580 likes | 722 Views
Blazars & GRBs. The fastest macroscopic objects of the Universe. Gabriele Ghisellini INAF-Osservatorio di Brera. G. < b app >~10 < G > > 10. Lister+ 2013. Fermi FSRQs. G. Earlier on: isotropic explosion. Later: energy crisis + collapsar scenario. G. G. G.
E N D
Blazars & GRBs The fastest macroscopic objects of the Universe Gabriele Ghisellini INAF-Osservatorio di Brera
<bapp>~10 <G> > 10 Lister+ 2013 Fermi FSRQs G
Blazars: collimation 1/G 1/G G G qjet G GRBs: collimation qjet G
Blazars: collimation 1/G 1/G G G qjet G GRBs: collimation qjet G
L ~ L’ G4 Blazars 1/G G G qjet G GRBs G L ~ L’ (G/qjet)2
G=constt2 0 Molinari+ 2007
G decreasing t-a 0 Molinari+ 2007
1/8 tpeak Ek,iso G ~ 3 n tpeak 0 Molinari+ 2007
Ghirlanda+ 2012 Liang+ 2012
L>0.01LEdd Within RBLR UBLR= const Within RTorusUIR= const Big blazars RTorus Torus ~1-10 pc G RBLR disk Broad Line Region ~0.2 pc
L<0.01LEdd SSC only weak cooling BL Lacs G BLR <<0.2 pc “ADAF disk”
FSRQs: emission lines many seed photons BL Lacs: no or weak lines G G Rdiss
FSRQs BL Lacs G G Rdiss FSRQs BL Lacs BL Lacs FSRQs
FSRQs FSRQs BL Lacs BL Lacs G G BL Lacs FSRQs
Collimation corrected GRBs blazars Nemmen+ Science 2012 Collimation corrected
GRBs Fermi blazars, one p per e-
Jet launching Internal pressure or magnetic field?
Jet opacity: blazars tT,0 = sTno R tT,0 ~ 0.5 no from Mout Jet opacity: GRBs 3/4 Pjet,51 1 Pjet aT04 tT,0 ~ 1015 ~ n+ 1/2 G1 LEdd M1 kT0
Jet launching In GRBs we have 2 possibilities: - internal pressure: the huge optical depth traps photons inside - magnetic field In blazars: - internal pressure: the optical depth is small - magnetic field
Jet launching In GRBs we have 2 possibilities: - internal pressure: the huge optical depth traps photons inside - magnetic field In blazars: - internal pressure: the optical depth is small - magnetic field Magnetic field: - Produced and amplified by the disk - Link with accretion
Blandford & Znajek UB ~ rc2 @ Rs This explains why Pj ~ Ld B ~ 1015-1016 G in GRBs B ~ 104 G in blazars B ~ 109 G in galactic superluminals And yet: - Jets are not magnetically dominated in the emission region -very rapid PBPkin - the “right” amount of matter to have ~same G for all jets
EC Small B synchro torus disk X-ray corona
Fermi FSRQs Power in cold protons (1 per emitting e-) Power in rel. electrons Power in Poynting flux Power in radiation (model indipendent) Disk luminosity
Mout/Min for blazars and for GRBs Pjet = GMoutc2 Ld = hMinc2 for blazars:
Mout/Min for blazars and for GRBs Pjet = GMoutc2 blazars Ld = hMinc2 for blazars: h Pjet Min Mout ~ 10-2 = G Ld
Mout/Min for blazars and for GRBs Pjet = GMoutc2 blazars Ld = hMinc2 for blazars: h Pjet Min Min Mout Mout ~ 10-2 = = G Ld for GRBs: 0.1 MO Min ~ tburst Ek52 Ek ~ 5.5x10-4 G2 G c20.1 MO
Blazars: the redder the more powerful cooling “Ghirlanda” Epeak [keV] “Amati” GRBs: the bluer the more powerful heating?? G? E[erg]
Conclusions Jets are the most efficient engine of Nature Compare jet power and Ldisk as a function of the accretion rate. Normalize to Eddington.
Late prompt in GRBs? 1644+57?
GBRs blazars
The“blazarsequence” FSRQs Fossati et al. 1998; Donato et al. 2001 BL Lacs BAT Integral
FSRQs Line strength Fossati et al. 1998; Donato et al. 2001 BL Lacs
FSRQs Next talk by Meyer M/MEdd Fossati et al. 1998; Donato et al. 2001 BL Lacs
Narayan & Yi 1995: LBLR/LEdd ~ 10-3 Sharma+ 2007: LBLR/LEdd ~ 10-5 SDSS+1LAC EW>5A 5x10-4 Sbarrato+ 2011 EW<5A M-s;Plotkin+ 2011 Do we really need to divide blazars?
MBH=2x109 Fermi EC G synchro UVOT XRT GG, Tavecchio & Ghirlanda 2009 torus X-ray corona disk SSC Low energy synchro peak: leave the disk naked!
MBH=1010 BAT
The jet cannot have less power than what required to produce the observed luminosity: Lobs Pjet > G2 If Pjet is twice as much, G halves. We can take that as the minimum Pjet. This limit is model-independent.
GG/2 Pj.min = 2Lobs/G2
1 proton per electron no pairs Having pairs would reduce Pjet. But where are they created?