1 / 10

Pacifica vs. FCC

Pacifica vs. FCC. The dawn of Federal indecency enforcement. The Law. Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1464, prohibits the utterance of “any obscene, indecent or profane language by means of radio communication.” But until the 1970s it was unclear whether this was constitutional.

brandi
Download Presentation

Pacifica vs. FCC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pacifica vs. FCC The dawn of Federal indecency enforcement

  2. The Law • Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1464, prohibits the utterance of “any obscene, indecent or profane language by means of radio communication.” • But until the 1970s it was unclear whether this was constitutional Mae West was banned from radio in the 1930s (by the industry) after her routine with Charlie McCarthy

  3. Then came the sixties Rise of Free Form FM Radio at WBAI in New York City George Carlin

  4. The case • 1973: father complains to FCC that he and his child heard the Carlin program on WBAI while driving • FCC puts complaint in WBAI’s file, calls Carlin routine “indecent” • WBAI appeals case to appellate court and wins • FCC takes case to Supreme Court

  5. Pacifica vs. FCC (1978) • Five to four Supreme Court decision says that the material is “indecent” and FCC can regulate it • “Pervasiveness” of media and individuals’ “right to be left alone” outweighs the First Amendment

  6. Supremes: “To say that one may avoid further offense by turning off the radio when he hears indecent language is like saying that the remedy for an assault is to run away after the first blow.” “Second, broadcasting is uniquely accessible to children, even those too young to read.”

  7. William Brennan’s dissent: “[The majority reveals] a depressing inability to appreciate that in our land of cultural pluralism, there are many who think, act, and talk differently from the Members of this Court, and who do not share their fragile sensibilities. It is only an acute ethnocentric myopia that enables the Court to approve the censorship of communications solely because of the words they contain.”

  8. So now what??? • Pacifica prohibits FCC from editing in advance, so it can’t give guidelines what indecency means • In 1988 (The Jerker) FCC expands concept, agency would no longer sanction language or material "that depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory activities or organs.“ • Public Telecommunications Act (PTA) in 1992 establishes “safe harbor” period of 10 pm to 6 am

  9. 2004, Golden Globes decision • After Bono declares “this is really, really fucking brilliant” on TV, FCC warns that “fleeting expletives” (single bleeps) no longer protected by First Amendment • FCC sanctions Fox TV for Billboard Music Awards comments by Cher and Nicole Richie • 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals overrules decision • 2009: Supreme Court says decision doesn’t violate the Administrative Procedures Act, but may violate First Amendment • Supremes also overturned 3rd Circuit’s stay of the fines for the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunctions • All cases now back at Appellate courts being reviewed on First Amendment grounds

  10. Issues that will be raised at 2nd and 3rd circuit courts • First Amendment constitutionality of FCC decisions • Do they go beyond Pacifica? • Does Red Lion have anything to do with this?

More Related