1 / 17

Court of Justice: geographical balance not achieved

This article examines the implementation of the principle of geographical balance in the Court of Justice and highlights the concerns regarding the lack of geographical diversity in the institution. It discusses the imbalance in different sectors and suggests measures to address this issue.

Download Presentation

Court of Justice: geographical balance not achieved

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Understanding before taking action Court of Justice: geographical balance not achieved http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  2. The Commission submitted to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the implementation of the principle of geographical balance. From the outset, the Commission makes it clear that, “having regard to the underlying objective of the report, the analysis concerning the Commission will focus on the AD function group.” • EPSU CJ :This restrictive approach to the principle of geographical balance is very worrying. It means that any attempt to restore the attractiveness of the EU as an employer has largely been abandoned. • Indeed, as shown in our analysis dating from 2011, the lower the pay, the greater the geographical imbalance. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  3. A balance should be struck between: • the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality • and • recruitment on the broadest possible geographical basis Staff Regulations of Officials, Article 27 Recruitment shall be directed to securing for the institution the services of officials of the highest standard of ability, efficiency and integrity, recruited on the broadest possible geographical basis from among nationals of Member States of the Union. […] http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  4. The same rule also applies to other servants: Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, Article 12 (1) The engagement of temporary staff shall be directed to securing for the institution the services of persons of the highest standard of ability, efficiency and integrity, recruited on the broadest possible geographical basis from among nationals of Member States of the Union.. […] Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, Article 82 (1) Contract staff shall be selected on the broadest possible geographical basis from among nationals of Member States, […] Remarkably, Article 82(1) CEOS is not even mentioned in the Commission report. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  5. The position of the Court of Justice can be summarised as follows : http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  6. To better understand the causes of the imbalance, we have broken down the staff of the institution into three broad sectors which have different characteristics.  http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  7. First sector : Members’ Chambers • The pivotal workinglanguage of the EU courtsisFrench; • Each Member (Judge, Advocate-General) is free to compose his/her Chamber as he/she wishes. Members generally prefer native French-speaking legal secretaries (most often FR or BE), whereas other lawyers can operate just as effectively in French. Same applies to assistants. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  8. First sector : Members’ Chambers (continued) Members’ Chambers are the main source of geographical imbalance in the Institution. EPSU CJ: The Institution should raise Members’ awareness of the issue of geographical balance. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  9. Second sector: Multilingualism Here the picture changes significantly: for each official language of the Union a language section has to be formed. In most cases a language corresponds to a nationality. The fact therefore that the nationalities of smaller Member States are over-represented is justified. However, countries that share an official language with another country (CY, AT) are under-represented, as are NL vis-à-vis BE, due to the fact that Belgian Flemings are more familiar with FR language. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  10. Second sector: Multilingualism (continued) Without Multilingualism, geographical imbalance at the Court would have been even more serious. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  11. Thirdsector: Other Services French is not only the working language of the proceedings in court, but also, almost exclusively, the language of administration. The Court of Justice is the most francophone EU-institution. The substantive imbalance observed in Chambers (1st sector) also occurs, to a lesser extent, in the ‘Other Services’. It further seems that there is a correlation between career prospects and the level of knowledge of French. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  12. Third sector: Other Services (continued) In this part of the Institution, rebalancing measures must be taken, along with establishing English as the second language of the administration. Admittedly, while requiring the ability to work in three official languages, the Staff Regulations (Article 45 (1)) do not specify which. But, as in other institutions, one can reasonably expect staff members to operate effectively in EN and FR to the extent necessary for the performance of their duties. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  13. 3a contract staff • Due to the very low level of pay, recruitment is essentially local. For Luxembourg, this means in practice : • the main nationalities of immigrants: PT, FR, IT, BE • and • Cross-border workers from FR et BE. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  14. Court of Justice: an overall assessment Given that the salaries offered by the EU institutions are not particularly attractive for LU, where the labour market is largely made up of immigrants and cross-border workers, combined with the fact that LU does not add any EU official language to the existing ones, the “seat effect” for LU nationals is weak. However, the “seat effect” accounts for part of the over-representation of FR and BE nationals. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  15. Court of Justice: aggregate level http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  16. Court of Justice: Management posts http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

  17. Court of Justice: an overall assessment (continued) • BE and FR are over-represented due to the use of French as: • the working language of the courts and • the language used almost exclusively by the administration. • In addition to the UK, which has traditionally been under-represented and is now undergoing a traumatic process of withdrawing from the Union, the following are significantly under-represented: AT, NL, PL, ES, IT; last but not least, DE, even though it is a neighbouring country. •  Overall conclusion - It is mainly the language regime centred on French which accounts for chronic and structural geographical imbalance in the Court of Justice. • Understanding before taking action: EPSU CJ, the representative trade union at the Court of Justice, takes an approach which is the opposite of Propaganda : No conclusion set in advance, describing the facts, identifying what goes wrong and what needs to be changed. http://epsu-cj.lu/en/

More Related