1 / 10

Proposal to Allocate Remaining 2010 Funding

Proposal to Allocate Remaining 2010 Funding. RTF November 2, 2010. Process. Budget Check (About $110K uncommitted) Identify Project Options Consult Work Plan Met with Operations Committee Develop Staff Proposal RTF Consideration & Decision. Budget Snap Shot: As of 29 October 2010.

brian
Download Presentation

Proposal to Allocate Remaining 2010 Funding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proposal to Allocate Remaining 2010 Funding RTF November 2, 2010

  2. Process • Budget Check (About $110K uncommitted) • Identify Project Options • Consult Work Plan • Met with Operations Committee • Develop Staff Proposal • RTF Consideration & Decision

  3. Budget Snap Shot: As of 29 October 2010

  4. Project Options Considered

  5. Considerations • Near-term ability to develop SOW & contract • Immediacy of need • Opinion of RTF committees & staff • Estimated Cost • Details: Fall 2010 Allocating Proposal.xlsx

  6. Staff Recommendations

  7. Proposal • Direct staff to initiate scopes of work and contracts for recommended projects • Total package up to remaining 2010 budget (approx $110,000) • Approve sole source recommendation for work identified for SBW • Allow staff the flexibility to mix and match among projects depending on final scope and cost estimates

  8. Spare

  9. Test RTU Signature Protocol on Heat Pumps • Add heat pumps (HPs) with web-enables T-Stat • Anomalous performance data on 10 HP in BPA project • Research Questions: How well will protocol work on HP systems? • Sufficiency of daily average temp • Many months with AM heating & PM cooling • Other HP-specific issues? • Propose to install monitoring on a new site • 3 HPs for initial 24 months • Potential ETO site in Beaverton, OR • 20,000sf veterinary hospital, each HP serves single zone • Data to be added to Regional RTU Research Results Database • Analysis: Similar to previous, added report for heat pump-specific issues and findings

  10. RTU Signature Protocol Test for Heat Pump Systems

More Related