1 / 30

CFL learners’ perception of temporally modified speech

CFL learners’ perception of temporally modified speech. Jun Da ( 笪骏 ) Middle Tennessee State University Jun.Da@mtsu.edu Denver, 11/19/2011. 1. Speech rates in CFL learning and instruction.

butch
Download Presentation

CFL learners’ perception of temporally modified speech

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CFL learners’ perception of temporally modified speech Jun Da (笪骏) Middle Tennessee State University Jun.Da@mtsu.edu Denver, 11/19/2011

  2. 1. Speech rates in CFL learning and instruction • Speech rate has been one of the many factors that are often controlled by native speakers and instructors to assist learners’ listening comprehension. • In the real world • Average normal speech rate for Chinese native speakers • Meng (2005): 244.45 characters/min • Foreigner talk/teacher talk • In CFL instruction • Speech rates of selected CFL textbooks (Da 2009) • Chinese Link (1st edition) • Integrated Chinese (2nd edition) • Prescribed speech rates for CFL learners: HSK • Basic level: 120-170 characters/min • Elementary-intermediate: 170-220 c/m for • Observation • There are disparities between normal speech rates and those used in CFL learning and instruction.

  3. Normal speech rates (Meng 2005)

  4. Speech rates of Chinese Link and Integrated Chinese

  5. 2. Learner needs and solutions (I) • Pedagogy • Authentic materials are preferred for communicative language learning and instruction. • Learner needs • Many beginning and (sometimes) even intermediate level learners (intuitively) feel that slow speech rate would help their listening comprehension. • A practical problem • While multimedia authentic materials are readily available, it is often impossible to find materials that are slow enough for those needy CFL learners.

  6. 2. Learner needs and solutions (II) • Possible solutions: • Instructors/native speakers produce slow rate audio materials for CFL learners. • Examples: CFL textbooks such as Integrated Chinese (Yao, et al 2005), and Chinese Link (Wu, et al 2006), etc.; • Problem: It takes time, effort and experience to produce slow rate audio learning materials. • Instructors and CFL learners can use software to vary the playback rate of audio recordings (Da 2011). • Benefits: Everybody can do it; saves instructor’s time; • Software applications: • Windows Media Player: Available on PC • QuickTime player: Available on Mac and PC • VLC Player: Cross platform (http://www.videolan.org/vlc/) • Audacity: Cross platform (http://audacity.sourceforge.net/)

  7. 3. Research questions (I) • Previous research findings about the effects of varying speech rate on listening comprehension • Empirical research has produced mixed results (Rost 2005, Zhao 1997): • Griffiths (1990): Slower speech rate will improve ESL (English as a Second Language) learners’ listening comprehension when aided with other simplifications in syntax and rhetorical structure. • Blau (1990): Simply reducing speech rate from faster to slower did not improve the listening comprehension of intermediate and advanced level EFL learners. • Zhao’s (1997) with ESL learners: “(a) when given control, students’ listening comprehension improved, and (b) improved comprehension control was achieved by slowing down the speech rate.” • Research on CFL learners: Not available

  8. 3. Research questions (II) • Questions for this research • Do software modified audio recordings sound unnatural? • Yes and no, depending on the rate change. • How do CFL learners perceive software modified audio recordings? • Can CFL learners detect any speech rate change, e.g., do the modified materials sound slow to them? • Does speech rate change help improving CFL learners’ listening comprehension?

  9. 4. This experiment • Objectives and research design • Data collection • Results • Discussions

  10. 4.1 Objectives and research design • Objectives • To find out and compare CFL learners’ perception of the speech rates of both unmodified and software modified audio recordings; • To determine if there is any improved listening comprehension when the same audio clip is slowed down by software. • Research design • CFL learners listen to 7 unmodified and modified audio recordings of various speech rates and report their judgment of speech rates and comprehension.

  11. 4.2 Data collection (I) • Subjects • 28 students at Middle Tennessee State University • 26 true beginners with 2 months of Chinese learning, 3 classroom hours per week; • 2 native/heritage speakers (excluded in statistical analysis) • 20 students at Beijing Normal University • Proficiency • Advanced level (Self reported): 14 • Intermediate level (Self reported): 6 • Native languages • Korean, Vietnamese, Indonesian, Portuguese, Thai, English.

  12. 4.2 Data collection (II) • Stimuli: • Seven audio clips • Chinese Link: • Unmodified CL Normal: cln.mp3 • Unmodified CL Slow: cls.mp3 • Modified CL Normal (-25%): cln25.mp3 • Modified CL Normal (-40%): cln40.mp3 • 中央人民广播电台《新闻和报纸摘要》(http://aod.cnr.cn) • Unmodified normal speed: xy1.mp3 • Modified normal (-25%): xy25.mp3 • Modified normal (-40%): xy40.mp3 • Average speech rates • Acoustic differences

  13. Average speech rates of the 7 audio clips

  14. Average speech rates of the 7 audio clips

  15. Acoustic differences between natural and software modified audio clips • Contrast between human produced speech and software modified speech • Modified: Only tempo • Naturally slow: Tempo, pitch and intensity (volume)

  16. 4.2 Data collection (III) • The Questionnaire • CFL learners’ perception of the speech rate of those seven clips; • CFL learners’ self-reported comprehension of 3 sample clips • CL normal speed • News report at normal speed • News report at -40% speed • Sample question

  17. Sample question

  18. 4.3 Results (I) • CFL learners’ perceived speech rates of the 7 audio clips • All subjects • By groups: Novice vs. Intermediate and Advanced • CFL learners’ self reported comprehension of 3 audio clips • CL normal, News normal and News at -40% • Analysis: • All subjects • By groups: Novice vs. Intermediate and Advanced

  19. 4.3 Results (II) All subjects: CFL learners’ perceived speech rates

  20. All subjects: CFL learners’ perceived speech rates • A one-way ANOVA was used to test for perceived rate differences among three audio clips of the news clip: Normal, Normal at -25% and Normal at -40%. Perceived speech rates of the three audio clips differed significantly across the three rates, F (2, 134) = 51.7, p < .001.

  21. 4.3 Results (III) By groups: CFL learners’ perceived speech rates

  22. By groups: CFL learners’ perceived speech rates

  23. 4.3 Results (III) All subjects: CFL learners’ self reported comprehension of 3 audio clips t-test for News Normal vs. Modified News Normal at -40% : p<0.01

  24. 4.3 Results (III)

  25. 4.3 Results (IV) By groups: CFL learners’ self reported comprehension of 3 audio clips Novice group: t-test for News at normal vs. News at -40%: not significant Advanced group: t-test for News at normal vs. News at -40%: p<0.004

  26. By groups: CFL learners’ self reported comprehension of 3 audio clips

  27. 4.4 Discussions • CFL learners, both beginning and advanced level learners do detect speech rate change. Such detection of different speech rates is statistically significant when normal speech rate is reduced by 25% or 40%; • When normal speech rate is reduced by 40%, significantly improved comprehension is self reported by learners at the intermediate to advanced level by not the novice group. This matches with Zhao’s (1997) findings with intermediate and advanced level ESL learners. • Findings from this experiment suggest that we can confidently make use of software applications to provide students with learning materials at various speed rates, and thus enabling them to engage in more learning practices.

  28. 5. Concluding remarks • Some issues with current research project • Research design: More stimulus clips • Setting: Homogeneous experiment environment • Questions: Need to ask questions on the naturalness of software modified speeches

  29. References • Blau, Eileen, 1990. “The effect of syntax, speed and pauses on listening comprehension.” TESOL Quarterly, 24, 4,746-752. • Da, Jun. 2009. Speech rate and CFL instructional audio materials preparation. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Chinese Language Pedagogy. Guilin, China. • Da, Jun. 2011. How to adjust the playback speed of audio and video learning materials. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching and Research in the U.S., 2011,93-97. • Griffiths, Roger, 1990. “Speech Rate and NNS Comprehension: A Preliminary Study in Time-Benefit Analysis.” Language Learning. 40,3,311-336. • Rost, M., 2005. “L2 listening.” In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, edited by HinkKel, E., 503-527. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. • Wu, Sue-mei Wu, Yueming Yu, Yanhui Zhang, and WeizhongTian, 2006. Chinese Link (《中文天地》). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. • Yao, Tao-chung, Yuehua Liu, LiangyanGe, Yea-fen Chen, Nyan-Ping Bi, Xiaojun Wang, and Yaohua Shi. 2005. Integrated Chinese (2nd Ed.) (《中文听说读写》). Boston: Cheng & Tsui Company. • Zhao, Yong, 1997. “The effects of listeners’ control of speech rate on second language comprehension.” Applied Linguistics, 18,1,49-68. • 孟国. 2005. 对外汉语听力教学中语速问题的调查和思考.《第八届国际汉语教学讨论会论文选》. 北京

More Related