1 / 11

Understanding District Corrective Action: Guidelines and Accountability Measures

This document outlines the criteria and steps involved in district corrective action, including accountability measures for student performance, requirements for annual measurable objectives, and participation rates. It emphasizes the importance of meeting AYP and the implications for schools within the district.

burkett
Download Presentation

Understanding District Corrective Action: Guidelines and Accountability Measures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Understanding District Corrective Action Michael A. Ford Federal Programs Director December 8, 2010

  2. Old Terms Current Terms • formally KY Tier1 status • formally KY Tier 2 status • formally KY Tier 3 status • District Improvement Year 1 • District Improvement Year 2 • District Corrective Action Year 1 • District Corrective Action Year 2*(Russell Co. is in Corrective Action, Year 2 and not to be confused w/ the district’s special ed. corrective action plan) *or more depending upon years of not making AYP

  3. Must meet AYP for two consecutive years to come out of “district improvement” or “corrective action”

  4. Sufficient Size • For Annual Measurable Objectives: (Accountable Students) • 1. at least 10 students in the subpopulation in each grade where NCLB assessments are administered, AND • 2. at least 60 students in the subpopulation in these combined grades OR the • number of students in the subpopulation is at least 15% of all students in these combined grades. • For Participation: (Tested Students) • 1. at lease 10 students in the subpopulation in each grade where NCLB assessments are administered, AND • 2. at least 60 students in the subpopulation in these combined grades.

  5. But…our schools are high performing-YES, they are! Majority of schools didn’t have sufficient number of students w/ disabilities and/or 504 plans to meet the participation rate

  6. OVERVIEW OF TITLE I DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT STATUS

  7. OVERVIEW OF TITLE I DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT STATUS

  8. Accountability • Each of us are accountable to/responsible for all students • Will take each and every one of us to come out of corrective action • Higher performance for students at the school level (including those w/ disabilities) = improved performance for the district • Regardless as to whether or not a particular subgroup meets the participation rate at your school, that subgroup will count at the district level

  9. Questions, Comments or Suggestions? Please e-mail me

More Related