consists of two stages • Lower stage of Methanol/LOX • Utilizes methanol’s higher density and lower mixture ratio to achieve an overall smaller and lighter system than just methane/LOX (Zubrin) • Upper stage of Methane/LOX • Utilizing this reaction’s increased performance to provide final impulsive DV to the smaller upper stage

  6. Two stages – both Methane/LOX Total mass=190tonnes Vol of CH4=65m3 Vol of LOX=96m3 Two stages – 1st Methanol/LOX, 2nd Methane/LOX Total mass=185tonnes Vol of CH3OH=70m3 Vol of LOX=74m3 Staging Comparison Assumptions: DV=5.7km/s, mpayload=33tonnes, neglect drag/gravity loss

  7. Power Requirements • Based on the following equation, Pe = [0.145(MT)1.238] kW • And on the ~115kW power production of the nuclear reactor • It will take around 800 days to produce all the necessary propellant. Therefore as the HAB departs Earth 2 years after the ERV, around 90% of the propellant will have been produced.

  8. Basic Risk Assesment • The main back up will be the 2nd ERV/in-situ plant arriving around the same time as the astronauts • In-situ plant • Zirconia cell process involves the use of large brittle cells – Cannot withstand high g-loading, additional replacement cells need to be brought. • Sabatier reactor comprised of simple, rugged steel pipes • ERV Launch System – The more stages the more complexity, the greater the risk

  9. Future Work • Research Methanol production in greater depth • Size in-situ production plant • Further asses possible failure modes, and determine necessary redundancy plans

More Related