1 / 11

High Energy Physics Briefing to the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee

High Energy Physics Briefing to the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee. Dr. Robin Staffin Associate Director, Office of High Energy Physics DOE Office of Science February 13, 2006. DOE Office of High Energy Physics (HEP). Accelerator-based physics is our primary tool.

calum
Download Presentation

High Energy Physics Briefing to the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High Energy Physics Briefing to theAstronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Dr. Robin Staffin Associate Director, Office of High Energy Physics DOE Office of Science February 13, 2006

  2. DOE Office of High Energy Physics (HEP) Accelerator-based physics is our primary tool. • Construction & operation of accelerators and detectors Proton based: Fermilab Tevatron – top quarks, Higgs search, extra dimensions, supersymmetry; neutrino studies - NuMI, MiniBooNe, K2K Electron based: SLAC – b quarks, CP violation; also Belle  Future: Large Hadron Collider at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland and R&D for International Linear Collider Non-accelerator physics – growing and important sector • Atmospheric and solar neutrinos: SuperK, KamLAND, SNO • Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology to study dark matter, dark energy, high energy cosmic rays, high energy gamma rays • Currently: GLAST, Auger, VERITAS, SDSS, CDMS-II, AMS Theory • Elementary Particle Theory • Major Computing efforts: QCD simulation, data storage, distribution & analysis Technology R&D • R&D for accelerator & detector technologies

  3. The DOE HEP program in FY 2007 • Overall HEP budget and priorities in FY 2007: • Tevatron and B-factory supported for full scheduled Ops • LHC Support (Ops and Computing) up 8% as construction completes • Core research program at the universities (6%) and laboratories (2%) increased • Initiatives for the future of HEP: • ILC R&D doubled ($30M$60M) • Start of new neutrino initiatives • Electron Neutrino Appearance Experiment (EvA) • Reactor Neutrino Detector • Investment in long-term accelerator R&D increased +$5M • Dark Energy R&D • SNAP ($2.9M  $7.5M) • R&D for concepts (ground &/or space) is $5M. Concepts will be selected by open competition, peer review; DETF will guide us • funding levels reflect tentative plan which may change based upon advice from DETF and other relevant considerations

  4. High Energy Physics FY 2007 Budget ($M)

  5. ILC R&D • To support a U.S. leadership role in this coordinated international effort, DOE is doubling the ILC R&D budget in FY2007 Presidents Request ($30M$60M) • Enables significant progress on all major subsystems • Begins industrialization of key components so that U.S. industry can get “up to speed” and successfully compete for contracts if ILC is built • Includes detector R&D funding (a change from previous years) • Also includes U.S. contributions to GDE management & support • This is a major step forward for the ILC effort, although it is NOT yet • Approval of construction, or engineering design • The goal of the R&D program at this stage is to provide solid technical, cost and schedule information to governments to enable a decision on ILC construction around the turn of the decade.

  6. Neutrinos • APS Study The Neutrino Matrix recommended several new experiments in neutrino physics, including: • Reactor experiment to measure 13 via e disappearance • Accelerator-based experiment with comparable sensitivity to 13 as above AND sensitivity to mass hierarchy thru matter effects • Charge to Neutrino Scientific Assessment Group (NuSAG) in 2005 explicitly asked for further recommendations on which of the possible technical options to pursue in these two areas. • We are proceeding in the FY2007 request with these two experiments: • Reactor Neutrino Detector. Site TBD. NuSAG recommends either Daya Bay (China) or Braidwood (Illinois) for scientific reasons. Site selection by DOE in 2006. • Electron Neutrino Appearance (EvA) Experiment. Very large scintillator detector to observe e appearance in NuMI beam. • R&D for other items in the list of APS recommendations is proceeding (see later slide), in coordination with DOE Nuclear Physics and/or NSF

  7. Other Areas • Progress on other experimental initiatives (not exhaustive) • Dark energy experiment(s) • SNAP R&D continues as conceptual design for JDEM with NASA • R&D for new cameras on existing telescopes and/or new telescopes on ground or in space • In cooperation with NSF & NASA - based in part on DETF input • A neutrinoless double-beta decay experiment to probe the Majorana nature of neutrinos • 200kg Xenon experiment in operations by 2007 • R&D underway for large-scale (~1000kg) experiments with various isotopes (with DOE Nuclear Physics, and possibly NSF) • Dark Matter experiment(s) – direct detection • R&D for next-generation experiments, joint with NSF • Dark Matter Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) in preparation

  8. Accelerator R&D • In addition to increases in ILC R&D, there is in the FY2007 request an additional significant increase (+$5M, or ~18%)in the long-range R&D program that supports fundamental research into the physics of beams and accelerator technologies (“accelerator science”) • The goal is to enable the restoration of the accelerator science research program to the level needed to support long-term R&D on new particle acceleration techniques and technologies, such as: • Novel particle acceleration concepts • New superconductors and their application • Very high gradient accelerating structures • Advanced beam instrumentation • Theory and simulation of beams • User facilities to test these concepts • Advice from the community (e.g., J. Marx AARD panel) provide needed input for developing this program

  9. Core Research • We are supporting core experimental and theoretical research at labs and universities to maintain approximately the FY 2006 level-of-effort, or slightly above: • University-based physics research up ~6% overall • Lab-based physics research up ~2% overall • Goals: • To maintain strong participation in the Tevatron, B-factory and LHC physics programs • To help support research activities associated with new initiatives such as ILC R&D, neutrinos, dark energy, and dark matter (though most R&D funding for these activities comes from other sources). • Also includes ongoing (unchanged from FY06) HEP contributions to the cross-cutting SciDAC program and the Lattice QCD IT investment, joint with Nuclear Physics.

  10. Recent HEP Advisory Panels Panel Reports to Topic(s) Reports Due/Approved P5 HEPAP B-factory + Tevatron Ops * Nov 2005 New mid-scale initiatives mid 2006 NuSAG HEPAP & NSAC Double Beta Decay Exp’ts Sep 1, 2005 Reactor and off-axis expt’s * Dec 2005 Super nu beam mid 2006 AARD HEPAP US Accel R&D program July 2006 Dark Energy HEPAP & AAAC Dark Energy techniques * Feb 2006 Task Force CMB Task Force HEPAP & AAAC Future CMB initiatives Oct 2005 ILC & LHC HEPAP ILC/LHC “synergy” * Feb 2006 (short version sent to EPP2010 in July 2005) HEP Resource HEPAP Are there enough physicists to * Jan 2006 Working Group run the program? * HEPAP will consider these for approval at the March 2006 meeting

  11. Tactics  Strategy Agencies Advisory Committee Flow Chart DOE-NP NSF DOE-HEP NASA EPP 2010 HEPAP NSAC AAAC P5 NuSAG Other SAG’s

More Related