1 / 15

Electricity Supply by Energy Sources in 2001 81.6 TWh

Electricity Supply by Energy Sources in 2001 81.6 TWh. Net imports 12 . 2 %. Hydro power 16 . 3 %. Wind power 0 . 1 %. Oil 1 . 9 %. Peat 6 . 9 %. Coal 14 . 1 %. Other renewable 11 . 4 %. Natural gas 10 . 3 %. Nuclear power 26 . 8 %. Electricity Consumption in Finland. TWh.

branxton
Download Presentation

Electricity Supply by Energy Sources in 2001 81.6 TWh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Electricity Supply by Energy Sources in 200181.6 TWh Net imports 12.2 % Hydro power 16.3 % Wind power 0.1 % Oil 1.9 % Peat 6.9 % Coal 14.1 % Other renewable 11.4 % Natural gas 10.3 % Nuclear power 26.8 %

  2. Electricity Consumption in Finland TWh

  3. Nominal power, MW 21000 Demand for new capacity 18000 CHP, industrial 7500 MW CHP, district heat 15000 Other condensing Coal-condensing Nuclear power 12000 Hydro & wind power 9000 6000 3000 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2030 2040 2045 2050 Electricity Production Capacity in Finland

  4. Electricity Demand and Production Capacity in the Nordic Countries TWh

  5. Increase of Electricity Demand and Production in Finland until 2015 TWh Gas Consumption Increase 5th nuclear unit Hydropower (max) Wind power (max) Saving (max) Electricity import reduction Biomass fuels (max) Old capacity reduction

  6. WHY ADDITIONAL NUCLEAR POWER? New nuclear power plant covers partly theadditional electricity demand and replacesold power plants enables, together with renewables, the fulfilment of the Kyoto commitments secures stable and predictable electricity price reduces the dependence on electricity import

  7. Statistics 1990 level Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Finland Business As Usual 100 All greenhouse gases 90 80 70 CO2 from fossil fuels and peat conservation + renewables + non-CO2 million tons CO2-equiv./a 60 50 Coal, natural gas and nuclear power 40 30 20 10 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

  8. Generating Cost of Base Load Alternatives (100 cent = 1 euro) cent / kWh At 8000 hours/year Real interest rate 5% April 2001 prices

  9. First stages of the application process 2000-2002 • Application 15.11.00 • Public hearings • Loviisa 12.02.01 • Eurajoki 14.02.01 • Statements • STUK 08.02.01 • The majority of statements 28.02.01 • Eurajoki and Loviisa 31.03.01 • Complaint filed on the Eurajoki statement 24.04.01 • Dismissal from Turku Administrative Court 13.09.01 • Dismissal from Supreme Administrative Court 21.12.01 • Council of State decision 17.01.02

  10. Discussion on the application for a decision in principle, Council of State and Parliament • StanceVoting resultDate • Council of State discussion positive 10-6-(1 absent) 17.1.02 • Parliament preliminary debate 13-14.2.02 • Committee statements • Social affairs and Health neutral unanimous 22.3.02 • Administration neutral unanimous 3.4.02 • Environment adverse 6-(1 abstention)- 10 24.4.02 • Agriculture and Forestry positive 0-(1 abstention)-6 24.4.02 • Committee for the Future neutral unanimous 24.4.02 • Finance neutral unanimous 26.4.02 • Employment and Equality neutral unanimous 26.4.02 • Commerce committee report positive 12 – 5 16.5.02 • Parliament discussion • debate 21-23.5.02 • voting positive 107 – 92 24.5.02

  11. Time schedule targets of the project • Progress according to the application: • Start of the construction work in the middle of this decade • New unit in commercial operation by the end of this decade • Time schedule targets for the next few years: • Invitation of firm bids during 2002 • Selection of plant type and location by the end of 2003 • Construction permit from the Council of State by the end of 2004

  12. Progress scheme for the new NPP 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  13. Waste Management in Finland • Interim storage of spent fuel • Loviisa 1983 • Olkiluoto 1987 • Final repository for low and intermediate level waste • Loviisa 1997 • Olkiluoto 1992 • Final repository of spent fuel • Olkiluoto site selected 1999 • Government Decision in Principle ratified by the Parliament in May 2001

  14. 1983 - 1985 Screening and identification of potential investigation sites 1986 - 1992 Preliminary site investigations 1993 - 2000 Detailed site investigations 2001 Decision in Principle for selected site (Olkiluoto) 2001 - 2010 Investigation shaft - construction and studies 2010 - 2020 Construction of final disposal repository and incapsulation plant 2020 Start of final disposal Schedule for Site Selection and Final Disposal of Spent Fuel

More Related