1 / 17

From Here to QEP

Learn about the QEP, its importance in SACS Accreditation, acceptable QEP criteria, sample topics, implementation process, and best practices. Follow the 10-step QEP process and understand what NOT to do. Get insights into forming a pre-planning team and timelines.

bronnerj
Download Presentation

From Here to QEP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. From Here to QEP Presented to University Senate Deanna Sellnow & Kaveh Tagavi November 9, 2009

  2. Why are we here? • To introduce QEP • Deliberate & transparent process • To propose a rough QEP timeline • To propose a pre-planning team (1st of 4 work groups in the process)

  3. What is a QEP? • Quality Enhancement Plan • A core requirement for SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: • “. . . a carefully designed course of action that addresses a well-defined and focused topic or issue related to enhancing student learning. The QEP should be embedded within the institution’s ongoing integrated institution-wide planning and evaluation process . . .” (SACS Handbook for Reaffirmation of Accreditation, 2007, p. 3)

  4. Why is a QEP now a SACS Core requirement? • To make the SACS reaffirmation of accreditation process less prescriptive and . . . • To give more control to institutions.

  5. How? • Previously, we prepared a comprehensive self-study to demonstrate compliance by responding to . . . • 463 MUST statements. • Now, we respond to . . . • 53 comprehensive standards • to earn compliance certification. • Part I (Compliance Report) Due: Sept. 2012 • Part II (QEP) Due: Jan. 2013

  6. An Acceptable QEP . . . • includes a broad-based institutional process identifying a key issue emerging from institutional assessment, • focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution, • demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP, • includes broad-based involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP, and • identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement. (SACS Core Requirement 2.12)

  7. Sample QEP Topics: • “Do the Right Thing: A Campus Conversation on Ethics” (Texas Tech Univ.) • “Enhancing Student Learning Through Improved Advising” (Louisiana State Univ.)

  8. More Sample Topics… • “Degrees of Excellence—Reconceptualizing the Core Curriculum” (Univ. of Alabama) • “Enhancing Student-Faculty Engagement” (Univ. of Virginia)

  9. More Sample Topics… • “The International and Intercultural Awareness Initiative” (Univ. of Tennessee) • “The Integrated Communication Initiative” (Webber International Univ.) • “Discovery Based Learning: Transforming the Undergraduate Experience Through Research” (University of Houston) • “The Student-Achievement Center: Enhancing Student Learning in a Comprehensive Service Center” (Louisiana Tech Univ.)

  10. What NOT To Do . . . Present the QEP as merely “another SACS hoop to jump through” Impose a QEP topic from the top down Submit a QEP topic that describes initiatives already fully realized Try to do too much

  11. 10-Step QEP Process: • Select the topic. • Define student learning outcomes. • Research the topic. • Identify actions to be implemented. • Establish an implementation timeline. • Describe the infrastructure for implementation and continuation of the QEP. • Identify resources. • Assess goal attainment. • Submit QEP document: January 2013. • Submit Impact Report: December 2017.

  12. Topic Selection Team-based Best Practices • QEP Pre-Planning Team Develop a topic selection plan and timeline • QEP Topic Identification Team Topic identification—ensure broad input • QEP Development Team Conduct research and write the plan • QEP Implementation Team Pre-implementation—baseline data & initial structures Implementation—manage QEP & resources

  13. QEP Process Thus Far. . . • SACS QEP workshop attendees conceived a topic selection pre-planning team & timeline • Reviewed and supported by the Provost • Presentations to UCAPP, Senate Council, & Deans’ Council for input & endorsement • University Senate approval

  14. Proposed Pre-Planning Team • SACS Workshop Attendees • Heidi Anderson, Mike Mullen, Rena Murphy, Deanna Sellnow, Kaveh Tagavi, Marsha Watson, and VP Constance Ray (ex-officio facilitator) • Four additional faculty members to be appointed by the University Senate Council

  15. Pre-planning Team • Workshop Attendees: Heidi Anderson, Mike Mullen, Rena Murphy, Deanna Sellnow (Co-Chair), Kaveh Tagavi, Marsha Watson, Constance Ray (ex-officio) • Additional Faculty Appointees: Ruth Adams, Gail Hoyt, Jane Jensen, Nels (Jeff) Rogers, Diane Snow (Co-Chair) • Yet to be named: • Student Affairs Representative • Student Representative

  16. Rough Timeline • Oct 2009: Brief Presentations • Nov 2009: Pre-Planning Team Established • Jan 2010: Topic Selection Plan Finalized • Feb 2010: Senate Approves Topic Selection Plan • Nov 2010: Senate Approves QEP Topic • Dec 2010: President Approves QEP Topic • Jan 2011: QEP Planning Committee Named • Jan-May 2012: QEP Vetted With Campus Community • Sept-Dec 2012: Final QEP Approval Process • Jan 2013: QEP Submitted to SACS • Dec 2017: Prepare Impact Report

  17. Go CATS! Questions? Comments?

More Related