110 likes | 191 Views
DUAL FUEL GENERATION CAPACITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS Interim Findings Report. Presentation to. Planning Advisory Committee March 3, 2005. Engineers Scientists Consultants. www.essgroup.com. SCOPE OF ANALYSIS. ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT CAPABILITY
E N D
DUAL FUEL GENERATION CAPACITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS Interim Findings Report Presentation to Planning Advisory Committee March 3, 2005 Engineers Scientists Consultants www.essgroup.com
SCOPE OF ANALYSIS • ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT CAPABILITY • Determine dual fuel generating capacities and limitations • Consider geographic locations, seasonal limitations, and oil storage capacities • CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS • Determine regulatory, design, and operating constraints on dual fuel operation • Assess primary drivers leading to current conditions • EXPANSION STRATEGIES AND FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS • Identify strategies that may increase dual fuel capabilities • Assess feasibility of technical, regulatory and policy alternatives • Facilitate collaborative process with State Environmental Agency Staffs
TASK 1: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT • Universe of generators identified using ISO-NE CELT Report • Units classified by state, claimed fuel type(s), & capacity • Gas Only, Oil/Gas, Oil Only, Other (coal, nuclear, MSW, renewables) • Generator air permits obtained from agencies to identify limits • Units summarized by state, fuel type, and permit limits • Gas Only (no oil firing allowed by permit) • Gas w/oil back-up (oil firing limited by permit) • Oil Only w/limitations (annual operating limits in permit) • All other (oil w/o limits, coal, nuclear, renewables, MSW/TDF) • Initial Summary of on-site oil storage capacity • Determine generating capacity with quantity stored on site
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT – FINDINGS • Winter Capacity by Fuel Type (MW represent permitted capacity) • Total Capacity ~33,800 MW • Gas Only = 19% (6,300 MW) • Gas w/ limited oil back up = 21% (7,200 MW) • Oil Only w/ limitations = 2% (550 MW) • Oil w/ Gas = 12% (4,150 MW) • Oil unlimited = 11% (3,900 MW) • All other = 35% (11,700 MW) • Data shows that 40% of winter generating capacity (13,500 MW) is primarily dependant on natural gas
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT – FINDINGS • Regional Considerations (Permitted MW) TOTAL PORTION OF CAPACITY RELIANT ON GAS STATECAPACITYGAS ONLYGAS W/LTD OIL%TOTAL MA 14,700 MW 3,300 MW 2,900 MW 42% CT 8,200 MW 250 MW 2,000 MW 27% NH 4,150 MW 535 MW 800 MW 32% ME 3,650 MW 1,400 MW 350 MW 48% RI 2,050 MW 850 MW 1,200 MW 100% VT 1,050 MW 0 MW 0 MW 0%
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT – FINDINGS • Regional Considerations (Permitted MW Percentages) %NEPOOL PORTION OF CAPACITY RELIANT ON GAS STATECAPACITY%GAS ONLY%GAS W/ LTD OIL%TOTAL MA 44% 22% 20% 42% CT 24% 3% 24% 27% NH 12% 13% 19% 32% ME 11% 38% 10% 48% RI 6% 41% 59% 100% VT 3% 0% 0% 0%
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT - FINDINGS • Dual Fuel Units – Permit Limitations on Oil Firing • 7,200 MW of gas-fired capacity has limits on firing liquids • 270 MW allowed between 2,300-3,800 hours per year (4%) • ½ in MA, ½ in RI • 1,400 MW allowed up to ~ 2 months per year (20%) • 80% in RI – allowed only when gas is “not available” per air permits • 4,800 MW allowed 30 days or less per year (67%) • Mostly CT and MA units • 1,350 MW in CT allowed only when gas is “not available” per Siting Council Certificates • Oil use is predominantly discretionary (i.e. not limited by season or linked to gas being “not available”) • On-Site Oil Storage Capacity • 3,900 MW of dual fuel units have less than 2 days of oil firing storage capacity on site (54%)
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT - FINDINGS • Historical Oil Firing Data for Dual Fuel Units • 2002 = 933 MWHr • 2003 = 65,351 MWHr • 1st Quarter 2004 = 364,415 MWHr • Q1 2004 oil firing represents 5-fold increase over all of 2003 and 8% of annual permitted oil firing capacity of all dual fuel units • Nearly all dual fuel facilities permitted to fire oil have done so in the past 2 years • Prospective oil firing considerations • Interest in expanding oil firing capability demonstrated by: • RI facilities seeking clarification and/or elimination of gas “not available” permit clause • CT facilities seeking Siting Council approval to eliminate gas “not available” condition from their Siting Council Certificate. • 2 or more facilities seeking permit changes to increase allowable oil firing hours
CONSTRAINTS ON DUAL FUEL CAPACITY Air Permitting (State, Federal PSD/NSR) Ambient Impacts BACT/LAER Water Use Withdrawal & Discharge Siting Boards/Councils Resource protection issues Transportation impacts Local Approvals & Hearings On-Site Technical Issues Impacts on equipment Staffing Lead time Delivery Dual Fuel Availability Interruptible Supply Low/Very Low Sulfur Distillate Off-site Storage Capacity Infrastructure/Transportation Economics Heat rates & spark spread Maintenance Plant Modifications
EXPANSION STRATEGIES & FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS • Near-Term (2004/2005 Heating Season) • ISO Cold Weather Event Operating Procedure • Regional framework for emergency provisions under severe weather & strained capacity (modeled under Mass 7.53 rule) • Procedures under individual state statutory authorities for emergencies • Evaluation of generation use and concerns • Mid-Term • Seek increased dual fuel capacity and capability • Generation decision • Some permitting already in process • Long-Term • Engagement & Analysis of oil suppliers • Storage capacity, contracts, fleet & staff • Development of Regional Generation Rules • Banking programs, permit modification processes • Diversification of Supply and Demand • Distributed Generation, Demand Response, Alternative energy sources
EXPANSION STRATEGIES & FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS • Next Steps • Development of Policy & Implementation tools w/ regulators for 2004/2005 heating season (procedures under statutory authorities for emergencies) • Assessment of generators’ use and concerns • Collaborative development of longer term approaches to regulatory issues