Mike Scharfenstein ES&H Coordinator

1. Environment, Safety and Health Mike Scharfenstein ES&H Coordinator

2. Integrated Safety and Environmental Management Process • DOE O 413.3A / Program and Project Management • Hazard Analysis Report • DOE O 420.2A / Accelerator Safety • Safety Assessment Document • Accelerator Safety Envelope • DOE O 450.1 / Safety Management System • Integrated Safety Management National Environmental Policy Act

3. ISEMS Process cont’d • The Environmental Assessment developed for the LCLS resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact encompassed the physical space occupied by LUSI and its operations • The LUSI Hazard Analysis Report states its instruments are being designed so that they will not pose hazards to people or the environment • The most significant potential hazard associated with LUSI instruments is that related to ionizing radiation • The LUSI instruments are designed to 10CFR 835 • defines radiation protection regulations for the protection of individuals from ionizing radiation • LUSI instruments will be designed and built w/i the scope of LCLS SAD • The instruments will comply with the approved Accelerator Safety Envelope

4. ISEMS Process cont’d • SLAC Integrated Safety and Environmental Management • SLAC ES&H Manual • Safety Oversight Committee Review Process • LCLS ES&H management practices • LCLS Requirement, Specification and Interface Documents • Physics Requirements Documents , Engineering Specification Documents , Preliminary & Final Design Reviews, etc • LCLS Work Authorization • Preliminary Design Review • SOC Reviews • Final Design Review • Project Management sign-off

5. Process to document the hazard assessment of the instrument design Reviewed and Approved by the DOE Stanford Site Office DOE O 413.3A / Program and Project Management Peer Review Hazards Analysis Report R. Hislop SME, Author & Reviewer APS F. O’Neil SME, Author of GLAST HAR Living document subject to an annual review Hazards Analysis Process

6. The hazard assessment process is a principal factor in the understanding and management of technical risk. Hazard severity is an assessment of the worst potential consequence, defined by degree of injury or property damage, which could occur Probability is the likelihood that an identified hazard will result in a mishap, based on an assessment of such factors as location, exposure in terms of cycles or hours of operation, and affected population. These levels are derived from MIL-STD-882D, Standard Practices for System Safety. Defense Standards are also used by other non-Defense government organizations, technical organizations, and industry Hazard Assessment Process

7. Hazard Consequence Rating

8. Hazards Analysis Radiation Fire Protection Electrical Seismic Chemical Thermal/Cryogenic Mechanical Aerosolized Nanoparticles Environmental Insults Air Emissions Waste Material Disposal Magnetic Oxygen Deficiency Vacuum / Pressure Laser Design Hazards Pinch points Sharp corners LUSI XCS Configuration X-Ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument Large Angle Detector Mover Diffractometer Split & Delay Hutch 4 Alcove XRT Post Monochromator Large Offset Monochromator

9. Conclusion • Integrated Safety and Environmental Management • Following SLAC ISEMS Process • SLAC ES&H Manual • Safety Oversight Committee • Following LCLS ES&H management practices • LCLS Requirement, Specification and Interface Documents • Work Authorization • Hazard Analysis Report • Approved by DOE