1 / 1

Multi-objective Robust Stochastic Planning and Scheduling of Healthcare Service Providers

Multi-objective Robust Stochastic Planning and Scheduling of Healthcare Service Providers. Diagnosis. Surgery. Follow up. Ave = 17 days. Ave = 22 days. Grant CMMI-0928936 Service Enterprise Systems. Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care: When has CC happened?.

cael
Download Presentation

Multi-objective Robust Stochastic Planning and Scheduling of Healthcare Service Providers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Multi-objective Robust Stochastic Planning and Scheduling of Healthcare Service Providers Diagnosis Surgery Follow up Ave = 17 days Ave = 22 days Grant CMMI-0928936 Service Enterprise Systems Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care:When has CC happened? Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care:Evidence of low CC Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care:Low CC reason #1: rotation length Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care:Low CC reason #2: clinic attendance Research objectives To ensure proper education and equitable training of medical residents. • Enhance continuity of care to foster relationships between residents and patients • Distribute surgical experience optimally to produce more skilled, more confident residents Residents doing diagnosis are different from the ones doing surgery When same resident has seen a patient for diagnosis, surgery, and follow-up. For how many of the 131 vascular surgery patients at a Chicago area hospital was CC achieved by any resident? Comp-CC The Chicago area hospital has replaced some one-month rotations with two-month rotations Post-CC success Pre-CC success Low clinic attendance means residents aren’t doing outpatient diagnoses 3 1 2 4 5 Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care:Low CC reasons #4 and #5 Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care:Possible remedies Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care:Simulating changed behavior/logistics Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care:A better way Service team-based (current): Residents work together as a team to maintain the service needs of the hospital and learn as they go Apprenticeship-based (proposed): Residents shadow their mentor surgeons in clinic, surgery, and other activities #4: When residents are assigned to an upcoming surgery, no one knows who did the diagnosis #5: When a patient returns to clinic for follow-up, the resident who assisted the surgery isn’t alerted Increase clinic attendance Take turns doing inpatient diagnoses Follow-up notification system Scheduling System software Big relative improvements… …But comprehensive CC is still too low 10 6 7 8 9 Obj 1: Enhancing continuity of care:Apprenticeships improve CC Obj 2: Distribute surgical experience:The problem Obj 2: Distribute surgical experience :Simple solution Obj 2: Distribute surgical experience:Optimal scheduling model Obj 2: Distribute surgical experience:Optimal experiences The scheduling system can make educated guesses to improve case distribution. Continuity of care Resident CC = Mentor CC x adjust for rotation duration All residents are equal, but some are more equal than others Surgical experience Non-surgical experience Expected benefit Double booking 11 12 13 14 15 PI: Sanjay Mehrotra, Co-PIs: Mark S. Daskin, Heron Rodriguez, Debra DaRosa; with: Jonathan Turner, Paul Speicher

More Related