1 / 23

NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center & *Environmental Modeling Center Camp Springs, MD 20746

Impact of High-Frequency Variability of Soil Moisture on Seasonal Precipitation. Song Yang, S.-H. Yoo R. Yang*, K. Mitchell*, H. van den Dool, and R. W. Higgins. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center & *Environmental Modeling Center Camp Springs, MD 20746. Table of Contents. Motivation

breck
Download Presentation

NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center & *Environmental Modeling Center Camp Springs, MD 20746

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impact of High-Frequency Variability of Soil Moisture on Seasonal Precipitation Song Yang, S.-H. Yoo R. Yang*, K. Mitchell*, H. van den Dool, and R. W. Higgins NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center & *Environmental Modeling Center Camp Springs, MD 20746 Table of Contents Motivation Model and experiments Results, explanations, & summary Future work

  2. Motivation Yang and Lau (1998; J. Climate)

  3. 2. Model and experiments 2. Model and experiments 2. Model and experiments Model resolution: 32-km in horizontal; 45 levels in vertical Model domain: 10N-90N, 164W-58W Noah Land Model 2.3, with 4 soil layers Implemented in Operational NCEP Eta Model Implemented in NCEP Regional Reanalysis Boundary conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II Initial conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II U.S. Air Force daily analysis of snow depth Initial land states data: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II (in experiment Eta (GRII)) NCEP Regional Reanalysis (in experiment Eta (R/R)) Starting months: December in Eta (GRII) April in Eta (R/R) Length of integrations: 9 months in Eta (GRII) 4 months in Eta (R/R) # of ensemble members: 5 Sea surface temperature, surface albedo, and greenness: Updated daily Data of verifications: NCEP Regional Reanalysis NCEP Land Data Assimilation System NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center Unified Precipitation Global Telecommunications Model resolution: 32-km in horizontal; 45 levels in vertical Model domain: 10N-90N, 164W-58W Noah Land Model 2.3, with 4 soil layers Implemented in Operational NCEP Eta Model Implemented in NCEP Regional Reanalysis Boundary conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II Initial conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II U.S. Air Force daily analysis of snow depth Initial land states data: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II (in experiment Eta (GRII)) NCEP Regional Reanalysis (in experiment Eta (R/R)) Starting months: December in Eta (GRII) April in Eta (R/R) Length of integrations: 9 months in Eta (GRII) 4 months in Eta (R/R) # of ensemble members: 5 Sea surface temperature, surface albedo, and greenness: Updated daily Data of verifications: NCEP Regional Reanalysis NCEP Land Data Assimilation System NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center Unified Precipitation Global Telecommunications Model resolution: 32-km in horizontal; 45 levels in vertical Model domain: 10N-90N, 164W-58W Noah Land Model 2.3, with 4 soil layers Implemented in Operational NCEP Eta Model Implemented in NCEP Regional Reanalysis Boundary conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II Initial conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II U.S. Air Force daily analysis of snow depth Initial land states data: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II (in experiment Eta (GRII)) NCEP Regional Reanalysis (in experiment Eta (R/R)) Starting months: December in Eta (GRII) April in Eta (R/R) Length of integrations: 9 months in Eta (GRII) 4 months in Eta (R/R) # of ensemble members: 5 Sea surface temperature, surface albedo, and greenness: Updated daily Data of verifications: NCEP Regional Reanalysis NCEP Land Data Assimilation System NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center Unified Precipitation Global Telecommunications Model NCEP Eta Regional Climate Model Resolution: 32-km in horizontal; 45 levels in vertical Domain: 10N-90N, 164W-58W Noah Land Model 2.3, with 4 soil layers Implemented in Operational NCEP Eta Model Implemented in NCEP Regional Reanalysis Boundary conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis Initial conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis U.S. Air Force daily analysis of snow depth Initial land states: NCEP Regional Reanalysis

  4. 2. Model and experiments 2. Model and experiments 2. Model and experiments Model resolution: 32-km in horizontal; 45 levels in vertical Model domain: 10N-90N, 164W-58W Noah Land Model 2.3, with 4 soil layers Implemented in Operational NCEP Eta Model Implemented in NCEP Regional Reanalysis Boundary conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II Initial conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II U.S. Air Force daily analysis of snow depth Initial land states data: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II (in experiment Eta (GRII)) NCEP Regional Reanalysis (in experiment Eta (R/R)) Starting months: December in Eta (GRII) April in Eta (R/R) Length of integrations: 9 months in Eta (GRII) 4 months in Eta (R/R) # of ensemble members: 5 Sea surface temperature, surface albedo, and greenness: Updated daily Data of verifications: NCEP Regional Reanalysis NCEP Land Data Assimilation System NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center Unified Precipitation Global Telecommunications Model resolution: 32-km in horizontal; 45 levels in vertical Model domain: 10N-90N, 164W-58W Noah Land Model 2.3, with 4 soil layers Implemented in Operational NCEP Eta Model Implemented in NCEP Regional Reanalysis Boundary conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II Initial conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II U.S. Air Force daily analysis of snow depth Initial land states data: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II (in experiment Eta (GRII)) NCEP Regional Reanalysis (in experiment Eta (R/R)) Starting months: December in Eta (GRII) April in Eta (R/R) Length of integrations: 9 months in Eta (GRII) 4 months in Eta (R/R) # of ensemble members: 5 Sea surface temperature, surface albedo, and greenness: Updated daily Data of verifications: NCEP Regional Reanalysis NCEP Land Data Assimilation System NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center Unified Precipitation Global Telecommunications Model resolution: 32-km in horizontal; 45 levels in vertical Model domain: 10N-90N, 164W-58W Noah Land Model 2.3, with 4 soil layers Implemented in Operational NCEP Eta Model Implemented in NCEP Regional Reanalysis Boundary conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II Initial conditions: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II U.S. Air Force daily analysis of snow depth Initial land states data: NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis II (in experiment Eta (GRII)) NCEP Regional Reanalysis (in experiment Eta (R/R)) Starting months: December in Eta (GRII) April in Eta (R/R) Length of integrations: 9 months in Eta (GRII) 4 months in Eta (R/R) # of ensemble members: 5 Sea surface temperature, surface albedo, and greenness: Updated daily Data of verifications: NCEP Regional Reanalysis NCEP Land Data Assimilation System NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center Unified Precipitation Global Telecommunications Experiments Period: May-August of 1988 and 1993 Starting months: April Length of integrations: 4 months Number of ensemble members: 5 SST, surface albedo, and greenness: Updated daily Data of verifications: NCEP Regional Reanalysis; NCEP Land Data AssimilationSystem; CPC Unified Precipitation; and Global Telecommunications Soil moisture as surface boundary forcing in sensitivity experiments: 3-hourly means Daily means Weekly means

  5. Results I: Control Runs Model-observation comparison

  6. Precipitation (1993-1988) Eta RR CPC

  7. Surface Temperature (1993-1988) Eta RR GTS

  8. Soil Moisture (1993-1988) LDAS data from Dr. Yun Fan

  9. Results II: Sensitivity Experiments Roles of diurnal cycle & sub-synoptic variability of soil moisture Soil moisture as surface boundary forcing: 3-hourly means Daily means Weekly means

  10. Ts JJA 1988 Precip 3 Hourly 3H-Daily 3H-Weekly

  11. T850 Ts 3 Hourly 3H-Daily 3H-Weekly JJA 1988

  12. 3 Hourly 850-mb Winds JJA 1988 3H-Daily 3H-Weekly

  13. Precip of JJA 1993 Precip of JJA 1988 3 Hourly 3H-Daily 3H-Weekly 3H-Weekly

  14. Ts of JJA 1988 Ts of JJA 1993 3 Hourly 3H-Daily 3H-Weekly

  15. T850 of JJA 1988 T850 of JJA 1993 3 Hourly 3H-Daily 3H-Weekly

  16. 3 Hourly JJA 1988 JJA 1993 3H-Daily 3H-Weekly

  17. Explanations

  18. Summary • Reasonable performance by Eta • Impact of sub-synoptic soil moisture variability • HF var. of soil moisture changes seasonal means of precip. • Different roles between 1988 and 1993 • Importance of diurnal cycle • Dynamical consistence • Explanation (water and heat fluxes, instability, etc.)

  19. Future Work Impact of the spatial structure of soil moisture

More Related