1.07k likes | 1.4k Views
Pegasys + Copegus Combination Therapy. BLA 125061/NDA 21-511 Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting November 14, 2002. Pegasys Monotherapy Indication. Indication:
E N D
Pegasys + Copegus Combination Therapy BLA 125061/NDA 21-511 Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting November 14, 2002
Pegasys Monotherapy Indication • Indication: Pegasys, Peginterferon alfa-2a, is indicated for the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis C who have compensated liver disease and have not been previously treated with interferon alpha. Patients in whom efficacy was demonstrated included patients with compensated cirrhosis. • Dosage and Administration 180 g once weekly for 48 weeks
Pegasys + Copegus Proposed Label Additions • Pegasys, Peginterferon alfa-2a, in combination with Copegus, ribavirin, is indicated for the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis C who have compensated liver disease and have not been previously treated with interferon alpha. Patients in whom efficacy was demonstrated included patients with compensated cirrhosis. • Dosage and administration accordingto genotype: • Treatment duration • Ribavirin dose
Regulatory History of Application July 16, 1998US IND submitted October 6, 1998End of phase II meeting August 9, 2000Fast-Track designation May 7, 2002Pre-BLA/NDA meeting June 3, 2002BLA/NDA Filed to FDA October 16, 2002Pegasys monotherapy approved November 14, 2002Advisory Committee
Roche Presentation Agenda IntroductionCandice Teuber, Pharm.D. Overview of Pegasys-CopegusJoseph Hoffman, M.D. Development Program EfficacyFrank Duff, M.D. SafetyJonathan Solsky, M.D. ConclusionsJoseph Hoffman, M.D.
Experts Available for Q & A Donald M. Jensen, M.D. Director, Section of Hepatology Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical CenterChicago, IL Mitchell Shiffman, M.D. Chief, Hepatology Section,Virginia Commonwealth University Health System Medical College of Virginia Richmond, VA
Roche Experts Available for Q & A Clinical ScienceMichael Brunda, Ph.D. ToxicologyCeline Eliahou, M.S. StatisticsAmy Lin, M.S. Clinical PharmacologyMatthew Lamb, Pharm.D. Clinical PharmacologyKarin Jorga, Ph.D.
Pegasys + Copegus Combination Therapy Overview Dr. Joseph Hoffman VP & Group Leader,Virology and Transplantation
Background • Rationale for development of Pegasys • Overview of clinical program • Dose selection in combination therapy program
SVR: Difficult-to-Treat Disease IFN alfa 3 or 6/3 MIU tiw x 48 wks SVR 11% -19% 7% 5% 1% - 2% <1% Overall Geno 1 Cirrhosis Geno 1,HVL Geno 1,Cirrhosis Zeuzem et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1666-1672 Heathcote et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1673-1680 Pockros et al. 41st ICAAC Meeting. 2001:285(Abstract H-457) Roche data on file
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 14 12 10 8 Periods of time when IFN is not detectable in circulation 6 4 2 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 Pharmacokinetics of Standard Alpha Interferons Interferon (U/mL) Time (hours) First dose measured; others simulated Roche data on file
O CH3OCH2CH2(OCH2CH2)n O C NH a CH2 Lysine (CH2)3 mPEG e CH Interferon O CH3OCH2CH2(OCH2CH2)n O C NH CNH O Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40KD)
Pegasys • Soluble formulation • Retains immunomodulatory and antiproliferative properties • Sustained action • Decreased clearance • Extended absorptive phase • Limited volume of distribution • Allows unit dosing
After first dose 15 10 Mean Concentration (ng/mL) 5 0 Weekly Dose Given Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Weekly Dose Given NV15496Pegasys Systemic Concentrations – 180 g sc Once Weekly
Change in Pegasys Total Apparent Body Clearance vs Total Body Weight
Comprehensive Pegasys Clinical Program • Dose-finding study • Study in patients with cirrhosis • Study vs standard IFN • Study vs induction regimen IFN Monotherapy 2/97 12/99 • 1600 patients were enrolled in 4 separate Phase II and III trials in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients • 1001 patients were randomized to Pegasysand 599 patientswere randomized to Roferon-A
NV15489Phase II Dose-finding Study SVR N = 33 N = 20 N = 20 N = 45 N = 41 Roferon-A 3 MIU Pegasys 45 µg Pegasys 90 µg Pegasys 180 µg Pegasys 270 µg Reddy et al. Hepatology. 2001;33:433-438
NV15489Dose-finding Study: SVR in Genotype 1 31% Genotype 1 SVR 14% N = 14 N = 35 Pegasys 90 µg Pegasys 180 µg Reddy et al. Hepatology. 2001;33:433-438
NV15495Sustained Virological Response in Patients with Cirrhosis SVR N = 88 N = 96 N = 87 *P= 0.001 vs Roferon-A; **NS vs Roferon-A Heathcote et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1673-1680
NV15496Virological Response at Weeks 24 and 72 Pegasys 135 g vs 180 g Virological Response N = 214 N = 215 N = 210 N = 214 N = 215 N = 210 HCV RNA undetectable (<100 copies/mL) *P = 0.01 vs Roferon-A at week 72 Pockros et al. 41st ICAAC Meeting. 2001:285 (Abstract H-457) and Roche data on file
NV15496Histological Response: Pegasys 135 g vs 180 g in Patients with Paired Biopsies Histological Response† N = 147 N = 171 N = 160 †Histological response defined as 2 point decrease in HAI score *NS vs Roferon-A **P = 0.017 vs Roferon-A Pockros et al. 41st ICAAC Meeting. 2001:285 (Abstract H-457) and Roche data on file
Overview of Adverse Events in Integrated Summary of Safety for Pegasys Monotherapy Pegasys Pegasys 135 g 180 g Adverse Event (N = 215) (N = 604) Severe AEs 30% 32% Serious AEs 10% 9% Treatment-related serious AEs* 3% 5% AEs and laboratory abnormalities leading to withdrawal 10% 10% AEs and laboratory abnormalities requiring dose modification 21% 27% *Events judged by investigator to be possibly or probably related to treatment
SVR: Difficult-to-Treat Disease IFN alfa 3 or 6/3 MIU tiw x 48 wks SVR 11% -19% 7% 5% 1% - 2% <1% Overall Geno 1 Cirrhosis Geno 1,HVL Geno 1,Cirrhosis Zeuzem et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1666-1672 Heathcote et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1673-1680 Pockros et al. 41st ICAAC Meeting. 2001;285 (Abstract H-457) Roche data on file
SVR: Difficult-to-Treat Disease Pegasys 180 g qw x 48 wks 28% -39% SVR 30% 22% - 28% 14% 13% Overall Geno 1 Cirrhosis Geno 1,HVL Geno 1,Cirrhosis Zeuzem et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1666-1672 Heathcote et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1673-1680 Pockros et al. 41st ICAAC Meeting. 2001;285 (Abstract H-457) Roche data on file
Comprehensive Pegasys Clinical Program Monotherapy 2/97 12/99 Combination Therapy 10/98 1/02 • Pilot safety study • Comparative trial vs Rebetron • Duration and dosing by genotype trial
Ribavirin • Better efficacy seen with combination than IFN alone • Teratogenic and mutagenic; induces hemolysis • Dose of 1000 or 1200 mg is safe and efficacious with standard IFN • Pegasys 180 g and 1000 or 1200 mg of ribavirin tolerated in pilot safety study (NV15800) • No PK interaction between ribavirin and IFN
0-24h AUC Predicted Copegus Exposure1000 or 1200 mg Body-Weight-Adjusted Dose 70 1000 mg 1200 mg 60 50 40 <75 kg 75 kg 30 20 10 0 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Body Weight (kg)
PegasysCombination Development Program • Pegasys (180 g) + Placebo • Intron A (3 MIU) + Rebetol (1000 or 1200 mg) • Pegasys (180 g) + Copegus (1000 or 1200 mg) Phase II: NV15800 10/98 3/00 Phase III: NV15801 2/99 4/01 48 Weeks
SVR: Rebetron Registration Trials SVR N = 505 N = 504 McHutchison et al. Seminars in Liver Disease. 1999;19(suppl 1):57-65
PegasysCombination Development Program Phase II: NV15800 10/98 3/00 Phase III: NV15801 2/99 4/01 • Comparative Trial vs Rebetron Phase III: NV15942 11/99 1/02 • Duration and Dosing by Genotype Trial
Pegasys + Copegus Optimization of Therapy • Duration of combination therapy • Pegasys weekly dose • Copegus daily dose
Copegus Dose Selection • Chose Copegus 1000 or 1200 mg in control arm to bridge to comparative trial • No powered dose-finding trials with ribavirin were available • Literature and anecdotal experience suggested ribavirin dose of 800 mg might be adequate but 600 mg too low
Pegasys + Copegus Optimization of Therapy • Duration of combination therapy 24 vs 48 weeks • Pegasys weekly dose 180 g • Copegus daily dose 800 vs 1000 or 1200 mg
Pegasys Combination Program Designed to Evaluate: • Efficacy and safety of Pegasys + Copegus across genotypes • vs Rebetron • vs Pegasys monotherapy • Impact of shorter treatment duration on response for genotype 1 and genotype non-1 • Impact of lower Copegus dose on response for genotype 1 and genotype non-1
Pegasys + Copegus Combination Therapy Efficacy Results Dr. Frank Duff Clinical Leader
Study NV15801 Comparative Trial vs Rebetron
NV15801Efficacy Objectives Primary • Compare efficacy of Pegasys + Copegusvs Rebetron Secondary • Compare efficacy of Pegasys + Copegusvs Pegasys monotherapy • Compare efficacy across treatment armsby HCV genotype
NV15801Study Design • Randomized • Open label for Pegasys and Rebetron • Blinded for Copegus vs placebo (Pegasys arms) • Stratified by • Country • HCV genotype
NV15801Study Design: Treatment Pegasys 180 g sc qw + Copegus 1000 or 1200 mg po daily Follow-up Rebetron (Intron A 3 MIU sc tiw +Rebetol 1000 or 1200 mg po daily) Follow-up Screen Pegasys 180 g sc qw + Placebo Follow-up 0 48 72 Weeks
NV15801Study Design • Primary endpoint • Combined sustained virological response (SVR) and sustained biochemical response (SBR) at end of follow-up • Secondary endpoints • SVR • SBR • End-of-follow-up histological response (20% of patients) • Analysis population • All patients randomized
NV15801Major Inclusion Criteria • Serological evidence of HCV infection • HCV RNA >2000 copies/mL • Elevated serum ALT • Liver biopsy consistent with CHC • Compensated liver disease • Child-Pugh grade A • Age 18 years • Naïve to interferon and ribavirin
NV15801Major Exclusion Criteria • Decompensated liver disease • Child-Pugh grades B and C • Coinfection with HIV or HBV • Anemia or inability to tolerate anemia • Hb <12 g/dL (F) or 13 g/dL (M) • Significant co-morbid medical conditions
NV15801Patient Characteristics Pegasys + Pegasys Copegus Rebetron (N = 227) (N = 465) (N = 457) Genotype 1 (%) 64 66 64 HCV RNA titer(mean, x 106 copies/mL) 5.8 6.0 6.0 Cirrhosis/Bridging Fibrosis (%) 15 12 12 Age (mean, y) 42 43 42 Weight (mean, kg) 79 80 78 Male (%) 67 71 73 All patients randomized
NV15801Summary of Reasons for Premature Withdrawal from Treatment Pegasys + Pegasys Copegus Rebetron (N = 224) (N = 453) (N = 444) Safety 7% 10% 11% Nonsafety Insufficient therapeutic response 22% 8% 13% Refused treatment/failed to return 4%4% 7% Protocol violation0% <1% <1% Administrative 0% 0% <1% Total 25% 12% 21% Total prematurely withdrawn 32% 22% 32%
NV15801Protocol Defined Analyses Pegasys Pegasys + +Copegus Rebetron Copegus Pegasys (N = 465) (N = 457) P-value (N = 465) (N = 227) P-value SVR 50% 42% 0.004 50% 27% 0.001 SBR 50% 43% 0.022 50% 32% 0.001 SVR +SBR 45% 39% 0.057 45% 24% 0.001 All patients randomized
NV15801Virological Analyses • Validated HCV RNA assays now available • Virological response preferred as efficacy endpoint • SVR defined as 2 negative HCV RNA assessments (<100 copies/mL) at least 21 days apart after week 60 • All treated population
NV15801 SVR – All Genotypes P = 0.001 P = 0.005 SVR N = 224 N = 453 N = 444 All treated, SVR = 2 HCV RNA <100 copies/mL
NV15801 SVR by Genotype P = 0.002 P = 0.044 P = 0.001 P = 0.046 SVR N = 145 N = 298 N = 285 N = 79 N = 155 N = 159 All treated, SVR = 2 HCV RNA <100 copies/mL
NV15801 SVR Genotype 1 by Viral Load SVR N = 44 N = 115 N = 94 N = 101 N = 182 N = 189 All treated, SVR = 2 HCV RNA <100 copies/mL
NV15801Efficacy Findings • Pegasys and Copegus SVR superior to Rebetron and to Pegasys monotherapy • Overall • Genotype 1 • Contributed to by HVL and LVL responses • Genotype non-1