700 likes | 1.33k Views
Shaping . Chapter 8. Simple Reinforcement. Before: Andrew has no gum. Behavior Initial: Andrew moves his lips. After: Andrew receives gum. Differential Reinforcement. Reinforcement. Behavior Intermed: Andrew makes croaking sound. After: Andrew receives gum. Before:
E N D
Shaping Chapter 8
Simple Reinforcement Before: Andrew has no gum Behavior Initial: Andrew moves his lips After: Andrew receives gum
Differential Reinforcement Reinforcement Behavior Intermed: Andrew makes croaking sound After: Andrew receives gum Before: Andrew has no gum Behavior Intermed: Andrew moves his lips After: Andrew receives no gum Extinction
Differential Reinforcement Reinforcement Behavior Terminal: Andrew says “gum” After: Andrew receives gum Before: Andrew has no gum Behavior Intermed: Andrew makes croaking sound After: Andrew receives no gum Extinction
Process of Shaping • Used when the response is not currently in the repertoire • Is used as an intervention • We don’t shape people, we shape responses
Operant Level • The frequency of responding before reinforcement
Terminal Behavior • Behavior not in the repertoire or not occurring at the desired rate; • This is the goal of the intervention
Shaping Behaviors • Initial behaviors • Intermediate behaviors
Initial behavior • Behavior that resembles the terminal behavior along some meaningful dimension and occurs with at least a minimal frequency
Intermediate behaviors • Behavior that more closely approximates the terminal behavior
The procedure of shaping with reinforcement • The differential reinforcement of only that behavior that more and more closely resembles the terminal behavior
Shaping with Reinforcement Reinforcement Behavior Initial: Andrew moves lips Intermed: Andrew makes croaking sound Terminal: Says words clearly After: Andrew receives gum Before: Andrew has no gum Behavior Initial: NA Intermed: Moves lips only Terminal: Says words unclearly After: Andrew receives no gum Extinction
Shaping with punishment • The differential punishment of all behavior except that which more and more closely resembles the terminal behavior
Variable-outcome shaping • Shaping that involves an increase in the magnitude of a reinforcer or a decrease in the magnitude of an aversive outcome as performance more and more closely resembles the terminal behavior
Variable Outcome Shaping Quicker Reinforcement Behavior Initial: forceful Intermed: very forceful Terminal: superforceful After Initital: Rattle in 10-sec Intermediate: Rattle in 6s Terminal: Rattle in 4s Before: Rod has no rattle in his hand Behavior Initial: weak force Intermed: forceful Terminal: very forceful After Initial: no rattle Intermed: Rattle in 10s Terminal: Rattle in 6 sec Slower Reinforcement
Fixed outcome shaping • Shaping that involves the delivery of a fixed magnitude of a reinforcer, when performance meets the changing criterion, • or the delivery of a fixed magnitude of an aversive outcome, when performance fails to meet the changing criterion.
R1 R5 R2 R6 SR SR A B R3 R7 R4 R8 Operant Classes Differential Reinforcement
Shaping • “Creates” new behavior (creates classes) • adds responses to an individual’s repertoire • Differential reinforcement of successive approximations
Shaping • Artificial (i.e., deliberate)
Deliberate Shaping • Select a final target behavior • Measure current distribution (baseline) • Differentially reinforce an approx. • Diff. reinf. new approx. • Place previous approx. on EXT • Continue until target behavior occurs
Eckerman et al. (1980) • Interested in developing principles of shaping • Two questions • Step Size? • How fast (i.e., step rate)?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Nominal Operant Class Induction (Response Generalization) Functional Operant Class
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Large Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Large Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Large Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Large Steps
Eckerman et al. (1980)Independent Variables • Step Size = Change in distance each step • Step Rate = How long at each step
Eckerman et al. (1980)Dependent Variable • Accuracy • Percentage of pecks at target locations
Eckerman et al. (1980)Results • Accuracy was unaffected by step size or step rate • Just as accurate with large steps and a criterion that changes rapidly • Under these conditions, relatively large steps and relatively rapid change are best
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Small Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 v v Small Steps