180 likes | 348 Views
Wind Energy: A National Perspective. 2006: US 3rd highest cumulative wind capacity globally (13,078 MW)Texas has the most installed wind capacity, followed by California, and IowaWind development in the US is expected to increase by 25-30% in 2007. U.S. Fish
E N D
1. Wind Turbine Guidelines Advisory Committee January 2008
David J. Stout
Chief, Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation
Committee Chairman and Designated Federal Officer
2. Wind Energy: A National Perspective 2006: US 3rd highest cumulative wind capacity globally (13,078 MW)
Texas has the most installed wind capacity, followed by California, and Iowa
Wind development in the US is expected to increase by 25-30% in 2007
3. Wind Energy: A National Perspective
4. Wind Energy: DOI Perspective ~ 80% of US installed wind capacity is on Federal lands
46% BLM-managed land has commercial wind energy potential
MMS has authority in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to permit offshore wind, wave and other alternative energy facilities
FWS developed voluntary, interim guidelines to minimize and avoid the potential impacts of land-based wind turbines on wildlife.
5. Wind Turbine Guidelines Advisory Committee: Background 2003: Service published Interim Guidelines to Avoid and Minimize Wildlife Impacts from Wind Turbines
2005: Service threatened with litigation because of efforts to update interim guidelines outside of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) process
6. Wind Turbine Guidelines Advisory Committee: Background 2007: Formation of a Wind Turbine Guidelines Advisory Committee, and call for nominations
Service recommended 22 individuals after evaluating nominees using criteria published in the Federal Register
Secretary appointed 22 Committee members and signed the Charter on October 26, 2007
7. Committee Members Dr. Taber Allison, Massachusetts Audubon Society
Mr. Michael Azeka, AES Wind Generation
Ms. Kathy Boydston, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Mr. Mike Daulton, National Audubon Society
Ms. Aimee Delach, Defenders of Wildlife
Mr. Greg Hueckel, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Ms. Jeri Lawrence, Blackfeet Nation
Mr. Steve Lindenberg, Department of Energy
Mr. Andrew O. Linehan, PPM Energy
Mr. Robert Manes, The Nature Conservancy, Kansas
Dr. James Russell Mason, Nevada Department of Wildlife
Ms. Winifred Perkins, Florida Power and Light Company
Mr. Steven Quarles, Crowell & Moring LLP
Mr. Rich Rayhill, Ridgeline Energy, LLC
Dr. Robert Robel, Kansas State University
Mr. Keith Sexson, Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks
Mr. Mark Sinclair, Clean Energy States Alliance/Clean Energy Group
Mr. David J. Stout, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Mr. Patrick D. Traylor, Hogan & Hartson, LLP
8. Committee Structure David J. Stout: Chairman and Designated Federal Officer
Abby Arnold: Facilitator
Technical Subcommittee
Interagency Caucus
9. Committee Scope and Objective
The Committee will provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of the Interior on developing effective measures to avoid or minimize impacts to wildlife and their habitats related to land-based wind energy facilities
10. Facilitator Abby Arnold conducted interviews in spring and fall of 2007
Susan Goodwin, DOI, conducted interviews with other Federal agencies
Issues raised fell into several categories:
Process
Policy
Technical
11. Federal standard vs. voluntary guidance
Service commitment to use of Committee recommendations?
Start with current draft voluntary guidelines?
12. Policy Issues Federal role in reviewing wind permits
Coordination with State policy – consistency with State guidelines
Wind development on Tribal lands
Leadership opportunities to develop recommendations that address Federal framework (beyond FWS)
Wind in context with other current issues
Models for framework: HCPs, Oil & Gas recovery plans, Avian Protection Plans
What kind of framework will incentivize industry to minimize impacts?
Precedent for green technologies
13. Technical Issues Research questions
Risk-based determinations/Context of risk
What is the state of the science; what are the best methods to assess impact; minimize impact?
Study sites representative of different regional characteristics for a more comprehensive analysis of impacts
Focus on populations, not individuals
Scoring or ranking sites used in interim guidelines unfeasible due to lack of hard science
Methodology for pre- and post-assessment
14. Interest in regular interagency communication
Will FWS guidelines be applied to public lands?
Need consistency with other federal guidelines and in application
Opportunity to identify and fill research gaps and distribute information
What will be the intersection of NEPA, ESA, and MBTA?
15. Service Responsibilities Committee reports to the Secretary through the Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Committee Chairman and Designated Federal Officer responsibilities
FWS Technical Advisory Team
16. Service Program Participation Outreach to Regional and Field Staff
Regular e-mail updates and conference calls
FWS Technical Advisory Group
Attendance at Committee meetings (limited)
Other suggestions?
17. Wind Turbine Guidelines Advisory Committee: DOI Participation How can DOI bureaus:
Keep informed?
http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/windpower/windturbine_advisory_committee.html
Provide comment?
There will be opportunity to comment at all Committee meetings
Be involved?
Participate in the Federal caucus
18. Draft Road Map
19. FWS Contacts Dave Stout – Committee Chairman and DFO
Chief, Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation
703-358-2161
Dave_Stout@fws.gov
George Allen
Chief, Branch of Policies, Permits & Regulations
703-358-1825
George_T_Allen@fws.gov
Rachel London
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
703-358-2161
Rachel_London@fws.gov