1 / 15

MfDR in Thailand

MfDR in Thailand. Community of Practice on Managing for Development Results Manila, Philippines, March 22-23, 2006. Outline. Overview of RBM and Public Sector Development MfDR in Development Cooperation Experiences and Lessons Learned Recommendations.

carmelita-aguilar
Download Presentation

MfDR in Thailand

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MfDR in Thailand Community of Practice on Managing for Development Results Manila, Philippines, March 22-23, 2006

  2. Outline • Overview of RBM and Public Sector Development • MfDR in Development Cooperation • Experiences and Lessons Learned • Recommendations

  3. Public Administration Act (#5) B.E 2545 (2002) Section 3/1 Benefits that accrue to the Thai people Results – based management Effective administration Worthiness of government functions De-layering of work processes (streamlining) Abolishment of unnecessary agencies & functions Decentralization of missions and resources to local administrative units Empowerment in decision-making Facilitation of and responsiveness to the needs of the people; and Accountability for endorsements

  4. Royal Decree on Rules and Procedures for Good Public Administration, B.E. 2546 (2003) In performing its duties, government agency, for results-based management shall : (1) make its performance plan prior to the carrying out any mission; (2) specify in the performance plan under (1) details on steps of works, operation period and the budget for each step, objective, result and key performance indicator of the mission; (3) follow-up and evaluate the performance plan under the rules and procedures as specified by such government agency which shall comply with standard rules and procedures on such matters as specified by PDC; (4) in the case when the carrying out the mission or performance plan affects people, it is the duty of the government agency to solve the problem or alleviate the effects or change the performance plan to be more suitable. Section 9

  5. Other sections Performance agreement A Four Year Public Administration Plan A Four Year Performance Plan An Annual Performance Plan Bonus Saved budget for improving the effectiveness of its duty

  6. Performance Agreement Public Administration Plan 4 year performance plan 05 06 07 08 Performance agreement for fiscal year 2006

  7. Evaluation of the Performance Agreement Customer Perspective Financial Perspective Perspective 2 : Quality of Service The agency can deliver good services that are satisfied by the customers Perspective 1 : Effectiveness of Strategies The agency can accomplish goals & targets of the strategic plan Perspective 4 : Organization Development The agency can prepare for change for examples the development of the database system, personnel administration and knowledge management etc. Perspective 3 : Efficiency of work The agency can reduce cost and time for delivering service. Internal Process Perspective Learning & Growth perspective

  8. Framework for evaluation Perspective 3 Efficiency of work Wt : 10 Perspective 1 Effectiveness of strategies Wt : 50 Perspective 2 Quality of service Wt : 10 Perspective 4 Organization development Wt : 30 Budget management Energy saving Reduction of service time Budget saving Unit cost implementation Quality of service People participation Prevention & get rid of corruption Accomplishment of a strategic plan Knowledge management Developing of database system Personnel development Law development Organization development Risk management Individual scorecard

  9. SAR- Card

  10. Reward for Performance Cash Bonus Saved budget Non – cash Trophy

  11. Circumstances • Lack of Full Participation from AllLevels • Insufficient Communication of the Implementing Agencies • Need to Further Develop New Organizational Culture

  12. RBM Approach in Development Cooperation • Country Level (Impact) - Economic and Social Development Plan - Technical Assistance Plan 2. Ministry Level (Outcome) - Sectoral Plan • Program / Project (Input) - Programming Approach - Application of Logical Framework Model

  13. Key Success Factors on RBM • TA is prepared in line with the National Development Plan • Sense of Ownership • High Absorptive Capacity • Strong Focal Point • Strong Policy Coherence • Timely Fit with the Development Stage

  14. Experiences / Lessons Learned • Participation of Concerned Authorities • Ownership • Policy / Plan Coherence • Comprehensive Plan • Absorptive Capacity

  15. Recommendations • Strategic Planning is Required • Sectoral / Programming Approach • Logical Framework / Project Design Matrix • Holistic Approach • Value Chained / Agenda Based • Consortium for Development • Institution Linkage

More Related