250 likes | 449 Views
NSPCS 08. Unified centrality measure of complex networks. Soon-Hyung Yook , Sungmin Lee, Yup Kim Kyung Hee University. Overview. Introduction interplay between dynamical process and underlying topology centrality measure shortest path betweenness centrality random walk centrality
E N D
NSPCS 08 Unified centrality measure of complex networks Soon-Hyung Yook, Sungmin Lee, Yup Kim Kyung Hee University
Overview • Introduction • interplay between dynamical process and underlying topology • centrality measure • shortest path betweenness centrality • random walk centrality • biased random walk betweenness centrality • analytic results • numerical simulations • special example: shortest path betweenness centrality • First systematic study on the edge centrality • summary and discussion
Underlying topology & dynamics • Many properties of dynamical systems on complex networks are different from those expected by simple mean-field theory • Due to the heterogeneity of the underlying topology. • The dynamical properties of random walk provide some efficient methods to uncover the topological properties of underlying networks Using the finite-size scaling of <Ree> One can estimate the scaling behavior of diameter Lee, SHY, Kim Physica A 387, 3033 (2008)
Underlying topology & dynamics • Diffusive capture process • Related to the first passage properties of random walker Nodes of large degrees plays a important role. exists some important components [Lee, SHY, Kim PRE 74 046118 (2006)]
Centrality • The simplest one: degree (degree centrality), ki • Centrality: importance of a vertex and an edge • Node and edge importance based on adjacency matrix eigenvalue • [Restrepo, Ott, Hund PRL 97, 094102] • Closeness centrality: • Shortest path betweenness centrality (SPBC) • bi: fraction of shortest path between pairs of vertices in a network that pass through vertex i. • h(j): starting (targeting) vertex • Total amount of traffic that pass through a vertex • Random walk centrality (RWC) • Essential or lethal proteins in protein-protein interaction networks
Various centrality and degree– node importance • Node (or vertex) importance: • defined by eigenvalue of adjacency matrix PIN email AS • [Restrepo, Ott, Hund PRL 97, 094102]
Various centrality and degree– closeness centrality PIN Nodes having high degree High closeness • [Kurdia et al. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop, 2007]
Shortest Path BetweennessCentrality (SPBC) for a vertex • SPBC distribution: • [Goh et al. PRL 87, 278701 (2001)]
SPBC and RWC • SPBC and RWC [Newman, Social Networks 27, 39 (2005)]
Random Walk Centrality • RWC can find some vertices which do not lie on many shortest paths [Newman, Social Networks 27, 39 (2005)]
Motivation Centrality of each node Related to degree of each node Any relationship between them? Dynamical property (random walks) Related to degree of each node
Biased Random Walk Centrality (BRWC) • Generalize the RWC by biased random walker • Count the number of traverse,NT, of vertices having degree k or edges connecting two vertices of degrees k and k’ • NT: thebasic measure of BRWC • Note that both RWC and SPC depend on k
Relationship between BRWC and SPBC for vertices The probability to find a walker at nodes of degree k • In the limit t Thus • For scale free network whose degree distribution satisfies a power-law P(k)~k-g • NT(k) also scales as • Average number of traverse a vertex having degree k • Nv(k): number of vertices having degree k
Relationship between BRWC and SPBC for vertices • SPBC; bv(k) • thus, • But in the numerical simulations, we find that this relation holds for g>3
Relationship between BRWC and SPBC for vertices b=1.3 b=1.0 n=5/3 n=2.0 b=0.7 n=1.0
Relationship between BRWC and SPBC for edges • for uncorrelated network • number of edges connecting nodes of degree k and k’ • thus • By assuming that
Relationship between BRWC and SPBC for edges 0.77 3.0 0.66 4.3
Protein-Protein Interaction Network Slight deviation of a+1=n and b=n/h=a/h
Summary and Discussion • We introduce a biased random walk centrality. • We show that the edge centrality satisfies a power-law. • In uncorrelated networks, the analytic expectations agree very well with the numerical results. • , • In real networks, numerical simulations show slight deviations from the analytic expectations. • This might come from the fact that the centrality affected by the other topological properties of a network, such as degree-degree correlation. • The results are reminiscent of multifractal. • D(q): generalized dimension • q=0: box counting dimension • q=1: information dimension • q=2: correlation dimension … • In our BC measure • for a=0: simple RWBC is recovered • If a; hubs have large BC • If a- ; dangling ends have large BC
Relationship between BRWC and SPBC for vertices • Mapping to the weight network with weight • Kwon et al. PRE 77, 066105 (2008) • Therefore, NT(k) also scales as • Average number of traverse a vertex having degree k • Nv(k): number of vertices having degree k