1 / 5

Meteorlogix Experience 2005 - 2006

Meteorlogix Experience 2005 - 2006. Kent Mayer Assistant chief Maintenance Engineer Nevada Department of Transportation Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS) 2006 Annual Stakeholder Meeting Falls Church, Virginia August 10-11, 2006. Background.

bruno-hyde
Download Presentation

Meteorlogix Experience 2005 - 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Meteorlogix Experience 2005-2006 Kent Mayer Assistant chief Maintenance Engineer Nevada Department of Transportation Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS) 2006 Annual Stakeholder Meeting Falls Church, Virginia August 10-11, 2006

  2. Background • 60 sites old DTN technology from 1996 to 2003 • 35 sites of new Weather Sentry technology • Stand alone sites not networked • Primarily at remote Maintenance stations that were dial-up to NDOT network.

  3. Weather Sentry online • Service available January 10, 2006. • 15 accounts established • 3 pavement forecast sites. • Only six of the accounts were utilized

  4. Advantages • Not tied to a fixed site • Accessible from alternate locations (home, other offices, wyfi) • Cost for increased flexibility less than paying for fixed system. • Added pavement forecasts that did not have from fixed system. • Rudimentary treatment options recommended

  5. Challenges • Service initiated late in the season. • Communications, planning, training and documentation. • Acceptance of new technologies. • Procedures on verification on pavement forecasts • Treatment options did not have what if capabilities.

More Related