1 / 17

G_CaL vs. k_naca

G_CaL vs. k_naca. Eli Cohen Josue Cordones Sviatoslav Kendall CMACS Workshop 2013. Knaca : Sodium/Calcium Exchanger. Expels one Calcium ion (Ca2+) from the cell by pulling in three Sodium ions (Na+) Net effect: inside of the cell becomes more positive with each turn

brock
Download Presentation

G_CaL vs. k_naca

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. G_CaL vs. k_naca Eli Cohen JosueCordones SviatoslavKendall CMACS Workshop 2013

  2. Knaca: Sodium/Calcium Exchanger • Expels one Calcium ion (Ca2+) from the cell by pulling in three Sodium ions (Na+) • Net effect: inside of the cell becomes more positive with each turn • Restores calcium concentration after action potential

  3. Gcal: Maximal Calcium Conductance • Directly proportional to L-type Calcium current (Ical) • [insert equation] • Affects slow, inward current that serves to sustain action potential

  4. Predictions: • High Gcal values should give long action potentials • Low Knaca values should also give long action potentials • Longest action potentials should be seen with high Gcal and low Knaca

  5. Methods:

  6. Methods…

  7. Results • Spiral seemed to always migrate leftward • No apparent trend in either the paths or the spirals. In all cases if undisturbed the spiral would eventually migrate off the screen. • No apparent difference between Day 1 and Day 2

  8. Day 1 Paths

  9. Day 2 Spirals

  10. Comparison of Close-ups Day 1 Day 2

  11. Action Potential at the Extremes (1.8, 1.8) (0.2, 1.8) (0.2, 0.2) (1.8, 0.2)

  12. Insights • Changing parameters may have affected the path of the spiral tip. • Maybe not…could be that it’s not the values of the parameters that affects the path, rather the position of spiral when changing values serves as initial conditions for the new set of parameters. • But…if that’s true, that means the new set of parameters does have some effect on the spiral, but we couldn’t find a trend.

  13. Undisturbed at (1.0, 1.0)

  14. Action Potential at the Extremes (1.8, 1.8) (0.2, 1.8) (0.2, 0.2) (1.8, 0.2)

  15. Future…

  16. Acknowledgements (check spelling) • Flavio Fenton, • Robert Gilmour, • Bard Ermentrout, • Nancy Griffeth for putting it all together • Aaron Wolinetz for logistical/moral support (food/jokes) • Chuck, Rachel & Daniel for being there • Peter for his programming prowess

More Related