1 / 18

Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011

Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011. Day 2 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 4. Plan. Syntactic movement Theta theory (syntax meets semantics). S --> NP VP VP --> V (NP) NP --> (A) (ADJ) N. Transformational grammar. Chomsky (1957, 1965)

brody
Download Presentation

Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Language and CognitionColombo, June 2011 Day 2 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 4

  2. Plan • Syntactic movement • Theta theory (syntax meets semantics)

  3. S --> NP VP VP --> V (NP) NP --> (A) (ADJ) N Transformational grammar • Chomsky (1957, 1965) • Two stages phrase structures for a sentence • Build DeepStructure • Build from phrase structure rules • One constituent at a time • Convert to SurfaceStructure • Built from transformations that operate on the deep structure • Adding, deleting, moving • Operate on entire strings of constituents

  4. Passive transformation rule: • NP1 + V + NP2 ---> NP2 + be + V + -en + by + NP1 Transformational grammar • 1 deep structure, 2 surface structures: • Active/passive sentences: • The man bit the dog. • The dog was bitten by the man. • 2 deep structures, 1 surface structure: • Sherlock saw the man with binoculars

  5. Syntactic movement • The sailor is kissing the girl • Who is the sailor kissing? • The sailor is kissing who • Who is the sailor tis kissing tthe girl/who?

  6. NP NP VP VP VP VP NP NP PP PP Psycholinguistic evidence for trace • evidence for reactivation of moved constituent at the trace position in the garage Deep structure Surface structure S S The car was put the car in the garage was put (trace) probe Some “activation” of car Movement transformation

  7. Cross modal priming experiments

  8. I to C movement Bruce can play the didgeridoo. Can Bruce play the didgeridoo? He might annoy the neighbours. Might he annoy the neighbours? He has lost his mind. Has he lost his mind? The earplugs are helping. Are the earplugs helping? • In each of the derived questions above, the auxiliary verb {can, might, has, are}has moved from its original position to the front of the sentence • This kind of movement, previously referred to as ‘Subject-Auxiliary Inversion’, is now described as I to C movement

  9. I to C movement • Notice that S = IP • C is a functional head that has a projection higher than the level of the sentence • The moved element is shown with an arrow attached, linking it to its original position • The trace of movement is marked with a t

  10. Under the old system…

  11. What about empty Infl? • Insertion of a dummy auxiliary – a placeholder

  12. Multiple movements

  13. Let’s do one together…. • Using either PS rules or the X-bar style trees, draw diagrams for the following sentences, showing the movement: • The boy ate the apple • Did the boy eat the apple? • What did the boy eat?

  14. Introduction to theta theory • Sentence = predicate (an expression denoting an event or a state) and a set of arguments (the participants in the event) • The arguments of a verb = the subject and object • Complements of verbs = objects: they are positioned inside the first projection of the V, so they are called internal arguments • Subjects are positioned outside the verb’s first projection, so they are called external arguments • But arguments can be understood in different ways – they play different roles in the events denoted by the predicate •  a typology of thematic roles

  15. Thematic roles • Theme or Patient: entity undergoing the effect of some action Maryfell over • Agent or Causer: the instigator of some action Johnkissed Mary • Experiencer: entity experiencing some psychological state Billfelt sad • Recipient or Possessor: entity receiving or possessing something Mary got Johna gift • Goal: entity towards which something moves John went home

  16. Mapping • It’s not enough to “know” (implicitly) what the structure of a sentence is • We also have to know how to interpret the structure • So we need knowledge of thematic roles • Thematic roles are assigned in structural relations – e.g. the Verb assigns a thematic role (usually Theme) to its complement • Items in other positions get other thematic roles – Agent is usually in specifier position near the verb (sister to a higher projection) • Some lexical items assign specific thematic roles – e.g. prepositions like by

  17. Mapping • This all becomes very important when we look at grammatical knowledge in aphasia • Theta-roles: assignment of interpretive roles to syntactic objects subject verb object Grammatical roles John kissed Mary Theta roles • Non-canonical word order  reliance on grammatical structure object verb subject John was kissed by Mary • To be continued….. Agent Patient Agent?? Patient??

More Related