1 / 8

[add speaker’s name]

UCET Conference 2007. [add speaker’s name]. [add date]. UCET Conference 2007. The development and implementation of a new approach to the inspection of initial teacher education. Christine Brown ADM 9 November 2007. The need for a new approach and key drivers.

Download Presentation

[add speaker’s name]

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UCET Conference 2007 [add speaker’s name] [add date]

  2. UCET Conference 2007 The development and implementation of a new approach to the inspection of initial teacher education Christine Brown ADM 9 November 2007

  3. The need for a new approach and key drivers • Inspection arrangements focused on driving improvement • Recognise provision of the highest quality • Reduce the burden of inspection • Inspections focused on promoting the qualities that the workforce will require in the 21st Century • Focus on outcomes and the views of ‘end-users’

  4. The proposals • Focus on outcomes • Maximise use of provider self-evaluation • Develop a ‘tailored and risk-based approach’ drawing on wide range of data and information • Explore the possibility of a single inspection event

  5. The key questions • What is the quality of outcomes for trainees? • How effective are the factors that contribute to the outcomes? • Does the provider have the capacity to improve further or to sustain high quality outcomes?

  6. RISK ASSESSMENT TAILORED INSPECTIONS HIGH Based on risk assessment, with due regard to: • provider’s self-evaluation • previous inspection outcomes/ available data • the size and complexity of the provision • the number and nature of identified ‘inspection trails’. MEDIUM Tailored through: • the number of ‘inspection trails’ to be followed up on the inspection • the timing of the inspection – the stage of the course • the size and nature of the core inspection team • the number and nature of ‘case studies’ needed – the number of ‘team inspectors’. LOW A risk assessment process

  7. DATA PROFILE SENT TO PROVIDER OTHER EVIDENCE INFORMS SELF-EVALUATION INSPECTION PLANNING THE NATURE OF THE INSPECTION PRE-INSPECTION HYPOTHESES AND LINES OF ENQUIRY Tailoring inspections • Identify those aspects of the provision that need to be inspected, including the focus for field work, to judge each of the key inspection questions • Determine the initial ‘inspection trails’ – the key lines of enquiry • Determine the size and nature of the core inspection team and any additional resources, such as specialist inspectors (phase, subject etc.)

  8. Christine Brown Christine.brown@ofsted.gov.uk

More Related