1 / 15

FY 2013 Reducing and Reallocating

Fiscally. PREPARED. FY 2013 Reducing and Reallocating. How Did We Get Here?. September State R evenue F orecast / Governor's Budget P roposal (Nov, 1, 2012) Worst case scenario No cuts, no increase Better case Increase in funding Best case Increase in SBB Increase in compensation.

brit
Download Presentation

FY 2013 Reducing and Reallocating

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fiscally PREPARED FY 2013Reducing and Reallocating

  2. How Did We Get Here? • September State Revenue Forecast / Governor's Budget Proposal (Nov, 1, 2012) • Worst case scenario • No cuts, no increase • Better case • Increase in funding • Best case • Increase in SBB • Increase in compensation

  3. How Did We Get Here? • Cost of Business Savings in 2011/12 • Budget Items adjusted • Funded 1% one time stipend • Funded one time SBB increases • Reallocated dollars (1% ongoing raise) • Projected costs adjusted for next year • $2.2 M PERA • Health insurance increases • Fuel costs

  4. How Did We Get Here? • Central Office (12 M) • Doing more with less • Prioritizing work with Strategic Plan • HS Schedule (3.5 M, portion back one time) • MS (.5 M, replaced one time) • Contract Negotiations (2 M)

  5. Central Leadership Team FTE2008 - 2013 Over 10 FTE decrease (18%) since 2010 20 FTE decrease (30%) since 2008

  6. Central Leadership Team Compensation2008 - 2013 * *Includes district-wide 3% increase

  7. Senior Cabinet Savings(Part of the Leadership Team Savings) Since 2010, saved over $100,000 yearly

  8. Some Examples of Central Leadership Reductions / Reallocations

  9. DCSD Support Services In 2010, In 2013

  10. Central Leadership Team Compensation Dollars 2.8 M Cumulative savings since 2010 Over $750,000 savings in 2013 over 2010 inclusive of the 1% salary increase and the 2% retention stipend Leadership Team Reorganization savings in the first year: Over $900,000 2011 over 2010 and decreased again in 2012

  11. PK-12 Education 2009 - 2013 10 to 7 Asst. Supt / Exec. Dir. / Directors Reorganization of K-12 Education to PK-12 incorporating Early Childhood, SPED, Health Services, Student Leadership 2 to 1 Early Childhood Coordinators 2 to 1 Special Education Directors

  12. Focusing on the Identified Priorities of the Strategic Plan

  13. Focusing On Instruction • Curriculum • Development and implementation of GVC – District Wide Curriculum did not exist • Driving good instruction through identified world class education targets • Assessment • Development and implementation of BAS • Core Area Interim Assessments Developed • Ready for SB-191 implementation • Aligned / Targeted Professional Development

  14. Support Services Successes 2011 - 2013 Wide Area Network & Personal Device Initiative Special Education MOE & Charter Purchased Services Capital Asset policies and procedures Increased Business Process Efficiencies & clarity Partnering with Charters providing classroom spaces – COP policy and implementation

  15. Human Resources 2011-2013 Reforming DCSD Compensation Practices Eliminated the practice of paying the Senior Cabinet employee’s portion of PERA Implementing Market Based Pay for Certified Employees Reforming Pay for Performance – Pay for teaching DCSD students not for years of service and taking classes Implementing Short Term Disability Insurance Reforming pay practices associated with responsibility pay

More Related