1 / 6

Drive Beam Generation - (toughts about) 500 GeV c.m. options

Drive Beam Generation - (toughts about) 500 GeV c.m. options. 241 ns structures. Case 2: Structure CLIC_502 500GeV: <E a >=80MV/m, N=6.8x10 9 => P in = 74.2MW . Adjust drive beam current & energy to produce 2x74 MW per PETS instead of 2x64 MW (nominal at 3TeV)

brenna
Download Presentation

Drive Beam Generation - (toughts about) 500 GeV c.m. options

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Drive Beam Generation - (toughts about) 500 GeV c.m. options

  2. 241 ns structures • Case 2: Structure CLIC_502 • 500GeV: <Ea>=80MV/m, N=6.8x109 => Pin = 74.2MW. • Adjust drive beam current & energy to produce 2x74 MW per PETS instead of 2x64 MW (nominal at 3TeV) • 500GeV: N=6.8x109, Pin = 64MW => <Ea>=73MV/m. • Collision energy is lower (456GeV) • 3TeV: N=3.72x109, Pin = 64MW => <Ea>=82MV/m, • reduced gradient in the part of the main linac • Make different ramping of the pulse for beam loading compensation (filling time is different in CLIC_G and CLIC_502) • Case 4: Structure CLIC_504 • 500GeV: <Ea>=80MV/m, Pin = 64MW => N=5.7x109. • Reduced luminosity • 3TeV: N=3.72x109, Pin = 64MW => <Ea>=87MV/m, • reduced gradient in the part of the main linac but still higher than for CLIC_502 • Make different ramping of the pulse for beam loading compensation (filling time is different in CLIC_G and CLIC_504)

  3. Case 2: Structure CLIC_502 • <Ea>=80MV/m, (Bunch population 3.7  6.8 109) • HDS power : 64  74.2 MW Alexej • Drive Beam current : 101  109 A • Drive Beam energy : 2.48  2.57 GeV Small adjustments of PETS length & or PETS R’/Q possible e.g. R’/Q 2295  2122 W/m • Drive Beam current :  113 A • Drive Beam energy :  2.47 GeV

  4. Parameters of 483 ns structures for 500 GeV

  5. 483 ns structures • In both cases: • Doubling pulse length means combination factor 12 instead of 24 but higher charge per bunch in drive beam • DB linac : Higher current compromises efficiency versus cost: Different structures or lower efficiency ? (but maybe not if you do off crest acceleration effectively reducing R’/Q) • Deccelerators: Lower energy and double bunch spacing of DB: Stability issue ? Ramping for beam loading compensation? • Case 5: Structure CLIC_G • 500GeV: <Ea>=80MV/m, N=3.3x109 => Pin = 42.1MW. • Same structure as for 3 TeV • 3TeV: Nominal • Case 6: Structure CLIC_506 • 500GeV: <Ea>=80MV/m, N=4x109 => Pin = 50.1MW. • Higher luminosity • 3TeV: N=3.72x109, Pin = 64MW => <Ea>=93.7MV/m, • lower gradient in the part of the main linac • Make different ramping of the pulse for beam loading compensation (filling time is different in CLIC_G and CLIC_506)

  6. Case 6: Structure CLIC_506 • <Ea>=80MV/m, (Bunch population 3.7  4 109) Pulse length241  483 ns double pulse scheme • HDS power : 64  50 MW Alexej • Drive Beam current : 101  90 A • Drive Beam energy : 2.48  2.12 GeV Drawbacks: higher charge per bunch ?

More Related