1 / 34

VABOR bijeenkomst 22 maart 2012 Nebest Adviesgroep Mijdrecht - Nederland

Lezing: Feasibility of externally bonded reinforcement for cathodic protection Philippe De Schoesitter Op uitnodiging van de Vereniging Adviseurs Beton Onderhoud en Reparatie (VABOR). VABOR bijeenkomst 22 maart 2012 Nebest Adviesgroep Mijdrecht - Nederland.

Download Presentation

VABOR bijeenkomst 22 maart 2012 Nebest Adviesgroep Mijdrecht - Nederland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lezing: Feasibility of externallybondedreinforcementfor cathodic protectionPhilippe De SchoesitterOp uitnodiging van de Vereniging Adviseurs Beton Onderhoud en Reparatie (VABOR) VABOR bijeenkomst 22 maart 2012 Nebest Adviesgroep Mijdrecht- Nederland

  2. Feasibility of externallybonded CFRP for cathodic protection Promotoren Prof. dr. ir. S. Matthys, Prof. dr. ir. G. De Schutter Begeleidster Ir. D. ErtzibengoaGaztelumendi Vakgroep Bouwkundige Constructies Voorzitter: prof. dr. ir. L. Taerwe Faculteit ingenieurswetenschappen en Architectuur Academiejaar 2010-2011 Hoofdstuk 1: Corrosie van wapeningsstaal in beton en kathodische bescherming Hoofdstuk 2: Uitwendig verlijmde carbonvezelwapening (CFRP) Hoofdstuk 3: Experiment en toetsing haalbaarheid VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  3. 1. Corrosie en kathodische bescherming (ICCP) 1.1 Corrosieproces en electrochemische achtergrond 1.2 Corrosiesnelheidsmeting 1.3 Kathodische bescherming: concrete toepassing VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  4. 1.2 Corrosieproces Fe2+ VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  5. VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  6. 1.2 Corrosiesnelheidsmeting Tafel-slopemeasurement Lineaire polarisatie VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  7. 1.3 Kathodische bescherming concreet • Mesh • Draad • Strip + coating (mortal, acryl…) Materials: • Metaal (Pt, Ti, Ag, Ni …) • Carbon (graphite …) VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  8. 2. “CFRP EBR” CFRP = Carbon FibreReinforcedPolymer EBR = ExternallybondedReinforcement 2.1 Wat, hoe en waarom? 2.2 Mogelijkheid tot combinatie met K.B. -> geleidbaarheid van carbon -> overlap toepassingsgebied 2.3 Probleem: geleidbaarheid lijmmiddel VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  9. 2.1 CFRP EBR VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  10. 2.1 CFRP EBR VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  11. 2.1 CFRP EBR VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  12. 2.2 Toepassing van CFRP als anode-materiaal • Interesse in combinatie vanuit verschillende perspectieven: • CFRP EBR heeft positieve invloed op corrosie (zgn. “passieve bescherming”) • Sterke geleidbaarheid van carbonvezels: eis van 1Ω.cm ruimschoots voldaan • De toepassingsgebieden van aanbreng externe wapening en • kathodische bescherming (of preventie) vertonen enige overlap. • I.h.b. wanneer grote betonoppervlakken onder trekspanning extra wapening vergen VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  13. 2.3 Geleidbaarheid epoxy-lijm Epoxy is insulative  conductiveadhesive  additives in epoxy: - Metal - Carbon particles: >‘Carbon black’ (powder) >graphite (fibres) >nanotubes VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  14. 2.3 Geleidbaarheid epoxy-lijm: Carbon Black - smallconductiveparticles - form a 3D-network as ‘electronpath’ + tunnel effect - chemicallyrather inert, temperatureresistant - “thresholdconcentration” - very high surfacearea (6 to 1500 m²/g) = problem! Coville NJ, Mhlanga SD, Nxumalo EN, Shaikjee A. A review of shaped carbon nanomaterials. S Afr J Sci. 2011;107(3/4), Art. #418, 15 pages. DOI: 10.4102/ sajs.v107i3/4.418 VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  15. 3. Experiment en toetsing haalbaarheid 3.1 Experiment set-up and program 3.2 Results and discussion 3.3 Conclusion VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  16. 3. Experiment en toetsing haalbaarheid 3.1 Experiment set-up and program 3.2 Results and discussion 3.3 Conclusion VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  17. 3.1 Experiment set-up and program Lollypop specimens: h=100mm, D≈50mm, reinforcement bar d=10mm Mortarcomposition:  C:SAND = 1:3  W/C = 0,65  Cl-/C = 4,25 wt% WET LAY-UP CFRP wraps: CP-ax-… : CFRP wrapsaxialfibredirections CP-rad-…: CFRP wrapsradialfibredirection CP-…: wrapsconsists of epoxy adhesiveonly VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  18. 3.1 Experiment set-up and program Primary anode: forconnec-tion to DC power supply and current spread over anode surface Axialfibredirection: optimalcurrent spread throughfibres (expected), “Ax-…” specimens Radialfibredirection: worsecurrent spread expected (bad conductivity of fibres in transversaldirection), “Rad-…” specimens VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  19. 3.1 Experiment set-up and program CP/immersion program Acceleratedcorrosioninitiation and process:  initial chloride content (4,25wt%)  cyclicimmersion in saline water (1wt%) CP program: phase 1: 14 days58,35mA/m² phase 2: 14 days26,53mA/m² VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  20. 3.1 Experiment set-up and program Conductive epoxies: VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  21. 3.1 Experiment set-up and program Serial circuit  equalprotectioncurrent! Separate baths nocurrent loss through water! VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  22. 3.1 Experiment set-up and program Reference specimens: “Ref”: cyclicimmersionbutunprotected (CP) Ref-1,2,3:no CFRP wrap Ref-FRP: classic resistantCFRP wrap Tafel: notimmersed, unprotected (CP) Tafel-ref: nowrap Tafel-50298: wrap VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  23. 3. Experiment en toetsing haalbaarheid 3.1 Experiment set-up and program 3.2 Results and discussion 3.3 Conclusion VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  24. 3.2 Results and discussion CP and Ref specimens  LinearPolarization (a) After 14 days CP/imm. (b) After 28 days CP/imm. CP switchedoff 48h in advance Ecorr±20mV and 0,15mV/s Tafel specimens  Potentiodynamicmeas. Tafel extrapolationforIcorr SlopemeasurementsforB Cell set-up VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  25. 3.2 Results and discussion VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  26. 3.2 Results and discussion VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  27. 3.2 Results and discussion VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  28. 3.2 Results and discussion VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  29. 3.2 Results and discussion On average and compared to Ref specimens: AX-specimens: 56% Rad-specimens: 53% CP-specimens: 64% 60L specimens: 53% 57C specimens: 71% 64C specimens: 51% 50298 specimens: 68% ECC specimens: 61% Epo specimens: 44% lowercorrosionrates VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  30. 3.2 Results and discussion Icorrevolution: VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  31. 3.2 Results and discussion Tafel slopemeasurements: B ≈ 26mV (depassivated steel) GoodcorrelationwithIcorrfromLP-measurements Mass loss measurements: CorrelationwithIcorrfromLP-measurements (withinexpected factor 2 error) VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  32. 3.2 Results and discussion • The steel potentials are not found in the safe passive zone • -> influence added chloride • Iprotdecrease (from 0,11 to 0,05mA) results in potential increase • -> except: fibreless specimens • Active chloride corrosion initiation was not prevented, but ICCP was effective. • > influence added chloride • The radial fibre orientation gives the most consistent results. • >This overall improvement may be due to better concrete confinement • -Anode resistivity: the most conductive epoxies show low change in Icorr evolution between both measurements. • ->fibresplaynorole in combinationwithveryconductive epoxies • -The CB added epoxies show the worst results. VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  33. 3. Experiment en toetsing haalbaarheid 3.1 Experiment set-up and program 3.2 Results and discussion 3.3 Conclusion VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

  34. 3.3 Conclusion • CP was effective, CPrev was not obtained • Some improvements for further research: • Integration of reference electrodes • >Suspicion of fibre influence on polarization • >Depolarization measurements • No addition of Chlorides to the mortar and prolonged experiment to investigate Cprev • More specimens (for Tafel experiments and statistical certitude) • Further research on effects of conductive fillers on mechanical behaviour • Further research on integrating this addition in fabrication of prefab laminates VABOR bijeenkomst - Philippe de Schoesitter

More Related