80 likes | 228 Views
Transgender Discrimination. What started the process to change gender?.
E N D
What started the process to change gender? Gender identity disorder or “GID” is a conflict between a person's physical gender and the gender he or she identifies as. For example, a person identified as a boy may actually feel and act like a girl. The person is very uncomfortable with the gender they were born. Gender identity disorder in children is considered clinically distinct from GID that appears in adolescence or adulthood, which has been reported by some as intensifying over time.
There are some places in the US where Transgendered discrimination in the workplace is still legal and some people still suffer from it. What some people are trying to do is justify this discrimination and prevent it from happening.
Being an already worldwide known word discrimination is not something that should be tolerated. This is the reason why there are more civilians losing their jobs or being harmed physically or mentally. In this case Vandy Beth Glenn was one of these unfortunate victims.
Vandy Beth Glenn worked for two years in the General Assembly’s Office of Legislative Counsel as an editor and proofreader of bill language. Glenn loved her job but privately struggled through years of unrelenting distress as a male. She was diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder (GID), a serious medical condition, and she prepared to undergo a course of professionally guided treatment that included gender transition. In 2007, Glenn informed her immediate supervisor, Beth Yinger, that she planned to proceed with her transition from male to female. Yinger passed the information on to the General Assembly’s Legislative Counsel, Sewell Brumby, who is the head of the office in which Glenn worked. After confirming that Glenn intended to transition, Brumby fired her on the spot. On July 22, 2008, Lambda Legal brought a federal lawsuit against Georgia General Assembly officials on behalf of Glenn, asserting that her firing violated the Constitution’s equal protection guarantee because it treated her differently due to the nonconformity with gender stereotypes that she evidenced by her determination to live in accordance with her female gender identity. In addition, General Assembly officials disregarded Glenn’s GID and her needed treatment—also an equal protection violation.
As this issue progressed Vandy Beth Glenn finally emerged victorious in this trial.