1 / 18

SUCCESS AND LAWYERS’ FEE S IN TURKEY

Av Cumhur Kemal Turam Member, Bar of Istanbul. SUCCESS AND LAWYERS’ FEE S IN TURKEY. The Istanbul Bar Association:. Founded in 1878 by 62 members. Largest Bar Association in Turkey 1/3rd of the current members are women. Pressure of increasing numbers.

caden
Download Presentation

SUCCESS AND LAWYERS’ FEE S IN TURKEY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Av Cumhur Kemal Turam Member, Bar of Istanbul SUCCESS AND LAWYERS’ FEES IN TURKEY

  2. The Istanbul Bar Association: • Founded in 1878 by 62 members. • Largest Bar Association in Turkey • 1/3rd of the current members are women

  3. Pressure of increasing numbers • More than 20,000 active lawyers in Istanbul • 2,200 new lawyers being admitted each year • 1/10th of the new comers in number retire each year • Anyone finishing the Law School and completing the apprentice period becomes a lawyer • By next year a Bar Entry exam will be introduced as a barrier • The large number of lawyers is expected to distort fee issues due to increasing competition

  4. Regulations about the Lawyers’ fee • Statutory Regulations – The Law • Rules of the Profession – Code of Ethic

  5. The Law - Art. 164 • ... “Upto 25% of the value of the claim or the value awarded by the judgement can be designated as the fee. • Agreements made according to the above paragraph may not have clauses to the effect that the claimed value or rights, with the exception of money, pass on to the lawyer in full or in part as payment of fees. • A fee below the minimum tariff cannot be agreed upon. The lawyer must notify the Boards of the Bar if he/she accepts a pro-bono case. In cases which no agreement on fees has been made, the fee will be decided according to the minimum fee tariff if the case is not a quantitive case in monetary terms. If the value of the case can be established in monetary terms, then the authority empowered to resolve fee disputes will decide on a fee based on the success of the lawyer and the work put in by the lawyer, that will be between 5% and 15% of the value of the case.” ...

  6. Art 164 • A success fee can be agreed upon by making the fee a percentage of the value to be awarded by the judgement. • In circumstancesin which there is a case which has a monetary value and no fee has been agreed upon, it will be up to the judge to decide what the fee will be, based on the work and success of the lawyer.

  7. The limitations • The success fee cannot be more than 25% of the value of the claim or the final judgement. • The claim itself cannot pass on to the attorney in whole or in part as payment of the legal fees. • The fee cannot be below the fee stated in the minimum tariff.

  8. Minimum fee tariff • Detailed tariff • Mostly sliding scale • Mostly percentage of claim • Not success related • To serve as a benchmark: fee for a Euro 100,000.- litigation would be Euro 11,280.-

  9. The Fee can vary based on success, provided that:- • The fee does not end up being below the minimum fee tariff • The fee earned due to the result does not end up exceeding 25% of the result • The share of the result is paid in money and not in kind.

  10. Art. 163 • No claim can be made in relation to a fee agreement once the terms of the agreement have been fulfilled and the agreement has been executed. • If any part of the fee agreement is in breach of the law, only that part will be void and the rest of the agreement will survive

  11. Main factors having an effect on the practice of fee agreements • Competitive environment • The culture: result-oriented expectations of the lawyer • Result: Minimum fee tariff is not always respected and is also made subject to success

  12. Consequences • In general the client is accepted as the source of the problem: exploiting the competitive environment • Executed contracts can not be scrutinised

  13. Bars Union Letter to Banks /1 • November 2005 • Accurate in noting that contracts below the minimum tariff are harming the legal profession and are against the law • Sees competitive environment as being the reason • Notes that no dispute between the contractual parties exists

  14. Bars Union Letter to Banks /2 • Explicitly concludes that the problem can not be solved by penalising lawyers • Sets out various suggestions on how the existing agreements can be materially amended so that they do not conflict with the regulations

  15. Consequences for Lawyers • Economic consequences only • If there is no success there is no problem • If there is success then the client may make use of the argument that “ the fee agreement does not comply with the law” for not paying the lawyer. • The lawyer will lose the fees if the client takes the matter to court

  16. The Advantages • The lawyers will be more result- oriented • Lawyers will tend to be part of the solution as opposed to be being part of the problem • Vertical mobility: new lawyers will always find an opening to enter the market and to get business and the better ones will build a career faster.

  17. The Disadvantages /1 • The lawyer may get too involved and lose his/her objectivity • The quality of the legal profession can be affected by inadequate fees. The high level of competition means that there are always a significant number of lawyers who don’t get enough work and are motivated to go for even lower fees.

  18. The Disadvantages /2 • Efficiency of the judicial system may be jeopardised • Winning or losing can become more important than the letter of the law • Not losing by delaying or even preventing the Court from reaching a decision may be considered as being the success of the defending counsel.

More Related