240 likes | 260 Views
HBR Case: New Recruit Negotiation, Role of Recruiter vs. Candidate. 任 維廉 at NCTU, 2017. Types of negotiation issues 1. Compatible items Both parties want the same thing Job assignment, location 2. Distributive items Gain for one is a lose to the other
E N D
HBRCase: New Recruit Negotiation, Role of Recruiter vs. Candidate 任維廉 at NCTU, 2017
Types of negotiation issues 1. Compatible items • Both parties want the same thing • Job assignment, location 2. Distributive items • Gain for one is a lose to the other • Starting date, salary 3. Integrative items • Create value for mutual gain • What recruiter cares more • Vacation time, insurance coverage • What candidate cares more • Bonus, Moving expense coverage
Compatible items: 1. Job Assignment, Both parties want the same thing
Compatible items: 2. Location, Both parties want the same thing
Distributive items: 3. Salary, Gain for one is a lose to the other
Distributive items: 4. Starting date, Gain for one is a lose to the other
Integrative items: 5. Vacation time, What recruiter cares more
Integrative items: 6. Insurance coverage, What recruiter cares more
Integrative items: 8. Moving expense coverage, What candidate cares more
Create value vs. Claim value Create Claim Good Great Create Good Terrible Mediocre Terrible Claim Mediocre Great
Negotiating problem • The truth is everyone is greedy, especially for the loser. • Value creator or value claimer? • For integrative items, it’s hard to get a mutual gain. • In real life, integrative items are possibly used to compensate the lose of distributive items. • The best predictor of an agreement value is the midpoint of the first offerand first counteroffer (within the bargaining zone)
Negotiating Effectiveness • Exercise on the recruiting • Explore the demand • Find the easy issue to deal • Create value for candidate • Claim value 1.Compatible issue 2.Integrative issue 3.Distributive issue In this case, recruiter should not get too much because we are looking for a good employee to work for long time
Conclusion • Types of negotiation issues: 1. Compatible, 2. Distributive: single issue, price, salary, fixed pie, win / lose, claim value, adversarial behavior, concealing information 3. Integrative: assumptions, win / win, trade off, value creation, long-term relationship • Balance of interests: understand what they need /work together to maximize the benefit. 己所不欲,勿施於人? • First offer: anchoring effect Concessions: enjoy back-and-forth dance, • The negotiator’s dilemma: create value must be claimed Managing the dilemma: pay attention to sequencing, discuss a roadmap for the negotiation process * Urgent message
Takeaways: 如何談薪水 • 你最好還有其他選擇,Your / His BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement), pitch yourself, expand pie, buildmutualvalue. • 蒐集情資:網站,朋友……Information asymmetry, 俊廷 • 聚焦在雙贏,Creating Value: Gather information, Manage concessions, Make multi-issue proposal. Must / Want: Employee: +3~6%, Employer: +1~5%, 1st offer, high but realistic, provide a justification. Concession, ignore other’s offer, find other information, calm down, 換位思考,supportive / defensivecommunication. • 薪水不是唯一的談判內容,還有成長、成就感… growthmindset. 交通大學管理學院 任維廉教授
Q & A E-Mail:wljen@mail.nctu.edu.tw 個人網頁:http://140.113.119.160/
Takeaway:important, and non-obvious, 喔!這個地方我原來沒想到! Important Unimportant Important Don’t waste your time Non-case teaching Obvious Obvious Cocktail chatter Takeaway Not obvious
Case study: a manager’s dilemma • Identify and articulate business problems • Gather and analyze information applicable • Identify and apply an appropriate tool for solving problems.