530 likes | 1.53k Views
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts. May 20, 2006 Didi Bahig, Rubina Chouhdary, Lina Couto, Daulat Ladak. Agenda. Company Introduction Strategy Analysis Accounting Analysis Ratio Analysis Simple Dupont Analysts’ Assumptions Forecasted Statements Actual Statements. Company Introduction.
E N D
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts May 20, 2006 Didi Bahig, Rubina Chouhdary, Lina Couto, Daulat Ladak
Agenda • Company Introduction • Strategy Analysis • Accounting Analysis • Ratio Analysis • Simple Dupont • Analysts’ Assumptions • Forecasted Statements • Actual Statements
Company Introduction • Founded in 1937 • Tasty high-quality doughnuts • IPO in 2000 for $5.50 offering price • April 2001 Stock Price $45.00 • Geographic expansion - 222 stores in 34 states by April 2002, 5 million donuts a day • Revenue Sources: • Company owned stores • Franchise Associates & Area Developers’ royalties • Sale of doughnut mixes & doughnut- making equipment
Strategy Analysis Group Discussion (Porter’s 5-Forces)
Strategy Analysis – Porter’s 5 Forces Buyer Power • Many donut stores • No affiliation High Effect on Profitability (Decrease)
Strategy Analysis – Porter’s 5 Forces Supplier Power • Basic ingredients • Readily available • Low costs to switch to other suppliers Low Effect on Profitability (Increase)
Strategy Analysis – Porter’s 5 Forces Barriers to Entry • Not much capital required for a mom & pop store, but substantial capital for big stores • Secret formula Low to Medium Effect on Profitability (Decrease)
Strategy Analysis – Porter’s 5 Forces Threat of Substitutes • Convenience foods • Other baked goods • Grocery stores High Effect on Profitability (Decrease)
Strategy Analysis – Porter’s 5 Forces Rivalry Among Exiting Firms • Fragmented Market • Several Players: • Dunkin Donuts – 2nd largest retailer • Winchell’s • Donut Connection • Honeydew Donuts High Effect on Profitability (Decrease)
Strategy Analysis – Company Strategy • 60s & 70s: high quality reputation • 90s: geographic expansion • New Area Developer Model • Increase sale of complementary product • Fall 2000: expansion into smaller & dense urban markets using smaller hot doughnut machine • Kept debt at minimum levels • Elected to purchase older franchised stores that showed growth potential
Accounting Analysis • Financial statements measure the economic activity • No red flags identified • Increasing amount of deferred compensation
Can the Area Developers generate profit? Revenues ($72 x 52 weeks) $3744 Gross Profit (est. 0.18 x 3744) $674 Royalties (0.045 + 0.01) x 3744 (206) Mark-up on KKM&D Purchases (114137 x 0.18) = 20545 Profit/Franchised Store (20545/143) (144) Capital Costs ($1.425 x est. 0.10) (142) Net per Store $182
Summary of Findings • High quality product • Industry analysis’ decreasing effect on profitability • Plan to increase coffee sales • High sales generated by new stores taper off • Small hot doughnut machine • Net Profit Margin & Financial Leverage are good • Stores can generate profit
Critique of Analysts’ Assumptions • Sales Growth – reasonable, is increasing but less than historical rate • NOPAT Margin – too high, should decrease due to increased competition • After-tax net interest rate on debt – reasonable, is increasing as they are taking on more debt
Assumptions about Key Drivers Group Discussion
Assumptions about Key Drivers • Sales Growth • NOPAT Margin • After-tax net interest rate on debt • Net operating working capital/sales • Net operating long-term assets/sales • Net debt/net capital