130 likes | 369 Views
Controlling biofouling of pond aerators on marine prawn farms. CRC project application 2011. David Mann AgriScience Qld, DEEDI. Aerator biofouling project. Interest across industry No ‘off-the-shelf’ practical method available no areas have proactive system (cheap labour o/s) Aims
E N D
Controlling biofouling of pond aerators on marine prawn farms CRC project application 2011 David Mann AgriScience Qld, DEEDI
Aerator biofouling project • Interest across industry • No ‘off-the-shelf’ practical method available • no areas have proactive system (cheap labour o/s) Aims • Reduce production costs • Reduce the ‘pain-in-the-arse’ factor • difficulty in organising staff & resources to do the job
What is the problem? Preliminary info from farms – questionnaire • Main culprits - barnacles, tubeworms and algae • Dominant foulant varies by farm & year • Fouling costs • Labour - de-fouling • Moving, scraping, pressure cleaning • Electricity use • Lower electrical efficiency (~50%) • Lower oxygenation efficiency (??) • Maintenance - more frequent/earlier replacement • Productivity losses (risk / unrealised) • Biofouling cost - ~$1k per ha per crop
Aerator biofouling Results from questionnaire • 8 to10x 2hp (1.5kW) aerators /ha peak • Paddlewheels make up 50 to 60% of aeration fleet • Paddlewheels – greatest fouling impact • Typically aerators on 24h a day • At peak around 6,000 aerators across industry • Type of fouling varies by farm and year to year
Aerator biofouling control • Biofouling affects all of the paddlewheel above and below the waterline • Zones • Blades (algae, barnacles) • below water-line surfaces (all) • Surfaces above water line (algae>barnacles) Algae Algae Algae, barnacles Algae Barnacles, tubeworms, algae
Project Outline 1. Status of biofouling • Data for determining most effective strategy • Aerator fouling characteristics • Cost to industry • Practical measurements • efficiency of aerators affected by varying levels of fouling • Oxygen transfer rate (SOTR) • Aerator electrical efficiency (SAE)
Project Outline 2. Options for pond aerators • Antifouling - big business / huge R&D effort • Aquaculture – shellfish and seacage finfish benefited • Coatings - biocides, various surface properties (‘fouling release’), anti-settlement chemicals • Ultrasound • Sacrificial / replaceable covers • Equipment design and materials • Light reducing cover
Project Outline 3. On-farm tests • Short list of control options (farm assessed) • Practical comparison of different options • Info on • Costs (direct / indirect) • Practical implementation • Durability/effective period
Project Outline 4. Information supply • Make sure all information gets to farms who want it in a useful form • Practical and economic data • make informed strategic choice
Project status • Seafood CRC submission • Negotiating through project development process • Hoped that work will start ASAP in the coming season
Biofouling control selection criteria • Commercial readiness – ie not developing new system • No APVMA issues – not restricted • Cost effective – cost of implementation significantly less than current de-fouling approach
21 weeks Biofouling control selection • inert fouling release products / attachment inhibitory surfaces • range of waxy and silicon based compounds