1 / 25

John F. Hermance, Brown University Robert W. Jacob, Brown University

"NDVI; The Movie". Dynamically Characterizing a Variety of Phenological Responses of Semi-Arid Areas to Hydrological Inputs using Multi-Year AVHRR NDVI Time Series. John F. Hermance, Brown University Robert W. Jacob, Brown University Bethany A. Bradley, Princeton University

bryson
Download Presentation

John F. Hermance, Brown University Robert W. Jacob, Brown University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. "NDVI; The Movie" Dynamically Characterizing a Variety of Phenological Responses of Semi-Arid Areas toHydrological Inputs using Multi-Year AVHRR NDVI Time Series John F. Hermance, Brown University Robert W. Jacob, Brown University Bethany A. Bradley, Princeton University John F. Mustard, Brown University e-mail: John_Hermance@Brown.Edu

  2. Location of the Study Area

  3. Note the trend for elevation to increase to SE. 150 x 150 km: West Central Nevada

  4. Topography of the Study Area.

  5. Compare elevation (250 m DEM) and vegetation (AVHRR NDVI). Elevation (200 m contour interval) NDVI (Q75 for 1995 - 2002) The NDVI parameter is the upper quartile of all 7 yrs data at each site. (Large red squares are subareas; small red polygons are farms.)

  6. Compare vegetation (AVHRR NDVI) w/ Homer's ('97) landcover classes. NDVI (Q75 for 1995 - 2002) Homer's (1997) Landcover Classes

  7. Bradley et als. (2006) landcover classes using this algorithm NDVI (Q75 for 1995 - 2002)

  8. An objective of this study is to more closely identify particular fluctuations in the spatial and temporal patterns of NDVI with other environmental variables. Here, we explore hydrologic inputs. Short-term, multi-year hydrologic indicators for the region: the mean monthly precipitation at 6 stations, and stream runoff in the Humboldt River.

  9. Landsat scene. Landsat: 1998_06-28. Thematic Mapper; Path 42 Row 32 (Post "Wet" Season)

  10. Landsat scene. Landsat: 2000_10-07. Thematic Mapper; Path 42 Row 32 (Post "Dry" Season)

  11. The Algorithm. (Reported previously at this meeting.) Location map for our study area in west central Nevada, along with the names of adjacent states. Also indicated is the boundary of the Great Basin. • The interannual spline algorithm uses: • Model roughness damping; • Upper data envelope tracking.

  12. Examples of data classes. Original NDVI time series from 3 classes of vegetation types. Panel A: Stable agriculture. Panel B: Montane shrubland. Panel C: Invasive grasses (cheatgrass). The vertical gray band at approx. 1999.4 yr (actually from the 1 week data composite centered at 1999.414) denotes an inferred data gap associated with what is observed as a ubiquitous anomalously high NDVI data value for this interval throughout our Basin and Range data base.

  13. Stages in "fitting" Cheatgrass data. Each step in the procedure applied to the Cheatgrass time series. Panel A; Step 1: The simple annual harmonic starting model. Panel B; Step 2: The roughness damped, average annual harmonic model weighted to track the upper data envelope. Panel C; Step 3: A preliminary 8-th order inter-annual spline model with weak upper-envelope weighting. Panel D; Step 4: A 14-th order inter-annual spine model with stronger upper-data envelope weighting.

  14. Average annual fit to 3 data classes. Average annual variation models for the three classes of vegetation types. All models were computed using the same control parameters (weighting coefficients, roughness damping, etc.).

  15. Inter-annual fit to 3 data classes. Inter-annual (spline) variation models for the three classes of vegetation types. All models were computed using the same control parameters (weighting coefficients, roughness damping, etc.).

  16. Fit to "gappy" data. Comparing the inter-annual spline model in this report (Panel A) with the average annual model (Panel B) of Hermance (2006) for the same time series from a single 1 x 1 km montane shrubland site. The substantial data gap (from 1994.72 to 1995.05) is due to sensor failure on board NOAA-11. Panel A: The inter-annual model uses 14th order annual splines. Panel B: The average annual model uses a 10th order non-classical harmonic series superposed on a 0th order polynomial (mean value). (Note the flags (a), (b) and (c) denote noteworthy tracking attributes.

  17. Topography of the Study Area. The NDVI animations will begin with the entire study area.

  18. NDVI: Entire Study Area(1995-2002 Interannual variations.) Note: Agricultural areas. Montane snow cover. Anomalous greenup in valleys. Run animation.

  19. NDVI from the Dixie Valley / Edwards Creek Valley Subarea.

  20. Note: Impulsive greenup of Cheatgrass in NE Edwrds Crk Valley in 1998. Behavior of montane snow cover. Concatenation of NDVI w agricultural areas. NDVI: Dixie and Edwards Creek Valleys(1995-2002 Interannual variations.) Run animation.

  21. NDVI from the Buena Vista Valley Subarea.

  22. Note: Impulsive greenup of Cheatgrass in SW sector of valley in 1998. Behavior of montane snow cover. Concatenation of NDVI w agricultural areas. NDVI: Buena Vista Valley(1995-2002 Interannual variations.) Run animation.

  23. NDVI from Desatoya Mountains Subarea.

  24. Note: Asymmetric spatial and temporal development of montane snow cover and greenup. NDVI: Desatoya Mountains(1995-2002 Interannual variations.) Run animation.

  25. Background This poster is one of several, related presentations made at this meeting. For more details on the application of this and other methods to classification and monitoring land cover change in the western U.S. (and relations to climate change) see Jacob, R., B. Bradley, J. Hermance and J. Mustard (2006) Phenology-based Land Cover Classification and Assessment of Land Cover Trends: A Case Study in the Western U.S., Eos Trans. AGU, 87(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract B33F-05 Bradley, B. A. (2006), Impacts of Climate Variability on Non-native Plant Invasion in the Western U.S., Eos Trans. AGU, 87(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract B41E-0230. The Landsat-based landcover classification is from Homer (1997). Citation Information:Collin G. Homer, Dept. of Geography and Earth Resources, Utah State University Logan, Utah 84322 Publication_Date: 1997 Title: Nevada Landcover Classification Online_Linkage: <http://earth.gis.usu.edu/> For reports on our latest work: Bradley, B. A., and Mustard, J. F., 2005, Identifying land cover variability distinct from land cover change: Cheatgrass in the Great Basin. Remote Sensing of Environment, 94, pp. 204-213. Bradley, B. A., R.W. Jacob, J.F. Hermance, and J.F. Mustard. 2006. A curve fitting procedure to derive inter-annual phenologies from time series of noisy satellite NDVI data. submitted to Remote Sensing of Environment, in press. Hermance, J. F., 2006, Stabilizing High-Order, Non-Classical Harmonic Analysis of NDVI Data for Average Annual Models by Damping Model Roughness, submitted to International Journal of Remote Sensing, in press. Hermance, J. F., R. W. Jacob, B. A. Bradley and J. F. Mustard, 2006, Extracting Phenological Signals from Multi-Year AVHRR NDVI Time Series: Framework for Applying High-Order Annual Splines with Roughness Damping. Submitted to IEEE Transactions of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, June, 2006. For copies of reports on the algorithm:http://www.geo.brown.edu/research/Hydrology/NDVI_reports/

More Related