240 likes | 412 Views
WHAT IS COMPULSION? . Mental health legislation establishes the circumstances in which a person with
E N D
2. WHAT IS COMPULSION?
Mental health legislation establishes the circumstances in which a person with ‘mental disorder’, who hasn’t committed a crime, can be detained or treated without their consent.
The criteria include:
Mental disorder
Danger to self or others
Incapacity to refuse treatment
3. WHAT IS RISK?
Possibility of harm, loss or danger
Factor involving uncertain danger, hazard
Risk is located in the future
4. APPROACHES TO RISK Cause of danger
The gods
Fate
Nature Response to danger
Supplication
Acceptance
Control
6. RISK AND MAD PEOPLE
INTRAPERSONAL RISK
Harm to self
Internalised stigma and hopelessness
People in contact with mental health services 20 times more likely to kill themselves than general population.
7. RISK AND MAD PEOPLE INTERPERSONAL RISK
Mad as perpetrators
Weak statistical correlation between madness and violence. Other factors are stronger such as age, history of violence, gender and substance abuse.
Mad as victims
Much more likely to be victims than perpetrators.
8. RISK AND MAD PEOPLE ENVIRONMENTAL RISK
As causes of madness
Trauma, deprivation, social inequality, loss
As consequences of madness
Trauma, deprivation, social inequality, loss
Social stigma and discrimination
Unsafe, unhelpful, coercive services
10. APPROACHES TO RISK AND MADNESS WIDER COMMUNITY
An unsustainable consensus
Mad people a risk to others
They cannot take responsibility for their actions
The community has ceded responsibility to services
Services entirely responsible for controlling risk
Mental health leaders collude with this consensus
The scene is set for the wide acceptance of compulsion
12. APPROACHES TO RISK AND MADNESS MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM
A contestable dominant paradigm
Compulsion supported by belief in biological pathology that destroys autonomy and needs correction with treatment.
Poor powers of prediction
Serious violence by mad people too rare to predict well
Debatable if compulsion reduces suicide rate
A narrow conception of risk
System driven by risk to institutional & professional reputation
Little regard for risks to consumers
14. COMPULSION - RISKS TO CONSUMERS DISCRIMINATORY CRITERIA IN MENTAL HEALTH ACTS
Danger to others
Preventive detention can happen despite no crime (only with mad)
Danger to self
Compulsion can happen despite competence (only with mad)
Competence
‘The criteria for non-voluntary treatment should focus on the mentally ill person’s capacity to understand that he or she is ill and the benefits that might result from treatment.’ Ryan et al
15. COMPULSION - RISKS TO CONSUMERS
INHUMANE TREATMENT
Hospitals
Experienced as unsafe and uncaring
Seclusion, restraints, forced injections
Experienced as re-traumatising and as punishment
16. COMPULSION - RISKS TO CONSUMERS
CORRUPT REVIEW PROCESSES
Review Tribunals processes
Intimidating and humiliating
Review Tribunal decisions
One in 20 applicants get off order in NZ
Language to justify decisions does not appear in Act in NZ
17. COMPULSION - RISKS TO CONSUMERS QUESTIONABLE TO HARMFUL OUTCOMES
Medications can be life-depleting and life-shortening
Compulsion re-traumatises and corrupts therapeutic trust
Undermines autonomy and creates overdependence
Compulsion lowers social status and increases stigma
‘Compulsory community treatment results in no significant difference in service user, social functioning or quality of life compared with standard care.’ Kisely et al. Cochrane Review
19. THE RISKS TO REFORM RECOVERY POLICY
National policies in all English speaking countries founded on recovery, but no reduction in compulsory treatment.
Compulsory treatment not compatible with recovery:
Self-determination and personal resourcefulness
Collaborative relationships (shared risk, positive risk)
Choice of services
Equal participation in society
21. ALTERNATIVES TO COMPULSION
Stop colluding with discriminatory community consensus
Recovery focus - crisis prevention focus & ‘the life I want’
Advance directives
More and better crisis options
Robust systemic and individual advocacy
‘Compulsory responsiveness orders’
Separate healing function from control function
22. AN END TO MENTAL HEALTH LAWS
Treatment and detention without consent rare and brief
Emergency interventions have the comparable threshold as physical medicine
Rethink assumptions about human responsibility for crimes
Humane recovery oriented criminal justice system
23. THE ROAD TO HELL...GOOD INTENTIONS
‘Of all the tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive...for those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience...’ CS Lewis