90 likes | 103 Views
This document highlights the actions taken by IEEE 802.11 WNG during the March 2005 Interim meeting in Atlanta.
E N D
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:WNG Liaison Report, March 2005 Date Submitted: 3/16/2005 Source: Jeyhan Karaoguz , Broadcom Corp. Address 16215 Alton Parkway, P.O. Box 57013, Irvine, CA 92619-7013 Voice: 949 585 6168, FAX: 949 450 0754, E-Mail: jeyhan@broadcom.com Abstract: This document highlights the actions taken by the IEEE 802.11 WNG during the March 2005 Interim meeting in Atlanta Purpose: Liaison report Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. J. Karaoguz, Broadcom Corp.
IEEE 802.11 WNG Liaison Report for March 2005 Jeyhan Karaoguz J. Karaoguz, Broadcom Corp.
Contribution Highlights • IEEE 802.11 Future Directions (11-05-0171-00-0wng-802-11-future-directions.ppt) • Do we need to think beyond PHY and MAC to allow IEEE 802.11 standard to evolve. • If so, why? • Why not in IEEE 802.1? • Experts reside in IEEE 802.11 • Chasing different groups in different WGs will slow progress and other standards may capture the market place. • Without evolution or revolution, what is the future of IEEE 802.11 to maintain its market position? • Evolution beyond PHY and MAC J. Karaoguz, Broadcom Corp.
Contribution Highlights • Neighborhood Area Networks (11-05-0173-00-0000-4g-neighborhood-area-networks.ppt) • New architectural system element for broadband wireless local distribution applications • Service area smaller than Metropolitan, larger than Local Area Networks • “Street Level” Distribution • Similar to VDSL wiring radius, cable branch node breakout size • Usually part a of multi-tier distribution architecture • May interface with radio or wired facilities at both ends • Application in residential, campus, public environments • Consistent with community aesthetics • Extends the distribution network edge to the premises gateway J. Karaoguz, Broadcom Corp.
Contribution Highlights • Service Provider Requirements Tutorial (11-05-0208-01-0wng-service-provider-requirements-tutorial.ppt) Highest possible consumer satisfaction… if WLAN doesn’t work faultlessly consumers blame Service Provider or set provider • QoS - primary requirement – video and high throughput data sessions (possibly pedestrian-speed mobile) • Streaming, high data rate video delivery, error free, with WLAN bandwidth priority • Management capability of WLAN resources/bandwidth • Reach versus rate, surrender some rate to get best reach • Longer Range with high data rate to enable extended range applications • Target reach/rates ~150m@45 Mbps and ~300m@25 Mbps • Mobility support • Reduce Doppler Effect – ex. support for WLAN sets in pedestrian speed sessions • Handoff • Mesh • Tight integration with mobile services to support IMS/MMS • Validate Encryption meets Content Provider requirements • Testability of any functionality to ensure qualification and certification ► 802.11 action eliminates the need for proprietary solutions, boosts the market J. Karaoguz, Broadcom Corp.
Contribution Highlights • Ambient Networks Scenario(11-05-0157-00-0wng-ambient-networks-scenario.ppt) • Ambient Networks (AN) is an integrated project (IP) co-sponsored by the European Commission under the Information Society Technology (IST) priority under the 6th Framework Programme. The project addresses the strategic objective of "Mobile and Wireless Systems Beyond 3G". • The Ambient Networks project will create the network solutions for mobile and wireless systems beyond 3G. It will enable scalable and affordable wireless networking while providing rich and easy to use communication services for all. It is geared towards increasing competition and cooperation in an environment populated by a multitude of user devices, wireless technologies, network operators and business actors. J. Karaoguz, Broadcom Corp.
Contribution Highlights • 3650-3700 MHz FCC Action (11-05-0223-00-0wng-3650-3700-mhz-fcc-action.ppt) • The Commission found that the public record developed in this proceeding supports multiple users sharing this spectrum through the use of “contention-based” protocols to minimize interference among fixed and mobile operations. New fixed and mobile stations will therefore be required to use contention-based protocols, which will reduce the possibility of interference from co-frequency operation by managing each station’s access to spectrum. The Commission concluded that this approach is a reasonable, cost-effective method for ensuring that multiple users can access the spectrum. • The Commission gave all licensees the mutual obligation to cooperate and avoid harmful interference to one another. Mobile stations also will be required to positively receive and decode an enabling signal transmitted by a base station. The Commission determined that this approach will ensure that mobile stations operate within range of registered base stations, thereby avoiding interference to grandfathered FSS and Federal Government stations. Fixed stations will be allowed to operate with a peak power limit of 25 Watts per 25 megahertz bandwidth, and mobile stations with a peak power limit of 1 Watt per 25 megahertz bandwidth. J. Karaoguz, Broadcom Corp.
Contribution Highlights • 802.22 Liaison Report (11-05-0220-00-0wng-802-22-liaison-report-atlanta.ppt) 802.22 Schedule • Requirements definition March-May 05 [FCC Apr-Jun R&O] • Wireless microphone beacon study group approved March ‘05 • .22 Proposals/Contributions in May-July ‘05, • Need WG Tech Editor July ’05 • Wireless microphone beacon PAR and 5C July ’05 • Wireless microphone beacon Proposals/Contributions Sept-Nov ‘05 • .22 Consolidation in Nov ‘05 • .22 WG 1st Draft by Jan ‘06 • mid ‘07 to Sponsor Ballot J. Karaoguz, Broadcom Corp.
Relevant Documents • 11-05-0188-00-0wng-wng-sc-report.ppt • 11-05-0171-00-0wng-802-11-future-directions.ppt • 11-05-0173-00-0000-4g-neighborhood-area-networks.ppt • 11-05-0208-01-0wng-service-provider-requirements-tutorial.ppt • 11-05-0157-00-0wng-ambient-networks-scenario.ppt • 11-05-0223-00-0wng-3650-3700-mhz-fcc-action.ppt • 11-05-0220-00-0wng-802-22-liaison-report-atlanta.ppt J. Karaoguz, Broadcom Corp.