90 likes | 227 Views
Country case study Mali Koulouba - Bamako – dougou (village) Worlds apart. Case study - results. Context Paris Process: Achievements and characteristics Political economy and actors Main challenges for donors in the political economy context Donor options Main theses for debate.
E N D
Country case studyMali Koulouba - Bamako – dougou (village)Worlds apart
Case study - results • Context • Paris Process: Achievements and characteristics • Political economy and actors • Main challenges for donors in the political economy context • Donor options • Main theses for debate
Context • Test case for aid harmonization in 1999 (OECD/UNDP) - failed • Aborted national process of National Development Strategy 2000replaced by PRSP (HIPC conditionality) • Some of the highest donor density in Africa • Lack of data (eg. Debate on UNDP HDI) • Donor presence in reform of core function of statehood:public service, financial management, decentralization
Paris Process: Achievements and characteristics Main structures: • Commision Mixte / cadre de coordination • Pool technique du PTF (donor) • PRSP/CSLP cellule • General Budget Support Group, Sector Budget Support Group • PD action plan, Secretariate de harmonisation Future structures • Joint Country Assistance Strategy (SCAP) • Division of labour / complimentarity • Mechanism to display mutual accountability
Political economy and actors • Parliament: weak; consensual politics; new era 2007? • Cour de Comptes, Verificateur General, Civil Service • Civil Society: starting to engage in overseeing public policies; uncoordinated umbrella organizations; no self-governance standards; • Decentralization: political and administrative
Main challenges for donors • “The horse before the cart”: Unsequenced PRSP elaboration – before evaluation of 1st PRSP, before presidential elections in 2007 • “Theatre meats bureaucracy”: Presidential aim: increase aid; parallel discourse and policy (PDES) to PRSP/CSLP; Lack of govt leadership in policy definition • Extreme complexity of multi-dimensional coordination structure • “Stock exchange”: Disconnection between Bamako reports and rural realities • “Main entrance and backdoor”: Bypassing of budgetary and central planning structures by donors • “Subversive ownership”: Donor lead in formulation, country ‘proceed’ in implementation, general rupture between formal definitions and informal practice • “time horizon”: Disbursement pressure vs. Absorptive capacities
Donor options • Political dialogue: Beyond the executive! • Involvement of donors in strengthening parliament; • Advocacy function of civil society • Strengthening decentralised bodies (admin / representation) • Joint Country Assistance Strategy (SCAP) • Deconcentration / Delegation to country offices • Definition of comparative advantage • Analytical capacities • From project-evaluation to political analysis • Linking migration with political development
Main theses for debate • Charismatic presidential discourse, technical donor approach and rural realities are disconnected • By recruitment policies and parallel implementation units, donors distort the development of effective state institutions and a critical general public • Accountability needs measurability & visibility (access to valid information) • 40 years of development aid have not left behind capacities • Limits of aid dependence? (3/4 of investment budget is externally funded)