1 / 23

Good Afternoon/Introductions

Good Afternoon/Introductions. Missoula’s LRTP Process. Envision Missoula Report. Cost and Revenue Analysis. Missoula Growth Workshop. Public Survey. Final Public Review of Plan (Open House). Modeling. Ranking Criteria. Base Case Scenario. Modeling.

brenna
Download Presentation

Good Afternoon/Introductions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Good Afternoon/Introductions

  2. Missoula’s LRTP Process Envision Missoula Report Cost and Revenue Analysis Missoula Growth Workshop Public Survey Final Public Review of Plan (Open House) Modeling Ranking Criteria Base Case Scenario Modeling Fiscally Constrained 2035 Planning Scenario Envision Missoula Summit 4 Project Lists Draft Plan Document Final Plan Document Architecture Scenario 2035 Planning Scenario LRTP Project Report Modeling Modeling Vision Scenario Envision Missoula Workshops Planning Summit Report

  3. Public Involvement • Visioning workshops November 13, 14, 15 • Planning Summit February 13, 14 • Explored the land use/transportation relationship

  4. Public Survey • Conducted by University of Montana • Shows key priorities of public • What improvements they found most important

  5. Public Survey (cont.)

  6. What Are the Best Transportation Improvements?

  7. Roadway Expansion Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects Transit Operating and Capital Investments Enhancements for other Modes Operations Maintenance Intersection Improvements ITS Potential Transportation Projects

  8. Why Are We Here? • We are here to define needs for the LRTP in light of what we have learned up to this point. At this point needs may be FUNDED or UNFUNDED. Funding and prioritization will come later in the process What project are defined as “Needs”

  9. Project Categories • Current Needs (today’s deficiencies) • Accruing Needs (things we will need by 2035) • Illustrative Needs (things we will need after 2035) • “Parking Lot” (things we probably won’t need, given the public visioning process and land use/development directions)

  10. Where Do LRTP Projects Come From? • Have are derived from multiple sources: • Existing project lists from Public Agencies • Envision Missoula • Needs Created by Future Development • Safety Consultations • Other ideas

  11. Project Source – Visioning:“Business as Usual “Future

  12. Project Source – Visioning:“Satellite Centers” Future

  13. Project Source – Visioning:“Focus Inward” Future

  14. Project Source – Future Development (2035)

  15. Project Source – Future Development (Next 100,000)

  16. Today’s Traffic (2005)

  17. Future Traffic 2035

  18. Future Traffic (Beyond 2035)

  19. Project Source -- Safety Consultations • Friday April 4 • Missoula County Engineering • Higgins-Hill-Beckwith • Reserve/Mullan Safety & Congestion • Reserve St Corridor Safety & Congestion • Desmet Interchange Safety Improvement • Palmer St Signal • Safety Improvement SW Missoula

  20. Project Source -- Safety Consultations • Missoula County Education/Behavioral • SKSC Education Programs (DUI & seatbelt focus) • TV & Radio PSAs (designated drivers & buckle up) • Responsible Alcohol Training (servers) • Child Passenger Safety (training & inspection) • Bait & Belt Campaign (seatbelt rewards) • Home Free Missoula (cab rides home) • Your Choice 2007 (DUI re-inactment)

  21. Project Source -- Safety Data • MT high crash locations include: • US 93 north & south of Missoula • I-90 east and west of Missoula • US 12 from US 93 to Lolo Pass • Ped crashes inside city steady to decreasing, outside city trending up • Bike crashes inside city steady but high, outside city steady • Motorcycle crashes inside and outside city slowly increasing in context of rapid increases statewide

  22. Needs will be costed against available revenue to define the “funding gap” Needed projects will be prioritized for funding using criteria from the public survey & public involvement Those with the highest score will be recommended for funding Recommended “service package” will be reviewed for key environmental issues Recommended service package will be modeled with respect to travel demand and air quality Next Steps

More Related