1 / 14

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOUSING NORTH WEST

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOUSING NORTH WEST. PRESENTATION TO THE NCOP SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE 09 MAY 2006 HOD-M.I.MOTALA.

cai
Download Presentation

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOUSING NORTH WEST

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOUSINGNORTH WEST PRESENTATION TO THE NCOP SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE 09 MAY 2006 HOD-M.I.MOTALA

  2. STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATIONSTRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION 1. HOUSING BACKLOG2. EXPENDITURE3. DELIVERY STATISTICS4. PREVIOUS MTEF ALLOCATION5. CURRENT MTEF ALLOCATION6. DELIVERY STATISTICS7. REASONS FOR UNDEREXPENDITURE8. INTERVENTIONS9. STATUS OF PROJECTS10. MONITORING &OVERSIGHTfrom here to Proper Human settlements

  3. HOUSING BACKLOG (cont…) • Allocations for disasters (current ) : Taung 1900 Setlagole 1853 Mafikeng 500 • Projected 1500 p.a,

  4. EXPENDITURE 01/02 TO 05/06

  5. MTEF ALLOCATIONS

  6. DELIVERY STATISTICS

  7. DELIVERY STATS.(cont……) • The average delivery per year is 12 000 completed houses. • For the 2005/2006 target of 22 000, the department included a figure of 10 000 for the the two pilot projects.

  8. REASONS FOR UNDEREXPENDITURE 2004/2005 • lack of implementation capacity at Municipal level • departmental decision 2002 • management of consultants • hands off approach of department • lack of management information • non compliance with contractual conditions • blocked projects • forward planning • delays in processing claims(Province/Municipalities)

  9. INTERVENTIONS • Compliance with contractual requirements and suspensive conditions • Enforcement of MPRs • Monthly meetings with municipalities by provincial project teams • Creation of departmental project teams per district • Monthly meetings with Municipal managers and project managers on a district basis • Analysis of blocked projects • Commitment beyond MTEF allocation

  10. INTERVENTIONS(cont…..) • Project agreements cancelled with various municipalities: • Cancellation and transfer to performing turnkey developers • HMS developed to interface with HSS (Project Module) • Appointment of turnkey developers by department

  11. STATUS OF PROJECTS • Planning 35 • Under Construction 111 • Completed 62 • Blocked 30 • Total 258 (Total Contractual commitments: R 2,1 Billion over MTEF)

  12. Oversight / Monitoring and Evaluation • Monthly meetings with Municipal managers and project managers on a district basis • Creation of departmental project teams per district • Monthly meetings with municipalities by provincial project teams • Enforcement of Monthly Progress Reports (MPR)

  13. I THANK YOU

More Related