450 likes | 708 Views
Cognitive Orientation and Management: Predicting and Changing Behavior in Management. Shulamith Kreitler, Ph.D. Department of Psychology Tel-Aviv University Tel-Aviv, Israel. Tel: +972-3-5227185 Fax: +972-3-5225371 E-mail: Krit@netvision.net.il.
E N D
Cognitive Orientation and Management:Predicting and Changing Behavior in Management Shulamith Kreitler, Ph.D. Department of Psychology Tel-Aviv University Tel-Aviv, Israel Tel: +972-3-5227185 Fax: +972-3-5225371 E-mail: Krit@netvision.net.il
What is Cognitive Orientation and what it can do for management?
Reasons for the complexity of management behavior: • Multiplicity of goals, contexts, teams interacting, combining, replacing each other at unpredictable rates. • Constant dependence on and need to respond adequately to external circumstances over which one has little or no control. • Constant evaluation by external standards that could lead to lowered status up to the point of being fired. • Requirement for creativity coupled with the need to conform to reality-conditioned circumstances • Absence of any specific behavior which could be identified as demonstrating good management.
Three approaches to overcoming the difficulties of management: • Shaping external reality (markets, consumers, other businesses) • Shaping internal reality (within the business itself, employees, atmosphere) • Shaping management: Selecting and Training individuals with the adequate potential
Three common, possible approaches to overcoming the difficulties of management: • Shaping external reality (markets, consumers, other businesses) • Shaping internal reality (within the business itself, employees, atmosphere) • Shaping management: Selecting and Training individuals with the adequate potential We are going to focus on shaping management. There have been many theoretical and applied approaches to selecting managers.
Common approaches to selecting managers: • Focusing on characteristics considered to be relevant for the position, e.g., • Considering the job requirements (stimulus properties), e.g., elegance, expertise, verbal ability • Considering the personality (response properties), e.g., self-esteem, flexibility, locus of control
Common approaches to selecting managers: • Level of characteristics • General: e.g., Adaptors versus Innovators (Kirton), Leadership, Emotional intelligence • Specific: e.g., Ability to concentrate under noise conditions Readiness to get specific instructions for performance
Common approaches to selecting managers: • Means of assessment • Self-report • Peers evaluation • Supervisors’ evaluation • Verbal • Behavioral • General items • Situational items
Major shortcomings of the common selection procedures • Too specific Limited to particular context job behavior needs • OR
Major shortcomings of the common selection procedures • Too general Do not relate to any particular context job behavior needs
Major shortcomings of the common selection procedures • Selection not coordinated with training
Principles of selection on the basis of cognitive orientation • Selecting on the basis of a set of characteristics • Selecting in view of multiple needs • Selecting on the basis of motivational tendencies (and not traits) • Selecting on the basis of tendencies related directly to behavior • Selecting on the basis of tendencies related to a broad spectrum of behaviors in a given domain • Selecting on the basis of motivational tendencies that allow for change and training • Selection and training open to extension to any preferred type of manager
Cognitive Orientation Theory Developed in 1962 Hans Kreitler and Shulamith Kreitler • A theory for • understanding • predicting • changing behavior
Cognitive Orientation Theory Developed in 1962 Hans Kreitler and Shulamith Kreitler • A body of data – in regard to • predicting behavior • changing behavior • conceptual and empirical tools generated by the theory
Cognitive Orientation Theory Developed in 1962 Hans Kreitler and Shulamith Kreitler • A methodology – for • predicting behavior • changing behavior in desired direction
Cognitive Orientation Theory Developed in 1962 Hans Kreitler and Shulamith Kreitler • Major domain of application - • Molar behaviors • Cognitive behaviors • Health behaviors • Medical disorders • Psychopathological disorders • Emotional behaviors
Basic Assumption of the Cognitive Orientation Theory : Cognition plays an active-dynamic role in regard to behavior
Cognitive Orientation Theory(Kreitler & Kreitler) Major Theses : • Behavior is a function of a motivational disposition (=directionality of behavior) and performance Motivational disposition (Where to?) Performance (How?) Behavior • Cognition affects behavior by contributing differentially to motivation and performance • The cognitive impact is neither conscious nor voluntary
The rationale for the impact of cognitions on behavior is their meaning-based relation to behavior
Cognitive Orientation Theory Major Stages “Question” Process “Answer” INPUT 1. What is it? Meaning Action Unconditioned or conditioned response 2. What does it Meaning Generation Action required mean in general and to me? 3. What action? 4 types of beliefs; Behavioral Intent CO Cluster 4. How to perform Program Retrieval; Behavioral Program action? Planning OUTPUT
Input identified Input dealt with Behavioral Program Input Meaning action Reflex, CR, etc. Exit What is the input? Input identified for molar action Input not identified Input not dealt with What does it mean for me? Exit Action not required Action required What action? Behavioral Intent 4 types of beliefs: Cog. Orientation Cluster How to perform action? Behavior
Four Types of Behavioral Programs • Innately determined programs e.g., reflexes • Programs determined partly innately and partly by learning • e.g., instincts, language • Programs acquired through learning • e.g., culturally shaped behaviors (running elections, etc.) or personal habits (making friends, relaxing, etc.) • Programs constructed by the individual ad hoc
Structure of Beliefs BELIEFSUBJECTRELATION Self I Factual Norms non-I Desirable Goals I Desired General non-I Factual
Examples of the Four Types of Beliefs • Beliefs about self: • “I am an easy-going person” • “I often lie” • “I hate disorder” • Beliefs about goals: • “I wish to be a tough person” • “I would like to be free of any obligations” • “I want to be loved by everybody”
Examples of the Four Types of Beliefs • Beliefs about rules and norms: • “One should never lie” • “People ought to consider first of all their own interests” • “Don’t ever expect to be loved by everybody” • General beliefs: • “It is impossible to do everything to perfection” • “Obligations weigh heavily on most people” • “Most people lie even to their friends”
Identifying Themes by Meaning Generation Interpersonally-shared meaning of behavior or disorder Key-words Level 1 :Personal meanings of key-words Level 2 :Personal meanings of responses on level 1 Level 3 : Personal meanings of responses on level 2
Examples of Themes Themes of Achievement : • Rejection of limitations • All facts can be changed • All results depend on the individual • Strength of the individual • Commitment Themes of Punctuality : • Acceptance of limitations • Compromising concerning one’s needs • Concern with controlling events and situations
Beliefs about Self Beliefs about Norms Beliefs about Goals General Beliefs Themes 1) 2) 3) : n) . Predictive Matrix of Beliefs
Beliefs about Self Behavioral Intent Beliefs about Norms Beliefs about Goals General Beliefs
Predicting Behavior on the Basis of the CO Theory • Constructing a CO questionnaire for the behavior of interest • Administrating the CO questionnaire, examining the availability of the behavioral program and assessing the behavior • If the behavioral program is available, then Examining the relations between the scores of the CO questionnaire and the behavior, in terms of • CO index scores (0-4) Analyses of variance • Continuous scores for the 4 belief types Regression or Discriminant Function Analyses
Behavior Predictions on the basis of the CO Theory • Speed of performance (schizophrenics) • Reactions to success (IQ 50-60) • Reactions to failure (IQ 50-60) • Responsiveness to tangible an intangible rewards (IQ 50-60) • Quitting smoking • Undergoing tests for the early detection of breast cancer • Accuracy • Pain tolerance • Compliance with treatment regimen (diabetics) • Communicability • Cleanliness (schizophrenics) • Taking medication (schizophrenics) • Paranoid reactions (schizophrenics) • Rigidity (IQ 50-60) • Achievement • Being late • Responses to success • Responses to failure • Conformity • Assertiveness • Curiosity • Impulsivity • Handling stress • Orderliness • Intolerance of ambiguity • Planning • Applying different defense mechanisms
Cognitive Orientation of Creativity: CLUSTERS OF THEMES • Openness to the environment, to possibilities, to others, curiosity • Openness to one’s inner world, one’s experiences, emotions • Playfulness, imagination, fantasy, thinking freely about problems, freedom from limited functionality • Emphasis on the application of ideas, making things work, changing things in reality • Focus on the self, one one’s internal world, investing in the self, exploring the self, remaining faithful to oneself • Readiness to contribute to the public welfare, doing things for the public, awareness of social and public issues • Freedom, cognitive freedom, insistence on doing things one’s own way • Need for firm framework, ability to conform to regulations and instructions • Openness to others, sharing emotions with others • Social shyness, readiness to differ from others, readiness to do one’s thing regardless of good or bad evaluation on the part of others
Cognitive Orientation of Creativity: CLUSTERS OF THEMES • Sticking to internal standards of excellence, without compromising, readiness to sacrifice a lot in order to attain one’s goals as one sees them • Emphasizing one’s uniqueness, original contribution • Dynamism, becoming, moving ahead, changing • Readiness to make efforts, work hard, invest in whatever one is doing • Readiness for risk-taking, and functioning under uncertainty • No or low limiting boundaries between different domains (private and public, personal and interpersonal, subjective and objective, work and family, moral and esthetic)
Cognitive Orientation of Marketing and Salesmanship Orientation • Development of the individual (or of a unit such as, family or society) entails expansion of needs • Needs need to be satisfied (it is socially and psychologically healthy to satisfy needs) • Loving oneself means doing things for yourself (such as, purchasing) • Satisfying needs promotes one’s independence • When you produce and sell you promote openness, free flow; Freedom consists in openness, free flow
Study on Creativity in Management • Participants: 62 managers 40 men, 22 women Mean age : 41.6 High-tech businesses • Dependant variable: Creativity in management Rating on 1-7 scale Rated by supervisors Rated by co-managers Rated by subordinates
Study on Creativity in Management • Predictors: Cognitive orientation – • 4 belief types • Themes • Regression analysis: R2 = .85 Order of contributing factors : Goals .97 Norms .92 General .90 Self .84
Study on Creativity in Management Major contributing themes • Openness to environment • Openness to inner world • Emphasis on application • Readiness to contribute to public welfare • Dynamism • Risk-taking, uncertainty
Further predictions based on applying the CO questionnaire of creativity: • Creativity in resolving engineering problems • Participants: 120 engineers in different employments • Creativity in resolving interpersonal conflicts in the plants • Participants: 28 supervisors in plants producing construction materials • Creativity in design • Participants: 25 design experts in advertisement (rating of products)
Study on team-work • Participants: 51 managers 30 men, 21 women Mean age : 37.4 Pharmaceutical and electricity businesses • Dependant variable: Team-work functioning Rating on 1-5 scale Mean rating by team members No. of raters per subject: 3-5
Study on team-work • Predictors: Cognitive orientation – • 4 belief types • Themes • Regression analysis: R2 = .82 Order of contributing factors : Norms .95 Goals .91 Self .88 General .80
Study on team-work • Correspondence between cognitive orientation scores of team-work: • Cognitive Orientation (CO) scores : 0 – 4 • Correspondence : Assessed in terms of gaps [absolute numbers] • Range of gaps: |4| |3| |2| |1| • Participants: • 15 teams 2-5 members per team • Variables for each team: • Correspondence in CO scores (mean) • Cohesion of team (mean of ratings) • Correlation coefficient : r = .70
Changing Behavior on the Basis of the CO Theory • Administering the CO questionnaire for the behavior of interest • Identifying the themes and belief types in which there are not enough supporting beliefs (“weak cells”) • Promoting belief evocation or construction in the “weak cells”, focusing on the themes • If an adequate behavioral program is not available, promote its acquisition
Advantages of the CO Theory • The CO theory is an empirically supported theory and methodology of predicting and changing behaviors • Each CO questionnaire predicts a broad range of behaviors in the relevant domain • May be applied to participants of different ages, cultures, and IQs • Applying the procedures of prediction or change does not require any “mind set” or other conditions and no addition of further variables • Procedures may be applied in regard to any behavior • Participants are unable to “adjust” responses to questionnaire to fit or not their behavior • Procedures of predicting and changing behaviors are related (i.e., economical)
Thank you for your attention