10 likes | 137 Views
http://www.win.tue.nl/~acristea/A3H/. “ Are there differences between A3EH authoring and A3H authoring ? ”. Panel summary . Panelists: Vincent Wade, Peter Brusilovsky, Marcus Specht, Alexandra Cristea; chair: Rosa Carro A3H: more generic; A3EH + A3CH + … ? Pro A3EH as different from A3H:
E N D
http://www.win.tue.nl/~acristea/A3H/ • “Are there differences between A3EH authoring and A3H authoring?” Panel summary • Panelists: Vincent Wade, Peter Brusilovsky, Marcus Specht, Alexandra Cristea; • chair: Rosa Carro • A3H: more generic; A3EH + A3CH + … ? • Pro A3EH as different from A3H: • Failure in the 90’: pedagogical strategiesx3; UM ≠ Student models, etc. motivation: instructional vs. investment, money; success measurement in education is difficult; good educational strategies are necessary; user treatment different: AH: cherished, AEH: challenged • Contra (A3EH similar to A3H): • engineering p.o.v., same technologies & techniques; same structure as argument; companies have tons of content, AH have technologies; both sides can learn from each other; the basic methods may be the same for commercial, e.g., and educational authoring of AH, but 'the devil is in the details'; ingredients + recipes • Other issues (authoring ++): • we don't really have complete success stories, • this being maybe one of the reasons why it's not accepted in commerce; • adding flexibility increases complexity; academia ≠ the best application for AH • AH for ‘page turning’ is useless; future of authoring, such as rich activity-based scenarios (simulations, game-like adaptation), • what to do to support AH-methods (or IF to do something, if it's not old news), if we want standards also based on adaptivity or not, etc.