1 / 108

Psychology of Discrimination

Psychology of Discrimination. Sendhil Mullainathan Economics 1035 Fall 2007. Psychological Approach. Key distinction from Economic Model: Care about mechanism and not just behavior

brooke-levy
Download Presentation

Psychology of Discrimination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Psychology of Discrimination Sendhil Mullainathan Economics 1035 Fall 2007

  2. Psychological Approach • Key distinction from Economic Model: • Care about mechanism and not just behavior • Even if two psychological mechanisms produce identical behavior for all practical purpose, psychologists still care • Interested in deep structure issues.

  3. Three types of Discrimination • Prejudice • “I don’t like them” • Stereotyping • “I know their type” • Implicit Discrimination • “I favor equal treatment”

  4. Defining Prejudice • Prejudice Hostile or negative attitude toward a group (relative or absolute terms)

  5. Universal Theory of Prejudice • Prejudice not limited to deviants • Ingroup favoritism is a fundamental human tendency • Sherif classic study

  6. Sherif Study • Ran a summer camp • All middle-class kids. White. 12 years old • Separated into two groups • Eagles and Rattlers • Groups had internal tension, “south siders” in the Rattlers • Initially group cohesion was low. Just a bunch of kids thrown together From the book The Robbers Cave Experiment: Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation by Muzafer Sherif

  7. Sherif Study • How would you introduce cohesion within the group? • Let them play games together in which the group must co-operate, separate from the other group • Treasure hunt, carrying a canoe to a certain location… • In-group cohesion followed

  8. Sherif Study • Now they needed to have an out-group. • They were introduced to the other group.

  9. Stereotyping • Cognitive in nature • Categorize people in to specific “types” • Jock • Cheerleader type • “Little pictures we carry around in our head”-Lippman • Psychologically important feature of stereotypes: • Under-rate within group variability • More differences between any two women than between Women and Men as a group

  10. Ingroup-Outgroups Revisited • Judd-Park did an experiment on 60 business and engineering majors • Subjects complete questionnaire with trait and attitude items • Some stereotypical of engineers • "I prefer a quiet evening of reading to a loud party,“ • "One of my favorite pastimes is solving brain teasers such as Rubik's Cube" • Some counter-stereotypical of engineers • “I often act on my gut feelings rather than analyzing a situation” • "I enjoy meeting new people and having a large number of acquaintances"

  11. Judd-Park • Each group judged how many of the other group would fit the characteristic • Interested in the perceived group variability of: • Own group • Other group

  12. Judd-Park

  13. Cognitive Mechanism • It appears through this and other research that: • People over-state ingroup variability • Under-state outgroup variability

  14. Bacon-eggs • Lion-eggs • Lion-tiger • Bacon-notebook • Lion-eggs • Lion-eggs • Bacon-eggs • Bacon-notebook • Blossoms-tiger • Boat-eggs

  15. Bacon-eggs • Blossoms-notebook • Blossoms-eggs • Blossoms-eggs • Lion-eggs • Bacon-tiger • Bacon-tiger

  16. Blossoms-eggs • Blossoms-eggs • Lion-eggs • Blossoms-tigers • Boat-eggs • Boat-notebook • Lion-notebook • Bacon-eggs • Bacon-tiger • Bacon-eggs

  17. Lion-tiger • Bacon-notebook • Blossoms-tiger • Boat-tiger • Bacon-tiger • Bacon-tiger • Bacon-eggs • Lion-eggs • Blossoms-notebook • Bacon-eggs • Boat-eggs • Boat-eggs • Lion-tiger • Lion-tiger • Lion-tiger

  18. Boat-tiger • Blossoms-eggs • Bacon-tiger • Lion-eggs • Blossoms-eggs • Lion-notebook • Boat-tiger • Lion-eggs • Boat-tiger • Bacon-notebook • Boat-notebook • Bacon-notebook • Blossoms-tiger • Blossoms-tiger • Blossoms-notebook • Lion-notebook • Bacon-tiger

  19. Boat-eggs • Bacon-notebook • Blossoms-notebook • Blossoms-tiger • Boat-tiger • Blossoms-notebook • Bacon-tiger • Boat-notebook • Boat-tiger • Blossoms-notebook • Lion-tiger

  20. Boat-eggs • Blossoms-notebook • Blossoms-tiger • Lion-tiger • Boat-tiger • Lion-notebook • Boat-tiger • Blossoms-eggs • Blossoms-notebook • Boat-eggs • Bacon-notebook • Boat-notebook • Lion-notebook • Lion-tiger • Boat-notebook • Blossoms-eggs

  21. Bacon-eggs • Blossoms-tiger • Boat-notebook • Lion-notebook • Boat-notebook • Boat-notebook • Bacon-notebook • Lion-notebook • Lion-notebook • Boat-eggs

  22. What percentage of times was lion paired with tiger? Blossoms with notebook? Boat with eggs? • When bacon was presented on the left, what % of time was eggs on the right? • Answer 33% -> in such studies, people overestimate and say nearly 50%

  23. Illusory Correlations • Expectancies can create illusory correlations (bacon-egg) • Paired distinctiveness (sharing of rare feature) can create illusory correlations (blossoms-notebook) • Proposed as one mechanism underlying stereotype development

  24. Persistence of False Stereotypes • A key finding in psychology is that false stereotypes can persist (and emerge) • Illusory correlations are an excellent explanation why • When faced with a mass of data, we “see” the correlations we expect to see.

  25. They Saw a Game • Dartmouth and Princeton students saw tapes of a Dartmouth-Princeton football game • Game gets very physical • Who started the rough play? • 86% of Princeton students say Dartmouth started it • 53% of Dartmouth students say both started it • 93% of Princeton students thought game was rough and dirty • Only 42% of Dartmouth students

  26. Explicit Bias vs. Implicit Bias • Explicit (conscious) attitudes poorly measured? • Beliefs sensitive to self-presentation concerns, social desirability • Pettigrew study at diners • Implicit measurement of attitudes and beliefs eliminates these concerns

  27. Implicit Bias • Attitudes and beliefs expressed outside of conscious awareness, intention, and control • Do not require introspection • Measurement requires indirect methods

  28. Implicit Measurement • Indirect methods (no surveys) • Often Reaction time-based • Semantic Priming • Implicit Association Test (IAT) • related concepts easier to pair (faster) than unrelated one

  29. awful terrible hatred failure vomit happy love peace friend joy

  30. START happy hatred awful LEFT KNEE RIGHT KNEE joy GOOD BAD friend terrible vomit love failure peace

  31. START LEFT KNEE RIGHT KNEE BAD GOOD happy hatred awful joy friend terrible vomit love failure peace

  32. LEFT KNEE RIGHT KNEE

  33. LEFT KNEE RIGHT KNEE

  34. START happy hatred awful LEFT KNEE BAD or RIGHT KNEE GOOD or joy friend terrible vomit love failure peace

  35. START happy hatred awful LEFT KNEE BAD or RIGHT KNEE GOOD or joy friend terrible vomit love failure peace

  36. Race IAT Overall: 70% pro-white, 21% pro-black White Ss: 75% pro-white, 16% pro-black Black Ss: 42% pro-white, 48% pro-black

  37. http://implicit.harvard.edu • Age • Gender • Race • Election • Presidents • Sexuality • Arab-Muslim • Weight • Religion • Disability • Native American • Asian American • Skin-tone • Country • Hindu-Muslim

  38. What does Implicit Bias Predict? • Nonverbal communication • Greater amygdala activation to subliminal presentation of Black faces relative to White faces

  39. McConnell-Liebold • Ss brought in for word perception task • Greeted by White female experimenter • Asked to sit in a rolling chair • “My shift is up” she says and black female experimenter shows up and continues in word perception task McConnell, A. R. and Liebold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes, 37 J. Experimental Social. Psychology. 435.

  40. Outcomes • Where do they place the chair? How closely do they seat. • Independent judges rate the interaction • Several judges are used. Why? • IAT done

  41. Correll et. al. • Subjects asked to play a simple video game • 80 times with 20 trials in each cell Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314-1329.

More Related