230 likes | 404 Views
Case Study 8. New Product Development (NPD) Tony Gauvin, 1006. Company 8. Financial Services firm Consumer retail banking 200 banks in 20 States 30% market share Goal – New (High-tech) Product Development Improve image as a technologically advanced in institution
E N D
Case Study 8 New Product Development (NPD) Tony Gauvin, 1006
Company 8 • Financial Services firm • Consumer retail banking • 200 banks in 20 States • 30% market share • Goal – New (High-tech) Product Development • Improve image as a technologically advanced in institution • Online store providing consulting for customers that wanted to start their own businesses • Theme • “Marketing is a process for creating and delivering goods, services, and ideas to customers “
Company Background • NPD into the online environment failed • Focused on e-commerce and CRM • Failed to thoroughly understand BI • syndicated research issues • Concern over technology-image decline • Entrepreneurial customer base • product to start own business • bank would leverage intra and extranet technologies
Overview • Marketing department reports gradually declining customers satisfaction compare to major competitors • Company’s technology image • Overall customer satisfaction • Willingness to recommend • Award winning intranet and extranet technology • Goal- increase in key indicators in relation to competitors
Goal and strategies • Create a new, high-tech retail banking product • Process >> new product development • Data • Syndicated research study • Employee interviews • Marketing, IS and Advertising company • Idea generation • Idea screening • Result • Electronics store infrastructure • Market-driven (need) • Technology driven (been there –done that)
New Product Development (NPD) • Six types of new products (review) • New-to-the-world products • New product lines • Additions to existing product lines • Improvements and revisions of existing products • Repositioning(s) or restaging(s) • Cost reductions
Idea generation Idea screening Concept development and testing Market strategy development Business analysis Product development Market testing Commercialization Managing the New Product Process
New Product Failure Rate 98-99% 80% Depending on the study
NPD Method • Organizational improvisation (Moorman 2001) • Simultaneous planning and implementation • Requires • High levels of internal knowledge • Real time communications among product team members • Outside-looking-in information source
NPD method • Technology Map (Capou and Glazer, 1987) • Conduct technology resources inventory • Address resource gaps • Determine “what to sell” • Evaluation of new Product
The product • Online Stores • Maintained and handled by Company 8 • $1000/month • Promotions • Free hosting for 90 days • $150 savings • In branch merchandising • Direct sales • Result – Sales far below expectations • Regroup (focus groups) and reintroduce • Results 75 stores in 2 years (expected 300) • Withdrew product
General Reasons for New Product Failure • CEO ego • Market size overestimated • Poor design • Incorrect positioning • Incorrect advertising • Overpriced • High development costs • Competitor reaction
Why Did It Fail? • Further into NPD before simultaneously implement? • Step 3 in the organizational improvisational plan • outside looking in information source • Issues • range of technological sophistication and product support services • out-of-core competency • Surprise • Key indicators all improved
Stakeholders • Customers • Serving current • Shareholders • Negative impact
E-Biz Components • eCommerce • Online store front • Business Intelligence • Surveys (Advertising & employees) • Did not survey customer till after deployment • Customer Relationship Management • Goal of the project • Supply Chain Management N/A • Enterprise Resource Planning N/A
Value Bubble Analysis • Not initially included in promotion and communications • Assumed that off-line and on-lien customers behaved the same • Technology savvy customers ignored the traditional marketing since it was ALL place-bound in the physical banks • Used ATMS and online banking • Value Bubble analysis is based on what should have been done
Attract • Did not do much • Should have • Off-line and online traffic building • Press releases • SEO • Reciprocal links • Technologies • Site design • ASP • CSS • JavaScript • JSP
Engage • Did implement • Password for eSupport • Community section • Helpful hints • Technologies • Java calculators • HTML forms • Did not use DOM
Retain • Intended to provide • Updates and enhancements • Send e-mails • Redo “helpful hints” • Technologies • Account and password “caching” • Should have • Cookies (greetings) • Database
Learn • Good implementation • Pop-up surveys for customer satisfaction • Customer registration • Profiling • Technology • ASP • JSP • Database • Clicksteam??
Relating • Customizable navigation based on usage • 36 hour turn around on tech support • Technologies • ASP • PHP • CSS • JavaScript
Success or Failure • FAILURE with this product • SUCCESS with the objectives • Problems • Bad BI • Not customer concentric • Product did not match customer wants and expectations • Moved away from core-competency • Organizational improvisation for small “fleet-of-foot” technology companies not BANKS • Future success likely if they have “learned their lesson”
Summary • Good example of a dot.com failure • More learning is available by analyzing failure than success • Questions??