1 / 11

Systematic on Rear Leakage correction

Systematic on Rear Leakage correction. Observation : Different behaviour between Data & MC. Data. TB 2007 / TB 2010 C_leak = A(E) – Slope * F2 Slope : no dependance with E in first approximation. Erec / Ebeam. With Approximate option. F2. MC : 20 – 300 GeV. Example of fits.

cailin-burch
Download Presentation

Systematic on Rear Leakage correction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Systematic on Rear Leakage correction Observation : Different behaviour between Data & MC

  2. Data TB 2007 / TB 2010 C_leak = A(E) – Slope * F2 Slope : no dependance with E in first approximation

  3. Erec/Ebeam With Approximate option F2

  4. MC : 20 – 300 GeV Example of fits Erec/Etrue F2

  5. Comparison TB/MC Compatible with flat for MC Trend to drop with E with TB data Flat or increasing for MC E_TB / Etrue (GeV)

  6. TB2010 : A Fit with /without : Approximate option A currently calculated on event by event basis - Reflect the tendancy - Point at 300 GeV ? Current approximation of A(E) event per event

  7. ISS Data Approximate Etrue with the energy of the integrated profile. Black/Red : 4 month data Grey/Orange : profile H Green : current guess of A per event

  8. TB2010 : slope Etrue (GeV)

  9. Systematics on Cleak A : - 2% Difference observed at 300 GeV (TB) Slope : + 15 % Change of slope in MC >> 2% @ 300 GeV 5% @ 1 TeV

  10. MC : Fit of “0.025”

More Related