1 / 29

MANAGEMENT 455

MANAGEMENT 455. GOOD STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION CHAPTER 10. Crafting vs. Executing Strategy. Crafting the Strategy Primarily a market-driven activity Successful strategy making depends on Business vision Perceptive analysis of market conditions and company capabilities

byron
Download Presentation

MANAGEMENT 455

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MANAGEMENT 455 GOOD STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION CHAPTER 10

  2. Crafting vs. Executing Strategy • Crafting the Strategy • Primarily a market-drivenactivity • Successful strategy making depends on • Business vision • Perceptive analysis of market conditions and company capabilities • Attracting and pleasing customers • Outcompeting rivals • Using company capabilities to forge a competitive advantage • Executing the Strategy • Primarily an operations-drivenactivity • Successful strategy execution depends on • Doing a good job of working through others • Good organization-building • Building competitive capabilities • Creating a strategy-supportive culture • Getting things done and delivering good results 10-2

  3. Implementation involves . . . Executing the Strategy • An action-oriented, make-things happen task involving management’s ability to • Direct organizational change • Achieve continuous improvement in operations and business processes • Move toward operatingexcellence • Create and nurture astrategy-supportive culture • Consistently meet or beat performance targets • Tougher and more time-consuming than crafting strategy

  4. Implementing a New StrategyRequires Adept Leadership • Implementing a new strategytakes adept leadership to • Convincingly communicatereasons for the new strategy • Overcome pockets of doubt • Secure commitment of concerned parties • Build consensus and enthusiasm • Get all implementation pieces in place and coordinated

  5. Why Executing Strategy Isa Tough Management Job • Overcoming resistance to change • Wide array of demanding managerialactivities to be performed • Numerous ways to tackle each activity • Number of bedeviling issues to be worked out • Demands good people management skills • Requires launching and managinga variety of initiatives simultaneously • Hard to integrate efforts of many different work groups into a smoothly-functioning whole

  6. Who Are the Strategy Implementers? • Implementing and executing strategy involves a company’s wholemanagement team and all employees • Just as every part of a watch plays a role in making the watch function properly, it takesall pieces of an organization working cohesively for a strategy to be well-executed • Top-level managers must leadtheprocess and orchestrate major initiatives • But they must rely on cooperation of • Middle and lower-level managers to see things go well in various parts of an organization and • Employees to perform their roles competently

  7. Characteristics of the Strategy Implementation Process • Every manager has an active role • No proven “formula” for implementing particular types of strategies • There are guidelines, but no absolute rules and “must do it this way” rules • Many ways to proceed that are capable of working • Cuts across many aspects of “how to manage”

  8. Characteristics of the Strategy Implementation Process (continued) • Each implementation situation occurs in a different context, affected by differing • Business practices and competitive situations • Work environments and cultures • Policies • Compensation incentives • Mix of personalities and firm histories • Approach to implementation/execution has be customized to fit the situation • People implement strategies - Not companies!

  9. Figure 10.1: The Eight Components of Strategy Execution 10-9

  10. What Top Executives Have to Do inLeading the Implementation Process • Communicate the case for change • Build consensus on how to proceed • Arouse enthusiasm for the strategyto turn implementation process intoa companywide crusade • Empower subordinates to keep process moving • Establish measures of progress and deadlines • Reward those who achieve implementation milestones • Direct resources to the right places • Personally lead strategic change processand the drive for operating excellence

  11. BUILDING A CAPABLE ORGANIZATION — WHAT IS INVOLVED? 10-11

  12. Figure 10.2: The Three Components of Building anOrganization Capable of Proficient Strategy Execution 10-12

  13. Selecting the Management Team:Key Considerations • Determine mix of • Backgrounds • Experiences and know-how • Beliefs and values • Styles of managing and personalities • Personal chemistry must be right • Talent base needs to be appropriate • Picking a solid management team needs to be acted on early in implementation process

  14. Recruiting and Retaining Talented Employees: Implementation Issues • The quality of a company’speople is an essential ingredientof successful strategy execution • Biggest challenge facing companies • How to recruit and retain the bestand brightest talent with strongskill sets and management potential • Intellectual capital, not tangible assets, is increasingly being viewed as the most important investment • Talented people are a prime source of competitive advantage

  15. Three-Stage Process of Developing Competencies and Capabilities 1. First develop ability to do something 2. Build experience and gradually transform the ability into a core competence andproven capability 3. Continue to refine and polish the competence/capability, striving to perform the activity better than rivals, thereby turning the core competence into a distinctive competence and providing a path to competitive advantage!

  16. Step 1 in Developing Competencies • Develop ability to do something consistently well and at acceptable cost • Select people with relevant skills/experience • Broaden or expandindividual abilities as needed • Mold efforts and work products ofindividuals into a cooperative effortto create organizational ability

  17. Step 2 in Developing Competencies • As experience builds and company learns how to perform the activity consistently well and at acceptable cost, transform the ability into a core competenceand capability • Typically, a core competence or competitive capability emerges from establishing and nurturing collaborative relationships • Between individuals and groups in different departments • Between a company and its strategic allies

  18. Step 3 in Developing Competencies • If and when a company masters the activity, not just performing it really well but performingitbetter than rivals, the “core competence” (and now “proven capability”) becomes a • Distinctive competence and • Holds potential forcompetitive advantage This is the optimal outcome of the process of building competitively potent competencies and capabilities!

  19. Approaches to Developing Competencies • Internal development involves either • Strengthening the company’s base of skills, knowledge, and intellect or • Coordinating and networking the effortsof various work groups and departments • Partnering with key suppliers,forming strategic alliances,or maybe even outsourcingcertain activities to specialists • Buying a company that has the required capabilities and integrating these competencies into the firm’s value chain

  20. Updating Competencies andCapabilities as Conditions Change • Competencies and capabilities mustcontinuously be modified and perhapseven replaced with new ones due to • New strategic requirements • Evolving market conditions • Changing customer expectations • Ongoing efforts to keep core competencies up-to-date can provide a basis for sustainingboth • Effective strategy execution and • Competitive advantage

  21. CEO Vice President Vice President Vice President Execution-Related Aspectsof Organizing Work Efforts • Few hard and fast rules for organizing • One Big Rule:Role and purpose of organization structure is to support and facilitate good strategy execution! • Each firm’s structure is idiosyncratic, reflecting • Prior arrangements and internal politics • Executive judgments and preferences about how to arrange reporting relationships • How best to integrate and coordinate work effort of different work groups and departments

  22. Figure 10.3: Structuring the Work Effort toPromote Successful Strategy Execution 10-22

  23. What Types of OrganizationalStructures Fit Which Strategies? • A company operating in one business • Functional department structure • A company with operations in various parts of the world • Geographic organizational units • A vertically integrated company • Divisional organizational structure • A diversifiedcompany • Individual business units, with each business unit operating as independent profit center

  24. Step 3: Determine How MuchAuthority to Delegate to Whom • In a centralized structure • Top managers retain authorityfor most decisions • In a decentralized structure • Managers and employees areempowered to make decisions • Trend in most companies • Shift from authoritarian to decentralizedstructures stressing empowerment

  25. Step 4: Provide for InternalCross-Unit Coordination • Classic method of coordinating activities – Have related units report to single manager • Upper-level managers have cloutto coordinate efforts of their units • Support activities should bewoven into structure to • Maximize performance of primary activities • Contain costs of support activities • Formal reporting relationships often need to be supplemented to facilitate coordination

  26. Current Organizational Trends • Numerous companies have completedthe task of remodeling traditional, hierarchical structures built on • Functional specialization and • Centralized authority • Corporate downsizing movement in thelate 1980s and early 1990s was aimed at • Recasting authoritarian, pyramidalorganizational structures • Into flatter, decentralized structures

  27. Drawbacks of CentralizedAuthoritarian Structures • Centralized or authoritarian structures have often turned out to be a liability where • Customer preferences shift fromstandardized to customized products • Product life-cycles grow shorter • Flexible manufacturing replaces mass production • Customers want to be treated as individuals • Pace of technological change accelerates • Market conditions are fluid

  28. Organizational Structures ofthe Future: Overall Themes • Revolutionary changes in how work is organized have been triggered by • New strategic priorities • Rapidly shifting competitive conditions • Tools of organizational design include • Empowered managers and workers • Reengineered work processes • Self-directed work teams • Rapid incorporation of Internettechnology • Networking with outsiders

  29. Change & Learning Characteristics ofOrganizations of the Future • Extensive use of Internet technologyand e-commerce business practices • Fewer barriers between • Different vertical ranks • Functions and disciplines • Units in different geographic locations • Company and its suppliers, distributors,strategic allies, and customers • Capacityforchange and rapid learning • Collaborative efforts among people in different functions and geographic locations • Assembling work teams including more members dispersed over a wider geographic area

More Related