130 likes | 214 Views
Planning for Performance Measurement: Choosing the Right Performance Measures for the Right Program Presenters: Donald Johnson, DSG, Inc Stephen Gies, DSG, Inc. Objectives. Participants will be able to identify proposal review basics
E N D
Planning for Performance Measurement: Choosing the Right Performance Measures for the Right Program Presenters:Donald Johnson, DSG, IncStephen Gies, DSG, Inc
Objectives • Participants will be able to identify proposal review basics • Participants will be able to identify critical proposal elements related to performance measures • Participants will be able to plan the next proposal review period and incorporate the performance measurement requirements
Basics of Grant Review • Identify Review Team • Preliminary proposal Review • Evaluation Criteria • Discussion and Consensus • Final Scoring and Notifications
Workshop Assignment • Two proposals to be reviewed • Review only two sections • Score individually • Discuss and come to consensus • Be prepared to report out
Proposals • Proposal A – Shelbyville • Proposal B – Springfield
Time Allotment • Individual reading of sections and notes – 20 minutes for both proposals • Small group discussions at table (5-7 members) – 20 Minutes • Report out – 20 Minutes
Forms • Individual Scoring Form • Small Group Scoring Form
Assignment – Part 1 • Individual reading of sections and notes – 20 Minutes for both proposals
Assignment – Part 2 • Small group discussions at table (5-7 members) – 20 Minutes
Assignment – Part 3 • Report out – 20 Minutes • Report outs should include: - Scoring - Consensus Comments
Springfield • Coherent plan utilizing current research • Specifies a detailed and realistic goal • Reallocates resources rather than obtain new funding • Utilizes a validated screening assessment tool • Details a collaborative relationship with MOUs already in place • Differentiates mandatory from non-mandatory measures • More frequent data collection periods
Shelbyville • Program details not clear and no discussion of current research • No validated instruments • Minimal levels of collaboration • No differentiation between mandatory and non-mandatory • Lacks a sufficient number of measures • Less frequent data collection periods
Summary Key points in quality data collection plan for performance measurement: • Meet minimum requirements regarding all mandatory measures and two non-mandatory measures • Specify data collection instruments • MOUs have been undertaken to obtain needed data • Final Scoring and Notifications