1 / 14

Curriculum Reform Movement of the 1950’s and 60’s

Curriculum Reform Movement of the 1950’s and 60’s. Chapter 8: History of Ideas in Science Education Amanda Johnson & Mandi Brooks. How did we get here?. America had an unmet need for scientists and engineers in WWII Soviet launch of Sputnik in October 1957

calista-riley
Download Presentation

Curriculum Reform Movement of the 1950’s and 60’s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Curriculum Reform Movement of the 1950’s and 60’s Chapter 8: History of Ideas in Science Education Amanda Johnson & Mandi Brooks

  2. How did we get here? • America had an unmet need for scientists and engineers in WWII • Soviet launch of Sputnik in October 1957 • Perceived threat to national security brought on by the Cold War

  3. Shift in education from social relevance to traditional rigor • During the mid 1950’s, the NSF (funded by the federal government) financially supported several curriculum projects • Provide a set of curriculum materials of high quality and considerable appeal • Prepare students for entering into college science programs

  4. Projects funded by the NSF… • PHYSICS: Physical Science Study Committee- 1956 • BIOLOGY: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study- 1959 • CHEMISTRY: Chemical Bond Approach Project- 1957 Chemical Education Material Study- 1959 • EARTH SCIENCE: Secondary School Project- 1966 Earth Science Curriculum Project- 1967 • PHYSICAL SCIENCE: Introductory Physical Science- 1967 • ELEMENTARY SCIENCE: Science- A Process Approach- 1967 Study Elementary Science Study – 1969 Science Curriculum Improvement- 1970

  5. Commonalities of the Programs • Present a coherent set of related concepts with broad unifying themes • Reduction of the number of topic covered in favor for more current and in-depth study • Included historical dev’t of the subject • Excluded technological applications, relation to everyday life

  6. Reform Movement was led by college science professors with the help of school teachers • Education faculty played a secondary role, if any • A number of educational theorists lent considerable support and generated momentum

  7. Jerome Bruner • Noted psychologist from Harvard • The Woods Hole Conference (1959) • Supported new structure and inductive learning strategies • Felt there should be more intuitive or creative thought processes • Introduced Piaget’s work- translated into the concept of a “spiral curriculum”

  8. Joseph J Schwab • Curriculum theorist from University of Chicago; was part of BSCS in 1959 • Felt the nation faced three important needs: • additional scientists • competent political leaders • a public sympathetic to ongoing programs of scientific research

  9. Schwab’s new conceptions of science: • Scientists no longer viewed knowledge as stable truth • Fluid enquiry as a means to invention • New vital importance of science for discoveries, principles, and applications • Stressed the processes by which scientists generated the knowledge

  10. How successful were the new programs? • A number of studies investigated the effectiveness of the new programs… -NSF’s “National Survey”(1977) – -Suzanne Quick (1978) - effects on commercial textbooks -CHEM Study Group (1964)- evaluate any changes in enrollment into science classes

  11. “New Directions for Teaching Secondary School Science” • Written by Paul Hurd in 1970 • Identified specific pros and cons in his overall analyses of the projects

  12. Pros: • More up to date and valid information • Engaged students in independent, “discovery”- type investigations • Presented a more accurate picture of the nature of science • Dealt with smaller number of significant concepts taught in depth and in context

  13. Cons: • Too difficult for avg high school students • Didn’t seem to motivate students to study science- not related to real world, personal concerns, practical applications • Ignored the role of science in everyday life

  14. The national scope of the projects… • Funding by the federal government … • Widespread use of the courses… …made this effort unmatched in the history of American education. Sound familiar???

More Related