1 / 68

Lake Sunapee Region Strategic Planning Initiative

Lake Sunapee Region Strategic Planning Initiative. Meeting Four: Presenting the Data (06.23.13). Lake Sunapee Region Community Wellness Task Force Current Members. Meeting Agenda. 1:00-1:15 - Agenda, Role Assign, Overview

calais
Download Presentation

Lake Sunapee Region Strategic Planning Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lake Sunapee Region Strategic Planning Initiative Meeting Four: Presenting the Data (06.23.13)

  2. Lake Sunapee Region Community Wellness Task ForceCurrent Members

  3. Meeting Agenda 1:00-1:15 - Agenda, Role Assign, Overview 1:15-2:00- Presenting the Data: Social Determinants of Health & Service Area Health Data 2:00-2:30 - New London Hospital Programs & Successes 2:30-2:50- Keene Summit Summary 2:50-3:00- Next steps and next meeting date (6/29 from 3 – 5pm at Lake Sunapee Bank)

  4. Role Assignments Leader – Catherine Bardier Recorder – Lauren Conkey Timekeeper – Facilitator –

  5. OVERVIEW

  6. Process and Outcomes Forming a strong team Defining decision making process Clarifying our service area Studying landscape – who, what, where Drafting – Mission, Vision, Values, Goal One Developing action steps –”Employers as a vehicle for promoting community health and wellness” Collaborating with “Healthy Monadnock” and D-H

  7. Strategic Questions to Think About • What is our formal name? • Is anyone missing at this table? • Who needs to be giving input to our first drafts? • How will we make decisions now and in the future? • What will our infrastructure look like? • What are the limits of collaborative planning? • How will we make our work sustainable? • How will we fund this community work? • Priorities – short term and long term? • What are our outcome and process (economic, health, funding) measures? • What data do we need? • How to build public involvement and buy-in (on-going)? • Communication strategy? • How to continuously refresh our plan? • What are our measures of success?

  8. Timeline * Months with two meetings

  9. SERVICE AREA DATA 9

  10. Andover Bradford Croydon Danbury Goshen Grantham Lempster Newbury New London Newport Springfield Sunapee Sutton Warner Washington Wilmot Towns Serviced by NLH, Kearsarge and Newport School Districts: Anything missing?

  11. New London Hospital Patient Visits* FY2008/2009 * Includes inpatient and selected outpatient procedures Source: Uniform Hospital Data Discharge Set (UHDDS)

  12. Service Area Data: Demographics Highlighted towns have oldest median age

  13. Service Area Data: Demographics

  14. Determinants of Health Models Help Frame Data and Information

  15. Service Area Data: Disease & Injury

  16. Service Area Data: Disease & Injury

  17. Service Area Data: Disease & Injury Highlighted outcomes indicate statistically significant difference

  18. Service Area Data: Disease & Injury • Merrimack & Sullivan counties have statistically significant higher rates of premature death & substance abuse-related emergency hospital discharges than the state of NH • Sullivan county has a statistically significant higher rate of unintentional injury-related emergency hospital discharges than the state of NH

  19. Health & Function Physical Functioning Mental Functioning Role Functioning Social Functioning

  20. Service Area Data: Health & Function

  21. Service Area Data: Health Care

  22. Service Area Data: Health Care

  23. Service Area Data: Health Care

  24. Individual Response - Behaviors • Intermediate determinant • Behaviors e.g., diet, exercise, drinking, smoking, drug use, coping, are seen as responses to other factors • Not voluntary acts amenable to direct intervention • Shaped by multiple forces: social and physical environments and genetics • Behavior change remains a goal • “Health Eating Active Living”

  25. Service Area Data: Individual Behavior

  26. Service Area Data: Individual Behavior

  27. Service Area Data: Individual Behavior 62.6% 63.6% 63.0%

  28. Service Area Data: Individual Behavior

  29. Social Environment

  30. Service Area Data: Social Environment

  31. Service Area Data: Social Environment

  32. Service Area Data: Social Environment Lowest Income Highest Income

  33. Physical Environment

  34. Prosperity

  35. Service Area Data: Prosperity

  36. Service Area Data: Prosperity

  37. Service Area Data: Prosperity

  38. Service Area Data: Prosperity Least Affluent: Croydon, Danbury, Goshen, Lempster, Newport, Washington More affluent: Andover, Bradford, Grantham, New London, Newbury, Springfield, Sunapee, Sutton, Wilmot

  39. Service Area Data: Prosperity Lower Income: Croydon, Danbury, Goshen, Lempster, Newport, Washington Higher Income: Andover, Bradford, Grantham, New London, Newbury, Springfield, Sunapee, Sutton, Wilmot

  40. Service Area Data: Prosperity

  41. Service Area Data: Prosperity

  42. Service Area Data: Prosperity

More Related