1 / 6

Teaching Employment Law Through Problems

Teaching Employment Law Through Problems. Rachel Arnow-Richman University of Denver, Sturm College of Law February 15, 2013. A Tale of Two Syllabi. Problem-Based . Traditional Structure. Employment At-Will and Contractual Modification of the Default Rule

burton
Download Presentation

Teaching Employment Law Through Problems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Teaching Employment Law Through Problems Rachel Arnow-Richman University of Denver, Sturm College of Law February 15, 2013

  2. A Tale of Two Syllabi Problem-Based Traditional Structure Employment At-Will and Contractual Modification of the Default Rule Job offers and assurances of continued employmentpp. 77-102Goff-Hamel v. Obstetricians & GynecologistsShebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.Pugh v. See’s Candies, IncProblem 2.2 Personnel policies and handbookspp. 102-22Woolley v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.Conner v. City of Forest AcresDemasse v. ITT CorporationProblem 2.4 Job security in written employment contractspp. 139-58-66Benson v. JFR, Inc.UBMC v. HardyProblems 3.1 & 3..3 Employment At-Will and Contractual Modification of the Default Rule Problem 2-2:Joboffers and expectations of continued employmentpp. 74-81, 86-96Goff-Hamel v. Obstetricians & GynecologistsShebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.Pugh v. See’s Candies, Inc Problem 2-4: Personnel policies and handbookspp. 96-106, 107-23Guz v. BechtelConner v. City of Forest AcresDemasse v. ITT Corporation Problems 3-1 and 3-3: Job security in written employment contractspp. 125-26, 141-64, 164-78Benson v. JFR, Inc.UBMC v. Hardy

  3. Statutory Compliance Assignment 14: Accommodating Employees’ Health & Family Responsibilities Suppose that the facts recounted in Troupe v. May Dept. Stores were to occur the effective date of the Family Medical Leave Act. How would this affect Troupe’s situation and her employer’s obligations? If you were counsel to May Department Stores, how would you recommend it respond to Troupe’s tardiness and pregnancy-related illness? To her need for leave? What obligations does Troupe have to your client prior to, during, and after any leave it provides her?

  4. Responding to Adverse Law Assignment 4: Personnel policies and handbooks Imagine that following Woolley, the Human Resources director at Hoffmann-La Roche contacts you about revising the company’s personnel manual. The HR director feels that the manual is good for employee morale and would like to continue using it, but hopes to alter the language so as to protect the company from future contractual liability. Look at footnote 2 of Woolley, which contains the key language that gave rise to Woolley’s claim. How would you redraft this? What might you add? Will the revision you create satisfy the company’s goals?

  5. Negotiating Terms of Hire & Separation • Assignment 5: Job Security in Written Employment Contracts • Assess whether Blackwell has any claim against the company under each of the following scenarios: • Blackwell's contract provides: "This agreement shall run for two years from the date of hire unless terminated earlier on the basis of just cause. Just cause means gross misconduct, dishonesty, commission of a crime, or other conduct that seriously jeopardizes the company.“ • Blackwell's contract provides: "This agreement shall run for two years from the date of hire. In the event that the company terminates Blackwell prior to that date, Blackwell shall receive her full salary for the remainder of the contract term.“ • Blackwell's contract provides: "This agreement can only be terminated on the basis of just cause and upon one month's notice.“

  6. And the verdict . . . ? “The class was focused more on completing problems than actually learning the law… If you don't like learning through hypos, don't take this course.”  “I would have liked to talk a little more about the cases we read. We mostly used the hypotheticals …While that was helpful, I think a little more focus on the cases before getting into the problems might have been beneficial.” We never went over the case law that we read, and students were responsible for laying out all the … rules through application to the hypo. Many times this got very convoluted, …. If LEARNING through hypos is helpful to you, this class will be very enjoyable. However, I need to have a firm understand of the law BEFORE hypos are any help to me at all.   “[S]he teaches this class by the problem method. This is a fun and different way to conduct a class. It is a very refreshing departure from the normal monotony of school.”R co “I liked the problem-solving focus as opposed to case briefing. Definitely keep that.”  “AR conducts her classes like a business school class based on working through problems during class. I’ve learned so much in this class because of this approach. She’s also awesome.” Problem-Based Traditional Structure

More Related