200 likes | 494 Views
GOAL-LINE TECHNOLOGY . CONNOR LENNON. BACKGROUND. Result from years of controversial calls in Professional soccer GoalControl Dirk Broichhausen. TECHNOLOGY. 14 Cameras 7 in each goal Once ball passes goaline , vibration sent to referees watch within seconds. Many early prototypes
E N D
GOAL-LINE TECHNOLOGY CONNOR LENNON
BACKGROUND • Result from years of controversial calls in Professional soccer • GoalControl • Dirk Broichhausen
TECHNOLOGY • 14 Cameras • 7 in each goal • Once ball passes goaline, • vibration sent to referees watch within seconds • Many early prototypes • GoalControlchoosen for final company
Test Criteria • The GLT applies solely to the goal line and only to determine whether a goal has been scored or not • The GLT system must be 100% accurate • The indication of whether a goal has been scored must be immediate and automatically confirmed within one second
PRICING $260,000 per stadium to install $3,900 per game to operate
THE ARGUMENT ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Slowing the pace down Technology not always reliable Malfunction Loss of confidence in referees Price • Much less conflict • Not affected by weather • More accurate then human decision • Later investments
PERSONAL OPINION YES!
REFERENCES Pilcher, Tom. Premier League set to adopt goal line technology. Yahoo Sports, 9 April. Web. 10 April. 2013.http://sports.yahoo.com/news/soccer-premier-league-set-adopt-goal-line-technology-090643724--sow.html “FIFA appoints goal line technology provider for Brazil 2013.” FIFA. FIFA Online, 9 April. 2013. Web. 10 April. 2013. http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/organisation/marketing/qualityprogramme/news/newsid=2 051971/index.html Whittall, Richard. Who and what is GoalControl. ESPN Blog, 3 April. 2013. Web. 10 April.2013. http://espnfc.com/blog/_/name/espnfcunited/id/4727?cc=5901 Google Images